If cost is not a huge issue, you might be interested in Maya. I used it on some SGI machines a while back and it rarely crashed. I think Maya though isn’t really geared for the single user like A:M is. You could go with messiah:animate and use it with the Cinema 4d base package or use it with Lightwave. I think it also works with Maya. I think there’s pros that use messiah and use it with whatever software there company has.
www.zoogono.com is a site with some helpful tools for messiah.
Thanks for the feedback. I have tried Blender and it looks interesting, and I love the idea of being able to copy/flip/paste bones. I kinda wonder if I should be looking at mainstream apps, just incase I get good enough, one day, to get in with a studio, or at least be compatable with a large part of the CG animation world.
Wegg, I would love to solve my A:M problems, but I have to admit I have ny doubts. On this latest project, which was planned to be a 1 minute music video, I first got into trouble when trying to blend actions. I narrowed the problem down to adujsting the percent for add or blend. I’m still not clear on the difference. I got through that by making the blended pose start in a very similar postition as the one being blended with. All went fairly well, except for the camera constraints getting messed up, often, models that diassapear in real time, but show up in render, and other fun stuff.
I had finished the first six seconds of my character wlking into the room and standing infront of a desk. Next, she is going to set down, so I saved out the cho to import and embed in a new project. I did this because I didn’t want to screw up the work I had so far. It seems that saving out the cho was my downfall. Even though I re-embeded it in the new project, it crashes every few minutes no mater what I’m doing; saving, clicking a mode button, clicking on screen, etc. I went back to the good project and saved it under a new name, but I get the same result. So, any thoughts?
I was using A:M on a Mac, but went to a PC because A:M isn’t supporting Macs well and PCs are much faster for the money. I also found out that A:M works a bit differently on the PC and I preffer it. I use a Toshiba P20 laptop with a 3.2 ghz P4 and an Nvidia GeForceFX5200 Go card with 64 meg DDR memory. It’s quite a rocket after my Mac G4/400. 
While I’m at it, how can I delete the walking to the desk part and start at time 00:00 with her sitting down? And how the heck do you change the cho length and get it to stay. Every time I add an action, the cho lengthens, as expected, but after I blend the actions, I want to shorten the cho to fit the timing, but it won’t stay!!!
Maya is a posibility, but for now I am a studio of 1. I am keeping an eye on Animation Mentor which is on online cg animation school that is bundled with Maya.
Wowa. If your having troubles with Animation Master’s Non Liniar editing. . . DO NOT SWITCH APPS! Most other apps don’t even come close to AM in that area. I used to use action blending all the time in 8.5 and it worked very predictably. I can’t answer your specific questions because it has been a LONG time since I have used those features.
The gras is NOT greener on the other side for what your trying to do my friend. Sorry. :-/
Thanks for the info Wegg. I din’t realize that action blending was anything unusual. The only other apps I’ve used are Poser 3 and Strata StudioPro. How do you do things like adding a hand wave in the middle of a walk cycle in other apps? I have thought of going back to 8.5, another A:Mer sent it to me the last time I threatened to quite, but I wonder if it is more stable than 10.5. I also don’t now if I want to spend the next few weeks redoing my project in 8.5, only to find out it doesn’t work.
I have to admit that I’m at a low point right now, but I am determined to get through it. I want to animate, even if it’s just for myself, and I don’t care what software I use as long as it helps me get the job done.
Well in AM you just create a new hand action for your model. . . drop it onto your model in the cho and position it where you would like the hand wave to happen and maybe animate the influence it has over the motion “below” it. If it doesn’t look quite right you can always pop back over to the action and tweak it a little. Pop back to Cho and see what that did. Done.
In Messiah. You have to load up your scene making sure it has NO animation, create a group for the bones and nulls that control your model, animate a hand motion. Create a motion clip for that group. Save the motion clip. Close the scene, load up your walk scene, re-create the group EXACTLY as you did in the motion clip, create a new track in the Compose tab. Load in your clip, select the track and add the clip to the track. Make sure to turn off any translating bones, make sure that the clip was added to the right group. Then move it to where you want it in the timeline and pick the blending mode till it looks right. Heaven help you if you screwed up or don’t like the results cause. . . you’d pretty much have to go back and do that all over again.
Trust me. . . AM is 1000 X more intuative. Anyone who tells you different has never used it to it’s fullest.
Sigh, so what you’re saying Wegg is that I already have the best 3D app for what I’m doing, except that I am having a lot of trouble keeping it running. :argh:
:sad: Sorry.
Hound tech support and talk about your problems openly in here. Nothing will change if you just sit in your kitchen animating. . . ALONE!
Ok, thanks Wegg, good advice. I don’t have much faith in Hash support, I seem to have a lot of problems they can’t reproduce, but I have learned a bit from the forum today that has helped. And I don’t animate in the kitchen, way too noisy with 2 kids running around. I work inthe basement where it is cool and quiet.
Well in AM you just create a new hand action for your model. . . drop it onto your model in the cho and position it where you would like the hand wave to happen and maybe animate the influence it has over the motion “below” it. If it doesn’t look quite right you can always pop back over to the action and tweak it a little. Pop back to Cho and see what that did. Done.
