Sketchbook Thread of Johan Derycke


#661

Hey Johan :slight_smile:

Been a while, so thought I’d pop in and see how you are going…
great to see the anatomy studies; so organic they become little treasures on their own - in an abstract sort of way :slight_smile:

Wondering what pencils you are using… (when you said you had to push really hard to make a mark on the recycled paper) just curious :slight_smile: There are these great leadstick like graphite pencils (you can sharpen them like normal ones, just the whole thing is the lead - so not a thin encased in wood stick…) They come in different hardness/softness grades, and I really like them (I use an 8B and a 4B, nice and “heavy” to hold) hmm but that was just my 2 cents worth, could be your paper likes that extra bit of attention :slight_smile:

Hope all is well and good your end
this end: looking forward to the end of winter :slight_smile:

cheers and take care
a. :slight_smile:


#662

Hi Johan, you have some great anatomy studies going on! Lovely shading on the bones and the arm muscles. It’s great to stop by and see what you are working on. I always need a bit of motivation when it comes to doing anatomy studies so thanks!:smiley:


#663

Bart, thanks.

Serena, I see what you mean. Thanks. I have charcoal in different sizes for when I work on large format paper (the anatomy studies are mostly on A4, except one on A3)

theflash, thanks. I use “Anatomy for the artist” by Jenö Barcsay. It’s my favourite book!

su, thanks. Glad you like 'em. Hope they are inspiring you to do some too :smiley:

Annette, hey there!
I’ve been using a mechanical pencil with 0.5mm 2B leads in it lately. It’s great for fast sketching and you don’t have to stop to sharpen.
On larger formats I like charcoal. I also have this Conte stick, which is basically the same as charcoal but it’s pressed and it contains glue (at least I think it does because my hands tend to get sticky when using it for too long, which is why I’m not all too fond of it)

All is great here :slight_smile:

Debbie, hey thanks! Such a nice compliment… I will have to do many many more of these though :wink:


No drawing today (I’m working on a larger drawing, will post when finished).
I’ve started reading Burne Hogarth’s Dynamic Figure Drawing again though. (I never got to finish it).

This time, I’ve made some notes. Maybe they are of use to anyone…
I’m posting these also for myself to have this summary at hand when I’m bored at work, and I will add more as I read more by editing this post :slight_smile:

 [b][size=3]Dynamic Figure Drawing by Burne Hogarth[/size][/b]

Chapter 1: Body Forms

[ul]
[li]Chest = dominating form[/li]
[li]Female vs male: hip<-> torso proportions[/li]
[li]Hip = butterfly[/li]
[li]Chest + hip = kidney[/li]
[li]Arms: always double upward curve[/li]Locate the elbow to locate the curves

[li]Legs: [/li]
Side-view rule:
ancklebone within lower leg contours = side-view = S-curve

Front-view rule:
Ancklebones protrude from leg contour = front-view = elongated B-shape

[/ul]
[ul]
[li]The hand is a tool[/li]
[list]
[li]4 fingers in line, rod & ball construction[/li]
[li]bottom of hand:[/li]
[list]
[li]thumb mound[/li]
[li]tapered lateral cushion[/li]
[li]horizontal row of palm pads[/li]
=>triangular depression in the middle

[/ul]
[li]thumb: not in line with fingers and palm plane[/li]
[/list]
[li]The foot is a support[/li]
[ul]
[li]heel[/li]
[li]sole[/li]
[li]arch --> instep[/li]
[li]toes: rod & ball construction (step arrangment is easier)[/li]2 horizontal steps, 1 vertical riser per toe
big toe is in line with small toes, the tip rises

[/ul]
[/list] Chapter 2: Figure Notation in Deep Space

Rule:

[ul]
[li]The Torso is primary (don’t start drawing a figure with the head).[/li]All other forms attach to this central double form (chest + hip wedge)

[li]Center Line[/li]
[li]When both torso masses are facing a different direction:[/li]

center line = S- line
[/ul] Rule:

[ul]
[li]The legs are secondary (function: support/balance).[/li]Pelvic wedge block initiates direction of the legs

[li]Belly bulge sqeezed in between the legs[/li]
[li]Feet thrust outward[/li]
[/ul] Rule:

[ul]
[li]Arms are 3rd in importance[/li]
[li]See both arms as 1 unit[/li]
[li]Collarbone is a true extension of the arm (=> yoked arms)[/li]
[li]In rear view, the armature is inverted. The arms then connect at the upper boundaries of the trapezius muscles[/li]
[li]In case of overlapping forms, seeing the origin of attached members & construction of obscured parts is important. (“transparancy”)[/li]
[/ul] Rule:

[ul]
[li]The head is last.[/li]
[/ul]


#664

Hey Johan!
Beautiful Anatomical studies there…I thinks they are really well rendered…You really are motivation for so many!!
And this idea of yours to take notes is superb :slight_smile: I’m going to be the first one to follow in your footsteps and do the same…

Take care…
Keep updating…
Ratul


#665

I like that book too, there are some really amazing stuff in it. But what frustrates me in that book is the dark lighting in all the drawings. Small drawings and dark lighting makes it really difficult to see particular details. I have some other books in the library which I refer a lot along with this book. I think you will find this helpful as well:
eSkeleton
you can download the whole thing and see the actual bones in different views. It has got animal skeletons as well.


