Post random photos amongst a free-for-all bonanza of stylish commentary about life.


#16861

Even tho I’m home (and sometimes netless) for X-mas, this has been one of the strangest X-mases yet. Seeing Squibbit’s illu and Rens’ pics does make my heart feel warmer and lift me out of this bittersweet feeling I’m in.


#16862

Strange, how so?

Share!


#16863

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO MY CG Bonanza Family!

Love you guys!

:love:


#16864

Merry Christmas all you nutty people!


#16865

yay thanks , Ines!

Some more christmas art, from top of my shelf, a candle holder
my mom gave me for christmas and a candle made by some
homeless people I bought to support them

hehe


#16866

This one is specially for our own google bot, Rebecca :smiley:

Hope you all have a wonderful Christmas!


#16867

lets prance

feels silly today, to much sugar… DAMN THE HOLIDAYS!


#16868

Are those gnomon dvds :)?


#16869

i think he´s trying to show off… while not knowing about it. :slight_smile:


#16870

Man, this is damn funny… :smiley:

the Artist said this about his work:

Q. To begin with, could you describe this work?

A. Yes, of course. What I’ve done is change a glass of water into a full-grown oak tree without altering the accidents of the glass of water.

Q. The accidents?

A. Yes. The colour, feel, weight, size …

Q. Do you mean that the glass of water is a symbol of an oak tree?

A. No. It’s not a symbol. I’ve changed the physical substance of the glass of water into that of an oak tree.

Q. It looks like a glass of water.

A. Of course it does. I didn’t change its appearance. But it’s not a glass of water, it’s an oak tree.

Q. Can you prove what you’ve claimed to have done?

A. Well, yes and no. I claim to have maintained the physical form of the glass of water and, as you can see, I have. However, as one normally looks for evidence of physical change in terms of altered form, no such proof exists.

Q. Haven’t you simply called this glass of water an oak tree?

A. Absolutely not. It is not a glass of water anymore. I have changed its actual substance. It would no longer be accurate to call it a glass of water. One could call it anything one wished but that would not alter the fact that it is an oak tree.

Q. Isn’t this just a case of the emperor’s new clothes?

A. No. With the emperor’s new clothes people claimed to see something that wasn’t there because they felt they should. I would be very surprised if anyone told me they saw an oak tree.

Q. Was it difficult to effect the change?

A. No effort at all. But it took me years of work before I realised I could do it.

Q. When precisely did the glass of water become an oak tree?

A. When I put the water in the glass.

Q. Does this happen every time you fill a glass with water?

A. No, of course not. Only when I intend to change it into an oak tree.

Q. Then intention causes the change?

A. I would say it precipitates the change.

Q. You don’t know how you do it?

A. It contradicts what I feel I know about cause and effect.

Q. It seems to me that you are claiming to have worked a miracle. Isn’t that the case?

A. I’m flattered that you think so.

Q. But aren’t you the only person who can do something like this?

A. How could I know?

Q. Could you teach others to do it?

A. No, it’s not something one can teach.

Q. Do you consider that changing the glass of water into an oak tree constitutes an art work?

A. Yes.

Q. What precisely is the art work? The glass of water?

A. There is no glass of water anymore.

Q. The process of change?

A. There is no process involved in the change.

Q. The oak tree?

A. Yes. The oak tree.

Q. But the oak tree only exists in the mind.

A. No. The actual oak tree is physically present but in the form of the glass of water. As the glass of water was a particular glass of water, the oak tree is also a particular oak tree. To conceive the category ‘oak tree’ or to picture a particular oak tree is not to understand and experience what appears to be a glass of water as an oak tree. Just as it is imperceivable it also inconceivable.

Q. Did the particular oak tree exist somewhere else before it took the form of a glass of water?

A. No. This particular oak tree did not exist previously. I should also point out that it does not and will not ever have any other form than that of a glass of water.

Q. How long will it continue to be an oak tree?

A. Until I change it.


#16871

haha

yea first I was just thinking taking a pic of the candle, then I thought it would be funny
to have the Manowar banner in there too

the gnomon dvd’s are the community award from cgtalk’s grand space opera challenge

ps. forgot, cool pics, Rens :thumbsup:

.


#16872

Originally posted by Marlon:

This one is specially for our own google bot, Rebecca :smiley:

Hope you all have a wonderful Christmas!

Hahaha, thanks Marlon! :smiley: Merry Christmas, Everyone! :slight_smile:


#16873


lol
notice the expression and the hand pose


#16874

art2, that “artist” is retarded!!

And of course MERRY CHRISTMAS everyone!!


#16875

Merry Cristmas, Family, I hope all of u guys enjoyed it!:thumbsup:


#16876

Did this go wOOOSh over my head? Do we have our first bonanza couple? do we? do we? :stuck_out_tongue:


#16877

U mean after the Rebecca/Google union ?

:bounce:

.


#16878

She’s cheating on Roberto with Google?

:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:


#16879


#16880

Hehe, nice one. :smiley: We should have that picture as our logo. :slight_smile: