Buckie is right. Lets not sugarcoat things.
Open GL performance sucks on the macbook core duo’s. Even the ibooks were faster.
Painting is out from what I hear.
Screen thats so small. Yes, if you want to get by with a bare necesity miserable 3D experiance then go with the 13 inch. But lets be honest… I’m using a 17 inch imac at work and its miserably small for Modo and 3D. Modo takes up alot of screen space…
And buy the way with the Macbook it will take an external monitor to 24" and a resolution of 1900 X 1200
Maybe thats of interest to you but the original poster did not mention wanting to hookup external, seemed like he wanted portablilty since he mentioned the weight of it.
Difference between macbook and mac pro on weight:
macbook 13 inch - 5.2 pounds
macbook pro 15 inch - 5.6
macbook pro 17 inch - 6.8
So your dealing within a pound and a half here for the 17 inch and .4 of a pound with the 15 inch. I highly doubt you will see a difference.
macbook pro = pro laptop, fitting for 3D.
mabcook = cool apple laptop for you ilife suite… can get by with alot of 3D features but will be a lousy experiance.
Bottom line:
I dislike the respones that just jump in with the asumptions.
Buckie and gelfie are dead on. I have a black macbook and absolutly love it. Its a great computer! BUT, macbooks were not meant for 3D and pro apps… you need something with a true video card for that. Period!
Asumptions? More like experiance…
Ps. I doubt you will find a pc laptop that is of equal quality and specs, run OS X and Windows and is the same price range as the macbook pros. They are truly awesome machines. If you don’t need portablity then I do recommend the imacs as they are even better (in an aspect or two) and cheaper. Even if you don’t think you need it… get the biggest screen you can afford on a laptop (or anything). The wieght isn’t that much of a difference…
Hope this helps : )