harnelbe: Thank you for your kind comments. Sometimes I choose to only sketch out the most important elements in a design and worry about them when I get there usually as I progress with rendering the illustration. This way I add details at that perticulair moment. It ususally feels right when I do it. Yes you are right about the gun. Its perspective is messed up as we should be looking a bit from the bottom. I already made notes to corect that when I do the good version. Iāll probably do a mock-up of the gun in 3d and set it up for refrence to corectly fix the perspective problem. I hope I answered your your question and adressed your comment. 
Empy: Thank you friend. Thats the reason I draw. The stuf I create makes me feel like a kid too. 
Quizboy: I know youād like to see more than one rider on this creature, and because it would give valid reason why all theese muscles. But my intent was to have it carry a single person. Its not that the creature canāt handle two or more people, because it can its just that the size I imagined would only allow one saddle or enough equipment for one person comfortably. (please read on Iāll explain the validity of all the muscles below). Sorry maybe another time Quizboy

js rolhion, Ravendsg, riki, Russel_Nash, tungaunga, Nov@: thank you guys for your kind comments, its super nice to hear! I want to get drunk with al you you ! (shit! it wonāt allow me tu put anither smiley) CHEERS!
cgg: Thank man. If youāre serious enough e-mail me and weāll talk.
markw7: Was the equipment in lets say starwars any cost effective??? Iām not sure. The only way I can answer your question is that this creaturer can live upto 700 years, all it needs is some chemicals and hormones to live, and has a much much higher capebility than a humvee to sniff out any intruders, it could also climb terrain with the help of its hooks with in its hooves that a humvee couldnāt tackle (unless it was the humvee from the simpsons that Mcvain drove
) ā¦good points though!