#666

Hi…Johan …:slight_smile:

Great to see you are learning the princibles of creating figures in Burne Hogarths Dynamic Figure Drawing book…Really understanding those princables is sure to be well worth the effort spent …His book Dynamic Light and Shade is also a very helpful tool to have at your side…All of them are great really…I still find myself going back to them whenever I have a problem figure…The solutions to the problems I run into while creating figures, can always be found in his books…never fails…:slight_smile:
Anyway, I was just happy to see you post your notes from his teachings…:slight_smile:
As always, looking forward to seeing where the journy leads you to…:thumbsup:
TAKE CARE
Glenn


#667

Hi Johan,

I got two Hogarth books myself and the way he systematically breaks things down is rather unique.

Anyway, I was reading through your list yesterday and was thinking that this is quite a good summary, but Hogarth’s simplified anatomy examples should go along with it, because I did not really get the essence of most of the things which were mentioned or have a vague idea only.

Maybe, if you’re really going to follow through with your idea to keep this list updated and all, you want to add a few explanatory sketches as examples done by yourself?
Would make for an awesome tutorial one day…:smiley:


#668

I second this idea :thumbsup:


#669

:slight_smile: so do I (second tutorial :)) … and the note-taking is great! Such a good way to both absorb and condense valuable information.

and… mechanical pencil… bliss for when drawing out and about… 0.5 mm :eek: wow! very fine indeed! I have 2, one takes 5mm (I think…) lead and the other one takes 1mm. I really like the detail and flow of multiple lines all woven into a section (to shade or lift or otherway describe a part of the drawing) that you are achieving; I’d say patience hard work and a fine pencil all play their part in that one - not to mention your skills :wink: :slight_smile:

Hmm Conté… comes in a variety of types… some are more oily or “fat” and waxy than others - main thing is that it feels good to draw with.

found this little description…

"Conté crayon: Invented in 1795 by Nicolas-Jacques Conté in response to the short supply of graphite during the Napoleonic Wars, Conté crayons were a mixture of refined graphite and clay. The process of manufacture used less graphite and, by altering the proportion of lead to clay, allowed the degree of hardness of the crayon to be altered. Deficiencies in the quality of the natural chalks, particularly red chalk, appear to have been the impetus at the end of the eighteenth century for the production of Conté crayons from carbon black and iron oxide. Orange-red in color, and slightly less friable than natural chalk, these became known as sanguine Conté crayons. Since the late nineteenth century, many fabricated dry or waxy crayons have been referred to as “Conté crayon.”

cheers and take care
a. :slight_smile:


#670

Hey Johan,

Your notes for Hogarth’s are really useful. . .It never occurred to me to do so for books on drawing. I think I can follow your example and use these notes as a quick reference next time I draw.

I look forward to seeing more improvements, esp for drawing from imagination. . . which is something very hard for me, I must admit. :stuck_out_tongue:


My Sketchbook thread


#671

Hi Glenn! I’m always happy when you’re around my thread :slight_smile: thanks!

Mu, sirielle, Annette

Hm… I don’t mind posting notes but I don’t think anyone could illustrate what the man is talking about in his books any better than Mr Hogarth himself… so I don’t think I should re-write/illustrate his book :wink:

I do hope you will recognize some of the things from my notes when I share some figure drawings though!

Here’s a commission I finished today. I took 28 pictures of it and none of them was good, couldn’t get a satisfying result by tweaking it digitally either so this image really does not represent the actual drawing, which is originally 32.6cm x 42.8cm

The real drawing has more contrast, more detail, more white
Sorry for the terrible quality. I will try to take a picture tomorrow morning and change it if I get a better one.


#672

Hi…Johan …:slight_smile:

WOW …I really like that drawing of the two kids…Beautiful rendering job, and you even managed to get all those curles in the one kids hair to look loose, soft, and full of air…Great line work there…reminds me of DaVinci’s drawings of flowing water,and atmosphere motion studies in his later works…FANTASTIC JOB:applause: …KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK, and PROGRESS…Johan.:thumbsup:
TAKE CARE
Glenn


#673

Hey Johan! thats a beeeautiful picture!!:thumbsup: Your rendering is awesome!.. lot of work in there, I can see… can you post a bigger picture?


#674

Hey Glenn, Anand,

wow… thanks!

Here’s a bigger, better picture

In the future, with these kind of commissions, I will try to implement a more interesting light setup. I’m not too fond of this frontal light setup one can usually see (people use flashlight all the time to take pictures)

Thanks for the tap on the shoulder guys, really means a lot from experienced artists like you!

edit: just noticed I have forgotten to draw her ear decoration (a little butterfly)
woops blushes
Thank god I haven’t delivered yet :smiley:


#675

Hi Johan, nice portrait! It is an extra difficulty if a flashlight is used to take the picture. Anyway it is a great rendering!


#676

Wow, those kids looks so realistic, nice job. I’m reading Dynamic Figure Drawing too… interspersed with all the Loomis books and some Jack Hamm thrown in there too. Unfortunately my attention span is too low to stick with one book til the end, but its fun getting different takes on the same thing!


#677

B-E-A-U-T-F-U-L
Amazing work Johan!!
You guys are Real inspiration for me…:slight_smile:

Keep rocking…


#678

WOW their eyes:)their smile!..beautifully sketched:bounce:


#679

Hey Johan, Awesome sketch of the kids, just beautiful! :thumbsup:


#680

Hey Johan,

The kids’ cuteness and innocence really comes through in your rendering! Great job! :thumbsup: :slight_smile: :wink:

Just a question: Are you allowed to modify the drawing slightly different from the photo? For example increasing the contrast? As in the values are relationally similar but more extreme. Or you have to render the photo ‘as it is’? Increasing the contrast will be the icing on the cake, I think. :slight_smile:

Take care, have fun.