what the heck is going on with HASH

#395

Hiya.

All this talk kinda got me thinking. I was saying to myself “What a pice of sh*% software!”. Then it hit me. The only real reason why the software ‘sucks’, is because of who’s making it. It’s like seeing a bright, quick witted, personable child…who has an abusive father and crack whore mother. You think, “Aww. That kid has such potential!”. But you know the old saying…“You can’t choose your parents”.

I’m thinking of AM that way. It has such potential. I started using AM with AM98 (started with trueSpace2; AM was my second app). If AM had been in the hands of a company like Pixologic, or even Avid or Newtek…I’m betting AM would be a serious contender for the ‘mid price’ range (it would probably be about $750) right now. It would likely be quite stable, and “play well with others”. But, AM is owned by Hash. And Hash is like the abusive father; holding AM back. Sad, really.

#396

Originally posted by Paul L. Ming
If AM had been in the hands of a company like Pixologic,

Yeah, if Pixologic were making AM the updates would always come out 7 times later then what they say and the interface would be so bass-ackwards when you clicked on a bone it would bring up the material editor. On second thought, maybe Pixologic wouldn’t be sucha good choice… :drool:

#397

Originally posted by My Fault
Yeah, if Pixologic were making AM the updates would always come out 7 times later then what they say and the interface would be so bass-ackwards when you clicked on a bone it would bring up the material editor. On second thought, maybe Pixologic wouldn’t be sucha good choice… :drool:

My Fault,

I dont know what your talking about Pixologic has always done a great job with thier software. If your talking about the 1.55 release its not really an update to 1.5 but more of a new version with lots of extra features, in my mind updates are put out to fix bugs not add features. Sure it took longer then they said it would be you still have a rock solid app, I have not got a crash with ZB since I have owned it back at version 1.23.

Pixologic listens to the users and you can post what ever you want on the forum they are a great bunch of folks. Just because you wait an extra 6 months for 1.55 makes them a bad company? If that what you belive then I dont think you will be happy with any company. They could have said nothing about 1.55 or shown no previews of what they are working on and just put it out 6 months later and you would have thought it was great.

Come on man Pixologic is one of the best companies out there hands down.

#398

I would consider Pixologic more of a wash, not bad, not good. Putting out a demo with features that real users didn’t have…not good. Always taking longer then they say to release updates (many, many times in the past)… not good. Worst interface in an app since the beginning of history… not good (personal opinion of course).

But hey, if they make you happy, that’s great for you, just don’t think that everyone thinks that everyone agrees with you on that, cuz they don’t. Kind of like Hash, some people love them, some people hate them. Don’t take it personal. :thumbsup:

#399

I think LW has the rep of the worst interface ever. ZB’s inteface makes perfict sence once you understand how it works. There is a learning curve coming from a standard modeling app I do agree with that.

The demo thing I do agree with too but it was only a week or so from the demo release till the full update came out so not bad.

Plus they treat the users right and that goes a long way and the app is solid so i’ll give them a break on the release.

I’m not taking it personal just trying to understand where your coming from.

#400

Originally posted by dfaris
[B]I think LW has the rep of the worst interface ever. ZB’s inteface makes perfict sence once you understand how it works.

While I agree that some learning is essential with any piece of software, the hallmark of a well-designed interface is one that is, to the maximum extent possible, self-evident. For me, it’s not so much whether it ‘makes sense’ after I learn it, it’s what kinds of mental gymnastics I have to endure in order to understand the reasoning behind it.

#401

If any of you are web designers you probably know that what you should do is what everybody else does. Yeah … I know it sounds boring and it is. Heck you have all those ideas and the tools and you actually have to accept that people visiting you site not are the least interested in figuring out how your cool interface works and spending any time on learning how to navigate it.

It’s a bit of the same with applications. You do however have more than 30 seconds, your boss might say take it or leave or it’s the only one you can afford.

I wanted to buy a ‘world’ renderer a while ago and evaluated Bryce and Vue. Bryce did not even stand a chance. I sat down with the apps and tried to do something with them.

By the time I was trowing out great renders with Vue, importing models, applying materials, creating procedurals without even reading the manual i still was at the ‘render a sphere level’ in Bryce having to look in the manual even for simple interface stuff.

The only thing that could have saved Bryce after that was if it would have managed to do something that Vue could not. But as it could not I bought Vue. I also save almost 50% of my money on that.

I also bought ZBrush(1.23) but I hated the ‘none standard interface’, the totally unreadable typface, bad windows integration and the license system so I returned the product and got a refound.

When I buy a computer product I don’t want to have to fight and waist time on learning the interface unless it’s absolutely nessesary.

Well just my $0.02435 incase anyone cares… :wink:

#402

If you think Hash is unique in trying to supress free speech – take a look at the LightWave forum here on cgtalk, where they are actually censoring threads. If I’m not mistaken, the moderator actually works at NewTek. Hell, these guys make Steve look like Thomas Jefferson.

Thank God for this forum and the super cool moderator we have.

