First to the picture: I don´t think the lash fits the rest of the image (hint for walrus!). I would expect a more uptodate catching mechanism. Maybe a laser kind of thing, or holographic, something more on par with the rest of the technology. However, I think the police man must have kind of spider super powers to react that fast when that guy crashes out of the wall.
Maybe going a different route would be better for the composition. Or you somehow indicate that the police guy knew he would crash out of there (like showing other guys scanning other walls nearby with an xray gun or similar, or him having a 3d holo projection coming out of his car showing the situation inside the wall)
btw. I like the added details of the background!
@walrus: Of course it´s your opinion and yes I don´t agree. But please leave it up to me on which parts of your comments I answer seperately. That´s what quote brackets are used for you know?! Giving different opinions on different parts of other opinions (of course you can suggest to CGTalk to restrict postings to one quote bracket but well, the chances are good they won´t take that suggestion ;) hey, this was sarcasm, don´t punish me!).
Not sure why you felt attacked by it, but it was not my intention. To me it´s simply clearer to comment different parts of a posting seperately (if I quote).
Anyway, dynamic composition is totally off from motion, in the end it´s a composition. This will work either in a still image or in a motion picture, the rules are exactly the same. For motion pictures you just have to take other aspects into account that might appear in following pictures, but that barely changes a good dynamic composition. You may take a different composition therefore in a motion picture but that doesn´t touch the dynamics of a composition or make one composition less dynamic than the other.
Roughly put, a dynamic composition of a still image will work in a motion picture in the same way and show the same dynamics, as a motion picture is nothing else than a series of still images shifted in time.