Wowa. If your having troubles with Animation Master’s Non Liniar editing. . . DO NOT SWITCH APPS! Most other apps don’t even come close to AM in that area. I used to use action blending all the time in 8.5 and it worked very predictably.
Billy, THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH for the KIND words.
You the MAN!!
And Graham,
If there is anything that I can help you with, please don’t hesitate to ask.
A:M Rocks,
Greg Rostami
I agree, blender is coming along nicely ! I don’t want to offend anybody here in this A:M forum but there are some nice samples to evaluate the current quality blender is capable of.Most users of other packages thinks that because blender is free it must be crappy and thats totally false ! It’s very stable, comes with NLA support, has nice fur and YafRay kicks ass !
Some Animations :
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blenderaki/Zasz_180.exe
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blenderaki/final_Face_c.avi
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blenderaki/Head.exe
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blenderaki/final_Dart_c.avi
http://www.blender3d.org/_media/gallery/movies/mindfields_low_osx.avi
Or watch the awesome SIGGRAPH Demo
http://blender3d.com/%7Ebart/siggraph_movie.avi
Some Stills :
Here the newest versions (2.34) :
98/ME/2000/XP
http://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.34/blender-2.34-windows.exe
http://download.blender.org/release/yafray.0.0.7/yafray-0.0.6-7-win.zip
Mac OS X 10.2
http://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.34/blender-2.34-OSX-10.2-powerpc.dmg
http://download.blender.org/release/yafray.0.0.7/yafray-0.0.7.pkg.zip
Mac OS X 10.3
http://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.34/blender-2.34-OSX-10.3-powerpc.dmg
http://download.blender.org/release/yafray.0.0.7/yafray-0.0.7.pkg.zip
Linux i386 2.2.5
http://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.34/blender-2.34-linux-glibc2.2.5-i386.tar.gz
http://download.blender.org/release/yafray.0.0.7/yafray-0.0.7-2.i386.rpm
Documentation
http://download.blender.org/documentation/BlenderManualIen.23.pdf.zip ([size=3]a must have !!!)[/size]
http://download.blender.org/release/Publisher2.25/PublisherUserDoc.pdf
Some blender files to play with
http://download.blender.org/demo/test/test234.zip (feature samples)
http://download.blender.org/release/yafray.0.0.7/test007.zip (YafRay samples)
http://blenderchar.weirdhat.com/models/blendo.zip (rigged character)
and don’t forget to visit this sites :
www.blender.org
http://blenderchar.weirdhat.com/
http://www.enricovalenza.com/
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blenderaki
http://www.artificial3d.com/
http://www.blenderwars.com
Bertha (a blender & A:M user)
I thought I’d post s followup. I figured out what the problem was. I spent a half hour recording what I was doing when A:M crashed. It crashed 6 times. With a little deductive reasoning and intuative guessing, I figured out that a model that had it’s draw mode set to “not show” in the PWS was the problem. Once I set it to show, all has been fine now for several hours. Testing my hypothisis with another model confirmed this.
Now I’m happy to be able to work in A:M again, but I’m shaking my head at how such a simple thing can bring the app down. Unfortunatly, this is very typical of A:M. BTW Dearmad, I am using 10.5.
Thanks to all for the support and suggestions, and thanks to Bertha Big for posting the Blender stuff, very cool. Even IF A:M keeps working, I want to give Blender a try to see how to model in polys.
Graham, glad i could help ! I also use A:M (11.0m) but i seem to have the talent for crashing it every 10 minutes or so. I hardly get anything done. This was the main reason for me to look into Blender. At first i was totally lost by the strange UI but i gave it a few days of serious work and now i really start loving it. Don’t expect a workflow like in A:M (the only reason i didn’t returned A:M to Crash Inc.) but the results are quite rewarding ! The Yafray Renderer is great ! It has awesome quality and speed. There will be a new Blender Release 2.34 in the next days with a lot of new features. Beginners should take their time to get used to the ‘funny’ interface and search for samples and docs. I also use Wings 3D and both programs work perfectly together. I still hope that Hash will work on stability and render speed because A:M is really fun to use !
There is a nice (fully rigged) character to play with :
http://blenderchar.weirdhat.com/models/blendo.zip
and visit the character animation site
http://blenderchar.weirdhat.com/
Bertha
Graham said that he was using version 10.5. I am as well.
Will Hash inc. even look at bug and crash reports form 10.5 now that they have moved to 11?
If they don’t why bother to send in the report?
Anyway…
I was going to give up A:M long ago because I am a bit fed up with it crashing as it does but…
I have yet to figure out how to model with polygons.
I have found it quite a challenge to adjust to polygons.
I even own a copy of MAX and I can’t even get past it’s user interface yet.
It’s frustrating too because right here at CgTalk I see so many great models that were created with polygons and many of them with MAX.
I think to myself: How do these artists create these models from boxes??? Its amazing to me. I think I’ll figure it out soon enough though.
I think that A:M is a WONDERFUL program and I still use it a lot but it still does crash way too much (especially during modeling).