#403

I have sensored a few things. Mainly just attacks people launch on each other. Makes me feel like crap though. I mean. . . we all sit around bashing on one thing. . . and that means we can’t bash on each other?

Kinda hard to know what to do. . .

#404

without dragging this thread off topic…

Did I miss something in the LW forum, pabitel?

Leigh deleted two threads that started as speculation about LW8 - a topic that has been beat to death over there, and one which pisses a lot of people off - and you say she’s worse then Steve?! I would hardly call that censorship or even an attempt to suppress free speech.

And for the record, as far as I know she does not work for Newtek.

Wegg - feel free to delete this post (if it’s possible?) - my intention is not to drag this into the mud. I just find it a bit of an unjust exageration unless I missed something over there recently.

#405

as one of the censored :slight_smile: i’d say that it’s being done only when absolutely necessary… when the thread becomes both disruptive and irrelevant to the topic at hand: the good and bad aspects of life with animation: master.

i’ve got no complants. it’s light-years from the one-sided treatment on the animaster list.

-jon

#406

Originally posted by pabitel
If you think Hash is unique in trying to supress free speech – take a look at the LightWave forum here on cgtalk, where they are actually censoring threads. If I’m not mistaken, the moderator actually works at NewTek. Hell, these guys make Steve look like Thomas Jefferson.

Yes, one of the moderators does work for NewTek.

However, I think your accusation is completely unfounded. We are all SICK TO DEATH of that topic that I (not William) removed. I wouldn’t have even removed it, since I started ignoring those threads a long time ago, but I received a few complaints about it from users (not NewTek employees), so I removed it.

Thank God for this forum and the super cool moderator we have.

Well, the moderator here certainly has better manners than you.

I am highly insulted by your RUDE, IGNORANT, and STUPID comment about my actions being inspired by Apartheid regime of my countrys past. You obviously know nothing about the atrocities of that era.
I think that was a disgusting comment to make.

We have a system on this forum of removing threads that we receive complaints about, and if you don’t like that, then don’t come here.

It’s not like we are just removing any ones that we don’t like or don’t agree with (like the old Hash list), we are removing the ones that become troublesome.

You obviously have no idea about how a forum is run, or about South African history, for that matter, since you seem to be able to mention that shameful era with such casualness.

I really think you need to learn some manners and courtesy.

#407

often threads are removed by the request of the thread starter as well as others. leigh is a very cool mod, ask anybody there, and she does not work for newtek.

#408

Originally posted by pabitel
[B]If you think Hash is unique in trying to supress free speech – take a look at the LightWave forum here on cgtalk, where they are actually censoring threads. If I’m not mistaken, the moderator actually works at NewTek. Hell, these guys make Steve look like Thomas Jefferson.

Thank God for this forum and the super cool moderator we have. [/B]

Wow, I can’t believe you actually made an “Apartheid” crack to Leigh on the LW forum. You need to apologize right now or get the heck outta here. Absolutely pathetic!

:thumbsdow :thumbsdow :thumbsdow

#409

Hey guy,
Looks like you raised a stink. The thread has been put back on the forum so you can look at it.
Of course, we all know we’ll never see the name you used for that attack again, as you will undoubtedly re-registered under a less embarrassing handle.
But YOU ought to be quite embarrassed and shamed.
Robert Wilson
UnCommon Grafx

#410

Originally posted by My Fault
[B]Wow, I can’t believe you actually made an “Apartheid” crack to Leigh on the LW forum. You need to apologize right now or get the heck outta here. Absolutely pathetic!

:thumbsdow :thumbsdow :thumbsdow [/B]

I better get the heck outta here. Right now.

#411

Originally posted by pabitel
I better get the heck outta here. Right now.

Not a surprise, you don’t strike me as being man enough to apologize.

#412

Pabitel wrote: I better get the heck outta here. Right now.

We do not argue with you this time…

While it is easy to see red, let us instead cool down with some good
music or whatever.

Let’s give the man the benefit of doubt; that he really didn’t think too much about what he wrote…

Stay cool. Stay friendly.

Cheers,
Rune

#413

Did you guys see what was posted on the other thread about netrender? Someguy got an email from Steve who said something about pointsampler?

{{However, there are times when Multipass is beneficial, even necessary (DOF, Motion Blur, multi-light rigs) for those reasons, there will be a new “pointsampler” renderer in 10.5 that will include Multipass- it’s important to note, that this will be a TRUE multipass renderer, not a hybird like at has been in the past}}

Cool.

#414

Originally posted by koon69
[B]Did you guys see what was posted on the other thread about netrender? Someguy got an email from Steve who said something about pointsampler?

{{However, there are times when Multipass is beneficial, even necessary (DOF, Motion Blur, multi-light rigs) for those reasons, there will be a new “pointsampler” renderer in 10.5 that will include Multipass- it’s important to note, that this will be a TRUE multipass renderer, not a hybird like at has been in the past}}

Cool. [/B]

Maybe…but I’m going to give my spine a little exercise as I take advantage of my right as a consumer to conduct any future business with a company that values its customers.