Kurt wrote:
>But as I understand it, the goal is to expand the user base and attract new users. This will >strengthen the company and improve the software for EVERYONE.
Then let me allow one question. How do you attract users (new) to 3D? I think when users looking around for commercial 3D Software first thing they do is comparing/studying the galleries, then the feature list and finally the price,. The intitial question of this thread was rendering speed and nice results. Camera should be also up to date like it´s competitors. If this is not possible in the near future then EITG should consider adding a hook to EIAS, allowing 3rd party renderers. This would add also more value to EIAS, i think. If this is not wanted, of course, then like Ian said add stuff like Photon Mapping, if it helps, or things which makes GI better/faster, like final gathering, irradiance caching etc.
Juan wrote:
>What we want ? A medium app with a lot medium tools ?
I think we have something like a top notch inbetween medium/high end app, which was once a high end app only. If EIAS would belong to the “Big 5” (here in CGTalk for example) then we would not discuss here so many times, what we need (because we see it from the others here) and what not, and concentrate only on sharing cool EIAS Tips and showing the latest stuff or participating, as proud EIAS users, in CGTalk competitions.
Well, that´s my 2 euro cents, (happy rendering!)
Stefan