Cinema 4d users to XSI Foundation?


#28

not sure i follow. you can do partial cuts. or do you mean you want a counter for doing x edges rather than % of the loop?


#29

thereabout… a counter that allows me to precise define the distance between one of the two edges of the polygon and the newly created edge :slight_smile:

heres a sketch:

would be great to see this in one of the next releases :slight_smile:

best regards
jannis


#30

oh, you’re not talking about partial loops, but the offset, sure it’s possible. the only thing is working out where 0m is.


#31

wow plenty of responses on here.
i know really what c4d can do and r9 just looks killer to me…as someone mentioned modelling + MS, ngons and subpolydisp is just funky…the speed, stability and quality is there no doubt…i’m slightly worried about missing my xfrog, ditools,jenna combination…use them alot…

btw mdme_sadie…does this mean you are writing MS for xsi? heh heh.
also how have you found the move…i know you’re technically way out there than me…but i’d love to hear of your thoughts/experiences with it if possible…kinda a per take on the whole thing…MR is what really attracts me i think if i put it on my list and the shader setup.

tony: i’ll take a look at that book bud…cheers.

thalaxis: yeah i agree with ya bud…the whole maxon situation thing has really disillusioned me in someway…and i don’t think feasibly i can retain my investment in both…the thought of having to upgrade both seems a bit mad…maybe keep c4d core for my plugs…then export by objects.


#32

Per and a few of us already discussed our views about a C4D/XSI comparison a lot in the following thread:
http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?t=161887

but I wouldn’t trust me, sheep or Dave if they paid me to trust us.
Per was spot on tho.


#33

thanks bud i’ll take a lookie and see…
cheers


#34

The only thing that I’m disappointed about in v9 is the fact that they didn’t upgrade the shader toolset.

Now that I know how much it’s going to cost, I’m definitely planning to get it; I’m quite pleased with it overall. But I’m probably also going to get XSI because of this deal, and hope that Maxon rises to the challenge down the road.

Just watch Maxon introduce a new module for compositing and make the upgrade thing even more complicated next year :wink:


#35

Hey all you C4D/XSI users… I am trying to pull camera animation from a C4D scene and was wondering if anyone has some tips to share for getting accurate results. I’ve been trying the .fbx format, but am finding that there are some quarks in the plugin. I have had great success with similar tasks using .fbx from LW/Maya/Max to XSI, but I fear the plugin for C4D is sub-par.

Is a dotXSI or other full transfer format available for C4D? If I had LW I would have the guy try a .lwo export, but unfortunately I won’t be able to open it… and deep exploration is not an option.

Any thoughts?

Cheers


#36

what problems with fbx bit in c4d are you having problems with? seems strange i was always lead to believe…but then this is always a bad way to comment on something…but i was always led to believe the bridge was very good between the two…

xml data can be exported from c4d is this would be any help? not that i know much about what to do with it…i would have said use lightwave export…but you got problems with that.
dunno…sorry bud.


#37

well, i have to admit i don’t tend to use XSI much in depth seeing as most of my focus these days is on plugin writing, c4d’s SDK is a little gem so i tend to focus there. as for MS for XSI… well, not until a lot of radical changes take place within the XSI SDK, currently it’s just not possible.

xsi as an app from a users perspective. i’m afraid all i can say is that it depends user to user. try out the demos/experience versions. if you really like it, then don’t let other people sway you from getting it, if you dislike it, then equally don’t be a victim of peer group pressure. it’s your money spend it on what makes the most sense to you.

right now it seems like it’s a great deal, though it is as far as i have seen a non upgradeable verison, and considerably less feature rich than the experience version. however it’s still a powerful app, but don’t expect more than in the demos.


#38

Could you give some details, what radical changes would that be ? So XSI’s SDK is limiting you writing complex plugins, such as MeshSurgery or Storm Tracer ? If so, could you give some examples of the limitations.

Thanks


#39

It is upgradable, according to SoftImage customer service.


#40

simply put XSI has very little in regards to handling the gui.

writing something with previews and viewport interaction like MS would need somebody to also write a graphical frontend to it that would be hosted in a CDH.
simply not worth the ridiculous effort.

XSI’s SDK is a valid pipeline tool and stuff like the CDH is unprecedented, but it doesn’t help much if you are writing userfriendly and funky plugins (altho it’s getting better every version).


#41

I’ve just received this email :


#42

He flingster,

I’ve been using C4D for the last year now after the advice of a friend. Started 3D with it. I really enjoyed learning and working with it. I learned the principles of 3D a lot faster then I would have with any of the other packages I think. Mainly because of it’s ease of use (allthough that might be debatable, to each it’s own flavour), but mostly through it’s excellently written manuals. Which i read and reread a couple of times.

After a years use, I come to the conclusion that the most important thing C4D lacks for me is a connection to a photorealistic renderer of the level of MR. C4D’s own renderer while very good at photorealistic stills, just doesn’t seem to cut it at photorealistic animation. I just I haven’t seen any studiolevel photorealistic animation that was directly rendered out of C4D’s own renderer.

So now that XSI sells foundation with MR, with 5 supposedly very well produced training DVD’s, for about 450 euros. This is really a no brainer for me.
You get access to a studiolevel photorealistic renderer with the info on how to use it.

Even though I think C4D’s new R9 features are great. To me they only extent C4D toolset but not the quality of the final rendered image which is of final importance I think.

So yes I’ll place my order here at Avid belgium first hour on monday.

cheers


#43

They told me that they plan to update the entire product line, including Foundation, down the road, and implied that upgrading it would cost as much as purchasing it.

They also told me that you could upgrade to Essentials (or Advanced) for the price difference.


#44

c4D to Xsi… I feel myself a little bit out from the current mood :blush: … I choose c4D as valid companion for some specific tasks (jdex, I use .fbx… works pretty pretty good)… also until for the moment it costs just $500… bring it… nothing to add… when it’s not a money problem… there’re not other problems :D… you’ve not to abdicate your religion, cultural imprinting, not to say bye bye to your family, not to lose your cheerfulness… not to betray your old mate or the mother of your kids, and not to get your vote to bush :)… but just to be ready(and proud) to change your mind a bit, to get a more open(aboveboard) point of view about 3D, to see yourself and your work under a different angle, to grow on your personal skills (instead to grant all the responsibilities to your software) and generally to lose some redundant opinions, to get instead some fundamental knoweledges… ehy!!.. how could you resist to get these things for just 500 dollars… xsi included ?!

ciao
francesca


#45

heh heh maybe you’ve seen some of my recent posts on the c4d forum…unhappy bunny.
i agree with you totally… its not a life threatening decision, its not something i should guilty or sad about, its not something i should feel i have to do, its something i should do if it suits me and my work…500 dollars financially is not a major issue…the commitment in time and learning is far more i guess and a decision i have to be happy with really.
I’m just trying to get a feel for what can be done, and how things will pan out if i do move over…expanding ones horizon is a good thing, but it has to feel comfortable for my mind…heh heh…cheers.


#46

What I would like to know is the plugin/scripting activily of XSI. C4D has always had a very active plugin/scripting community, often sharing their efforts for little or no cost. My perception of XSI is that is would be less so mainly due to the fact that it is used mainly in big studios where there is copyright/nda agreements or a lack of time to contribute. I think the ne price point will change this, but can you XSI’ers infomr me better?


#47

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.