I’ve been exploring my own process recently; a valuable resource has been Robert Genn’s book “The painter’s keys”. (www.painterskeys.com: this guy has a free newsletter that is absolutely fantastic as well.)
Nonetheless, I think you need a system that allows you to adjust your process to the problem at hand. Having no system tends to reinforce established patterns. Having a rigid step-by-step process always ends up with really stale crap. The goal of my system is to always be “in the zone”. Instead of “thinking”, you create, and then analyze for the next obvious idea. “Let the work tell you what it needs”, so to speak.
A valuable resource is a list of the different visual aspects you find interesting. You can start with the basic ones, contrast, lost and found line, pattern, etc., but just keep a list around. If you ever get stuck, just pick one obvious thing off the list that you want to establish better. Work it in a thumbnail if the primary work is too far along. Thumbnails are nice, because they’re small, and can only take like 10 minutes to work. And you can bash away at them.
The key here is avoiding “thinking”, where you’re spacing out and wondering how to make things better. If you don’t know what to do, you’re not going to find out by thinking about it.
Of course, if you’re like me, running out of steam happens with more frequency then I’d like to admit. So burn it, delete the crap, and move on. (Or move it to a folder for “crap” and forget about your mistakes.) The whole process is liberating, once you can get past being too “precious” about what you’re doing.