I don’t think that PWS filters are flexable enough to do what you are looking for here. specifically there is no way to have it single out Nulls or Bones that are part of models. it can only filter Objects or use text tags.
Well it should be. I think that bones and nulls should be added to the filter PWS list.
In my opinion the best way to go about this is to use the text filters But since you have already indicated that you would rather not do that…
In the future I’ll be aware to name my structure more appropriatly… but since it’s all the DOTD data from 8.5… it’s not!
I don’t want to be destructive to any of the work already done. For now i’m looking for a solution to view only what I want to define as a “set” of items… to be the ONLY thing showing.
I’d like to suggest a filter that will grab everything you have selected (or marked) and throw those items in thier own tab. (like a group)
Objects would probably should not be exclusive to the Tab, so that you can have the same item in multiple tabs.
try creating a set of poses to show/hide the controls you want and place them on thier own tab of the Pose Slider window via a Folder. Once you have the poses set to unhide and hide bones hide all the bones in the model. Then you can just turn on the FK arm controls, for example and see only those bones in the workspace, this does not change the PWS listing, but it comes closest to filtering what you want from what you don’t.
Hmm. Now doesnt this only work for the bone icons in the viewport? This doesn’t work with objects visable in the PWS?
My workflow would be aided if I could figure out a way to select a multitude of objects… (could be anything). Then place these objects into a Tab in the PWS that will now only display these objects… and in the corresponding timeline.
Then if I wanted to see the bigger picture I could select the “All” tab… and view everything.
This would enable you to make a multitude of “layers” of view for the PWS. One per character, one per compicated model/set…etc.
Just a way to get at the data more effeciently I would think.
jdates