Of course, such fundamental things are only for next versions.
as i said. v2 or even later. but let’s just talk about ideas.
when v2 is on it’s way into beta, who knows if i am on the team to bring this to your attention.
if i continue likes this, maybe you don’t even want me back on the team 
but here it goes:
First we see no way to align imported group perfectly (EI group or FACT as well) - any conversion from 3D to 2D can miss data.
as it is now, sure. i can see why.
but these wires have information on them where they are in world space. i imaging this could somehow be translated into graph values (with automated graph size change to incorporate values like x: -1500 y: 2567).
for z values there are 3 possible scenarios:
- ignore them (project to 0 -> 2d)
- require the user to only use 2d wires (reject other wires)
- use the z values. in graph editor only x,y values can be edited, but z values can be edited in XP or spread sheet mode.
again i am no programmer and do know nothing about math
But ok, imagine a “boom” is here
and we see, say, a 10 poly-lines inside graph editor. Obviously we need much more controls, as minimum to select/activate/move a whole poly-line.
select polyline = double click on point or edge to select the whole polyline
move = same as now, move what’s selected
activate/deactivate = maybe a little window like master/slave editor or rename childs with a list of all wires. with checkboxes to activate or deactivate.
how about a rotate tool for selections with more than one point?
But what constructive a user can do with our multiply wires - that’s absolute not clear. “Multi-scrimming”? Hmm… we never trusted that’s a super-powerful way.
hmm, the reason is the same as “why trestle at all?”!
everything that trestle and scrim does can be made outside of EIAS, sometimes even better and more flexible. but the mainreason trestle and scrim are so great is that they are fast, have great workflow and are animatable to the core.
if you have to wrestle with 10 or 20 wires that form a logo or something, then the current approach is not fast and has no great workflow.
AND that would lead a “possible” way of eps into EIAS. EIM imports them, formZ too i think. Export as wires, open with trestle. voila. personally i don’t have much use for this, but many people do.
Maybe (and sometimes) it can give interesting results (we seen no one example though
). What are “some other operations” you write? IMO it’s always better (and much easier) to start a plan with concrete things that are apparently interested and usable.
other operations refer to brians comment that trestle should be the 2d hub for other things that are (might be) comming.
as always these suggestions are coming from hands-on project work. give me a little time and i try to put a stripped down project online. but i hope you understand what i mean. english isn’t my mother-language, so i try to describe the things as good as i can.