thanks Giom! to me, yes, it is about both. although in terms of technique and skill it isn’t always about how realistic it is, but still about the aesthetic. i’m not sure if i mentioned it before but i consider Rodin my favorite sculptor. much of his work is mostly about the emotion but still claims a certain aesthetic that i like(but not always). he could do realism(The Age of Bronze was actually accused of being a life cast) but chose a little more expressive route. I would say Michelangelo was a more technically skilled sculptor, but the Emotion in Rodin works trump it for me. although when Michelangelo was older it seems he did alot more imperfect/ unfinished emotive pieces i really like.
i’m afraid i can’t really say what people really think of it at the show. unless i stood next to it and listened. when i visited i really only saw one couple really like it and a younger kid say a title would really help it (which it would), but this was also when there was no description up. i ended up choosing to put “How do you console someone without the use of your hands? what if words aren’t enough?” which i hope gets the idea across, but maybe not. i don’t know how many votes its got, but it’s more away and hidden than the bulk of the work there.
Thanks Glenn! i’m trying to take care of the eye, but it has a history of trying to injure itself. sounds like this surgery will give me cataracts in a few years. fun.
you can see the other works at artprize.org , but be aware alot of it is modern, abstract and crafty. i’ve joked around that it should be changed from ArtPrize to CraftPrize or MarketingPrize since artists hired people to go around handing out leaflets and promoting their work.
actually here’s one of my favorite Rodin sculptures that was part of my initial inspiration for my sculpture. his is obviously much better than mine.
