Howdy guys,
I’ve received a few emails over the last 12 hours from people requesting personal feedback from the judges, in most cases they only provided feedback for either the first place winner or in a few cases the first and second places. However, through my own ‘numpsy’ lack of attention one judges did provide feeback for a third entry and even though there was no third place i feel it’s only fare to post their critique. So unofficially you could say that third place goes to:
Sorin Bechira
pros:
nicely framed composition, viewer “stays” in the picture,
original idea to place a grave yard in the middle, destroyed building in the background works well.
interesting ambience and subtle choice of colors.
contras:
overall, very blurry feel. The foreground elements could have been worked out better, with different levels of detail and depth following the perspective.
Compositionwise a lot of space is “wasted” in the dark on the left and right side. Additionally it feels very symetrically framed.
The lighting of the midground structure, doesn’t match the lighting of the background structure on the left.
Lots of elements feel very “painted”, due to the blurryness and uniform distribution of details, while lacking some subtle color and value variation.
overall:
Nice piece to look at - the “dead” feeling goes very well with the topic of an aged building.
[font=Arial]Daniel Kvasznicza
www.inetgrafx.com
[/font]
Apologies to Sorin. And to everyone else, that’s everything folks 