to develop tools for a 3D animated film that we produced at Vinton Studios
You mean āWillā Vinton studios? Iām a bit late as I only found out about the studio at Christmas when I watched Return to Oz on TV. The animation was simply brilliant and Iām surprised it didnt win the VFX Oscar for 1985. :shrug:
Oh well, back to the topic at hand I supposeā¦
Ah, 
Found a link at Danimatorās page.
http://3dfool.blogspot.com/2008/01/3d-television.html
Yes thats the same Will Vinton. They were bought out by Phil knight of Nike, and renamed LAIKA. They are doing a stop motion 3D feature right now called āCoralineā
Yes, I know that you will use it rarely, but it is sometimes needed. I remember us doing this a lot here at a 3ds- MAX production house, where we did not have any built in tools for this back in the days (its been about 8 years now).
Personally I havent done any stereoscopic stuff since then, but I have checked the tools in LW and they work sufficiently well. As I and Danimator said, you can do this in LW with several techniques as well. I was not aware of a convergence setting. I only know of the workarround with targetting the Null. Danimator, can you point me to the location of that setting?
CU
Elmar
There is no setting for convergence, its either on or off depending if you have the camera targeted to a null. You will also need to disable the Pitch and Bank on the camera as convergance should only affect the heading. Its also a good idea to put you camera into a rig that will allow the movement to be speratly controled on other nulls. I like to build a vitural dolly and crane with my setups. This will get a more realistic camera in the end.
Wondering, anyone knows if glasses-free 3D televisions work the same way, so the LW stereoscopic-method can be used?
A stereo cam setup is not that difficult to set up.
1 Null with as childs a left eye cam and a right eye cam, with 8cm inbetween.
Having 2 cameras means you have to render 2 different scenes. If you use the stereo
function from LW it will render 2 eyes in 1 go.
The thing about 3D is you have to seperate MOST viewing methods from the generation method. Humans have two eyes, we see the world 3 Dimensionally from birth. two renders that replicate that view (in scale) is all you need. Once you have those two images, you can set them up to view in almost any format including glasses free 3D. Many of those systems will work better with more than one stereo pair, but can do amazing things with just one pair.
Remember, LW stereo rendering is workable for any system be it Print, anaglyph, porlarized, real-d, dolby 3d, IMAX 3D, Sensio, Feild Sequntial, Pulfrich, etc. There is no new stereo technology. Stereo hasnāt changed since the civil war when the photgraphed battelfileds in 3D. We still have two eyes and thats all you need to do is recreate that. The only thing that has improved is the method of delivery (projection) and the knowledge of how to set it up.
Thanks,
that basically answered my question
Itād be cool to test this some day
Home-made 3D
http://www.scec.org/geowall/
Iām not sure if reed3d sells other than wholesale anymore. A few varieties of non-paper 3D glasses can be found at:
http://www.rainbowsymphony.com/3d-glasses.html
I use mostly colour anaglyph with red/cyan paper glasses for gallery installations, CDs, etc. (I buy them by the truckload :)) although I did my Masterās thesis project with LCD shutter glasses and images rendered with the Lightwave Stereo rendering.
OK, so now I have these two images from the stereo option in Lightwave, what settings in the other App. (normal, screen, overlay, etc,) do I use to to comp them together ?
E.
If your in Orlando swing by the Dave School to see this stuff in actionā¦they are currently working on an animated short using this technology.
Unfortunetly, I wonāt be getting to Orlando any time soon. I mean, I understand the whole null convergance thing, itās just the whole settings problem I canāt crack. Cāmon, somebody has to have done thisā¦
E.
Hereās another site I found that sells 3d Glasses - all types - and nicer plastic ones as well:
Ok once you have your Left eye and right eye images your all set. Now you just have to decide what you can afford to view these in 3D. I will cover these in order of complexity and expense. Most methods require you to use either Photoshop to affect a few images or a compositing application to affect a long sequence.
