Hi I noticed that there was a comment on a thread regarding over sharpening,
the only time you really need to sharpen is for print purposes, the image on screen will look oversharpened however will print perfectly. On a forty foot screen the halo, and aberration will be obvious.
If you go to the cinema you will notice that the CGI films are oversharp, however film stock if you look carefully is soft (including IMAX). Which is why some artists slip grain into the image. Which unnerves me as matching film stock is an art best left to a compositor.
There are a variety of ways to sharpen an image, but its the responsibility of the compositor or offline/online editor to do so.
I have noticed an alarming trend to emulate CGI crispness, this may have come from the HD world where crispness is meant to mean quality. Something that we are being brainwashed into by the blue ray lobby.
So I am now going to leave sharpening alone unless it is for print. I am going to suggest that if someone posts an image that they declare sharpened for print.
I will post here my two techniques for sharpening for print.
Sharpening technique 1
It is bad form to sharpen a colour image, reason why is that halos are formed, over highlights, it overpowers specular and adds ghosting.
Convert image into LAB colour it will complain that you need to flatten your image, just conitnue with out flattening the image.
Channels select lightness and the image will pop up greyscale, now go into filters and select Unsharp Mask or Smart Sharpen.
Select preview
Now you have a percentage slider, in six years of working professionally I have never gone beyond 80%
Now you can select pixel radius if you move the slider up and sown you can see the image gets pretty sharp.
The best place to start is look for the following areas,
Specular Highlights
Fur
Grass
Leaves
White over Black/ black over white
Text
Texture
Brickwork
Cloud fringes
Move the slider up and down and look at these areas, you need adjust it to taste. Dont panic as the black and white halos will not show up in your image.
(If you are unsure where your deep blacks and highlights are you can do a test in threshhold filter)
If you are in smart sharpen I tend to do this in gaussian mode as this will effect the whole image.
select ok and then select lab channel and you will see an obvious difference. At this point zoom in and identify the problem areas.
Remember to select mode and go back to RGB. You do not have to flatten it.
I know several people that try and work in LAB mode as much as possible (Google Dan Margulis he is the adobe expert who can explain better than I).
Second method
I used a compressed layer all the time in my work, though not advised if you are like Dusso and like to do a lot of fine adjustments on the fly.
Compressed Layer
Make sure you have a new layer at the top of the layer stack
Press Ctrl+Alt+Shift+E
This will flatten your layers into a new compressed layer
Ctrl+J
This duplicates your top layer
Go into Filters and select High Pass filter, adjust the pixel radius as far to the left before losing the image you will see that the image gets sharper.
Go to layer blend mode and select either hard light or soft light (personal taste here) you will see the image is sharpened. There are two further adjustments you can do here either using the opacity slider or as I do create a layer mask and paint in areas you want sharp.
Big, Big suggestion here remember depth of field, items in the focal range should be sharp whilst items in the distance are softer.
Unless you are emulating hyper focal distance, which is a advanced landscape photography technique.
If you remember foreground, mid ground and background and change the sharpness to get softer the further the distance away. The image will now look more realistic without looking too CGI.
I am sure there strong views on putting in film grain and sharpening for some artists, however if you did this and presented it to a compositor you might get a stern look.
Look forward to your comments, be nice, and if you have a better technique please share
Rich