This is a useful and informative thread which you’ve linked, however I disagree with your suggestion that I should not be drawing from life.
I find life drawing to be a valuable practice, especially for scrutinizing real surfaces and their colour detail first hand, which was predominantly the purpose of the image in this post, to experiment with texture and colour.
While there are many many faults with this image, I wouldn’t say it’s all that bad for a quick practice sketch.
The thumb does appear stubby, and this is partially artist’s error, but also partly due to the fact that I do have stubby little thumbs and fingers. Same goes for the odd shapes of the nails, that’s the way they are, and that’s the way I’ve painted them.
While making it, I was mostly concerned with the process of attempting to loosely but nicely capture the little details and texture, with some more energetic colouring, to follow up on advice given to me in my other post; was hoping someone might offer criticism in these areas. Certainly not looking for ego-boosts, but it’s not the most encouraging thing in the world to be greeted by only a bad point. If a person is to progress they also need to know which good elements, if any, they should carry forward to the next painting.
Lastly, I would not say I’m a beginner to painting; I am new to digital painting, but have good experience drawing and painting in a variety of media on paper and canvas. It may not be readily apparent from my two posts that I have ‘mastered simple copies of 2D images,’ but I can say that I have worked hard to become proficient at drawing accurately from both 2D and 3D forms. Even if this was not the case, and I was new to drawing, I still wouldn’t completely rule out drawing from life; much as it may be a daunting task to approach when you’re starting out, it can also pay off greatly in the long run, giving you a greater grasp of depth and form than you would have if you purely practised re-translating a 2D image, as I’m sure you would agree.