Hi Nucleo,
A. In dealing with shifting time periods, the important thing
is to modify the events without changing the story’s message
and characters. Things doesn’t always have to match-up exactly
to the original story (sometimes that’s not possible) so the key is
to look at the story from a Different Perspective!!
Take the situations and conflicts that the character faces and
think about how that same conflict can be found in modern times.
As an example, let’s say it’s a story about a servant boy
mistreated in medieval times, a parallel to that can be a modern
office worker filing away in a cubical 24/7 to keep his job.
Even if nothing else stays the same, keep the story’s basic structure
flow, the characters’ personalities/relationships and the story’s
theme/message constant and you will be left with, at the very least,
a solid replica that is sincere to the intent of the original.
B. In turning a book to a screenplay, what kind of problem are you
having? Is it too long? Is it that you can’t convert events in a book
onscreen like internal monologues?
I’m not sure if there’s a formal way to convert from one medium to
another, but what I like to do is scene-mapping.
It’s basically like laying out a summary of the story and taking all the
scenes that must absolutely be there for the story to work.
As a pointer:
DO NOT select scenes just because it makes up the events of the story.
You’ll wind-up with too many to handle and they can easily turn to fluff.
Instead, select scenes because it makes up the style of the story.
Every book has scenes that give the book its certain flair.
Take those scenes and convert them into the screenplay,
then build the story plot around it. It’ll make the process
a lot simpler and more enjoyable.
As an example, let’s say there’s a great deal of tension between
two friends in the book that lasted for a long period of time and
it’s something that can’t be replayed onscreen. So, in the
screenplay, wrap that tension and relationship into a dialogue,
it’ll move the plot along faster and add movement to the story.
Books are more closely related to emotions whereas films can also
appeal to the senses. So if you can’t reach that deeply into the
emotional element, then makeup what you can express with pictures
but not with words.
My opinion is that it’s better to come up with an entirely new scene
that COMPLEMENTS the book rather than follow the text exactly but
still mess-up in conveying to the viewers what the story is REALLY about.
ThinkStory