Hash really still needs to zero in on and fix those (now legendary) crashing issues.
The “I love it . . . but” attitude is pretty common among users of any software.
I love After Effects BUT. . . I HATE it’s animation controls. It’s motion curves are the most un-intuative pile of poo I have ever had to deal with. I ALWAYS run up against it and always have to come back to it because there is nothing else out there that produces cleaner/faster results that I have found.
I love Messiah BUT. . . I HATE it’s workflow and goofy method of applying “tools” and “modifiers” etc.
I love Lightwave BUT. . . I hate it’s interface, it’s material editor, it’s modeler. . . hmm. . . maybe I don’t love lightwave.
I think the point is. . . A:M is not unique in it’s quirks. I think most users in here are here because they believe A:M is the diamond in the rough. . . and that it’s quirks are worth putting up with for it’s other attributes.
Hang in there. Develop a relationship with the support people at Hash. . . and let us help you when we can.
You should visit www.3dbuzz.comThey have free (video) tutorials for beginners. Also check Michael Comet’s Web site (http://www.comet-cartoons.com) He has a lot of 3DSMax Tutorials & Scripts.
I found this great box modeling tutorial a while ago :
_Meissie_Head_Part_1/images/Final.jpg)
http://www.maxoncomputer.com/tutorial_detail.asp?tutorialID=142&site=
http://www.maxoncomputer.com/tutorial_browse.asp?category=PROJECTS
They use Cinema 4D in this tutorial but you should be able to apply it to every other package as well.
I’m not a techno geek. I can’t recreate the steps before the crashs occur. Most of the time i simply use UNDO or do a Quickrender and KABOOM ! They don’t even bother to test the weekly patches with the project files from the CD ! (remember the particle samples or rigid bodys a few releases ago ?). And what about the cloth feature ? I never got it to work without crashing. And still i won’t give up on Hash ! (at least until the end of this year 
) but you can’t blame someone to look for alternatives !
Bertha
No I can’t. I use other software all the time. Wings3D is my baby. But I can’t take your suggestions to other packages over A:M seriously because I can see that you are not an animator.
The name on the box. “Animation Master”.
Its not “Model Master”
“Cloth Master”
"Particle collision working every release Master. . . "
If Graham Clark was trying to do flying logo’s for his church. . . or get a job as a poly-modeler. . . AM wouldn’t be for him and I’d honestly suggest he go elsewhere.
But he is trying to tell stories on his own with characters.
There isn’t a better tool out there for that. Period.
I was asking before if Hash only investigates bug and crash reports for only its latest version.
Do they?
Because if they only support the latest version then me developing a relationship with the developers won’t amount to anything. It would be a waste of thier time and mine since I am using 10.5. There is no relationship to be had until I upgrade.
Maybe so but catagorize a legitimate gripe as an “I love it but…” attitiude is not looking at that situation as it really is.
Yes, I read through alot of the forums here of software I do not own and I do see that the grass is not really greener on the other side and I dabble with MAX enough to say A:M is the way I’d prefer to go… even with A:M’s issues.
But that does not mean that I should lower my expectations of A:M as I fight the fight and hang in there awaiting for it to stabilze.
No way.
I think that the best thing I can do right now is to keep working with it as I am now. I won’t be upgrading though until I know its much more stable.
I agree with the notion that A:M is a diamond in the rough. As I said before it is a wonderful program (maybe even brilliant). It is a really well thought out software package.
But right now this diamond that we call A:M needs a bit of polishing. And it needs polishing in some critical areas.
Personally, I really don’t mind minor buggieness as long as it does not prevent me from working. I don’t even mind the occasional crash or two. Constant crashing is another issue though and that’s really the ONLY thing that I don’t like about A:M.
I wish that I had the time and dedication to sit at my computer with a pen and paper to notate exactly what I did my A:M crashed and be able to repeat the process to see if its a repeatable phenomenon but I don’t.
Right now, I am using version 10.5 and I just work through the crashes. They are still bearly bearable for now. But these crashes have lingered around so many years now I really wonder if stability is an acknowleged priorty within the walls of Hash Inc.
Wegg, I’m all for doing what I can to help make A:M a better product than it is but aside from bug reports I am not sure what a user like me really can do to help.
Do you have any thoughts about that that you care to share?
Bertha, thank you for the links.
Well you should upgrade for a start. Hash Inc. would be crazy to try and support lots of different branches of it’s software. I’m using 11 right now and I have only crashed twice today. Been using it all day. I’d say thats pretty damn stable.
Other than that . . . keep posting crash reports. “It crashed when I did this”. If they ask for the .prj and you have time great. I agree that it SUCKS to have to be a beta testor to software you paid for but. . . that will never change.
I second that. I’ve been sending bug reports into Hash for the last few months for v11 and I’ve been sending less and less recently. You should also specify what problems your having on as many forums as possible to get the most people helping you.
But honestly, coming from a formerly bald v9 user 
, I can’t fault the latest version. Oh and it’s only $99 to upgrade still. 
BTW you were having trouble making the timeline “stick” in the chor…you have to alter the size of the “blue bar” to do it.