There is something wrong with the london eye, it looks pretty big, spent ages looking at the photo it is really bothering me. I too work in London, It does not come halfway higher than the saatchi gallery and Big Ben is smaller than it . Big Ben looks tiny in comparison, also it is at the wrong angle to big ben. It would look taller from the south bank but is shot from the north bank.
I am sorry but sticking my neck out on the line, I am asking for your original file.
I am one of the few photographers in the country that is a freelance forensic photogrraphic examiner. Your original plate looks strange… Unless you shot on a wide angle and there is no evidence of that.
The picture has not been flipped, the geography is wrong, The london eye is not parallel with the bend in the river. It is straight on. I have done a line of sight check, you are shooting from Holborn from the corner of Russell Square Over the Victoria and albert. If so you should be looking at the eye edge on. It should be smaller. You have wide angle barrelling at the bottom, long lens compression on the left, and wide angle variation on the right. Also the eye is ovoid than circular.
I have never ever done this on this forum before, your integrety is in question, please may I have copy of the original photo, then I can check the metadata for myself. I have a feeling that something is awry here.
Is the original plate a montage or contrived panoramic? :hmm:
Richard Cave
Rockhopper VFX