[ol]
[li]Freeview and cross eye. You simply place the two images next to each other and allow your eyes to diverge or cross. I find crossed eyes method the easiest to accomplish. Just place the right eye image on the left side of the screen, and left on the right, cross your eyes and allow yourself to focus on the blurring image in the middle. Once locked on you will see beatiful 3D in full color.[/li][li]Anaglyphic. This is a very cheap and easy method, but it does limit the color as your using color channels to seperate the two eyes. IN photoshop simply copy the Red channel from the left eye and replace the red channel in the right eye image. In Fusion, Shake or Aftereffects you can swap the channels using boolean or channel reorder operations. Red/Cyan glasses are best for color retention. Red/Green work well for Black and White images. You can get these glasses from many internet shops for around .40 cents a pair. http://www.rainbowsymphony.com/[/li][li]LCD Shutter glasses. You can get a pair of 60hz shutter glasses for video around $70 http://www.razor3donline.com/ With these you can create a image sequnce that interlaces two images left and right into one image with Field 1 being the left eye and Field two being the right. When played back on a DVD VHS or any NTSC signal on a CRT based monitor (DOES NOT WORK ON PLASMA, LCD or HD) you get a pretty solid 3D image[/li][li]Polarized Projection This setup will cost several Thousand dollars. You will need specialized software, a media server to feed the projectors, or dual dvd machine sthat are interlocked. Also you need two projectors bother with poloarizing filters set to 45 and 90 degrees and a silver painted non depolarizing screen. Also poloarized glasses. It takes alot of calibrating, but this will give a fantastic expirence. Be carful of light levels, as you loose almost 60% of your light from all the filtering.[/li][li]3D Dlp Television. I have just got one of these. Samsung makes DLP based HD set that can display 120 images persecond at full HD. Using special flicker free Shutterglasses, and a HTPC feeding your set, you get truly amazing 3D display in your home.[/li][/ol]
Hopefully that will give you some ideas on how to view your 3D animations in stereo. Iām putting together some tutorials on my website soon that will go a lot deeper into the techniques I was trying to describe above.
I thought I would chime in here, I help develop the work flow that the Dave school uses. We use option 5 in the above post using the Samsung DLP TV. Workes great, we have a 32bit quadcore hooked up to it and using a sterioscopic player to stitch them together in real time from two seperate video files.
when testing the eye sep in AE or fustion we use anagyph glasses (Donāt wear them too long as it temporarly screws up your color vision) in AE we just use the effect that comes with the software in fusion we use a simple node setup that I canāt remeber off the top of my head that does the same thing. Iāve found that a AE work flow workes better while doing sterio but really you can use either or.
Right now I think one of our students uses he built on his own for the project they are working on to do eye sep and convergence. the only downside is that it uses two seperate cameras thus has to be brokenout seperatly. However you almost HAVE to do it this way if your using render buffer export as RBE does not currantly support the sterio toggel in the camera pannel. I usally mannually break out my passes and donāt use RBE because they are only 8bit images anyway.
Iāve passed along a sterio wish list to NT I hope gets looked at in the near furture because we do see a lot of that stuff thesedays and helps to have all advantages you can get.
I hope that makes sence to yāall
OK, this may be really stupid. I had an idea that if you went ahead and used the two camera setup,(shot the sequence twice @8cm camera distance), then used spotlight projected image sequences, spots at the same distance as the original cameras, then reshot the combined images with a third camera onto a flat plane, couldnāt you use the polarized glasses we got for free at Beowulf to view the 3D image? ( Yeah, probably really stupid idea).
E.
Does anyone know the exact technique used on Beowulf to get the non red/blue 3D effect?
Is this something we can do in Lightwave and if so how? (I kept the sunglass looking grey 3D glasses from the movie for testing hoping to find out how to do this myself) I have the red/blue glasses but they still distort the color way too much for my liking, thats why I love these sunglass type 3D glasses like the Beowulf movie and some Universal Studios thrill rides use.
I tried Googling and found it uses Real-D tech, but couldnāt find anything explaining exactly how it works so I could recreat it in Lightwave.
Any help is much appreciated.
