I bought XSI Foundation 4 back in the day but started to doubt if Softimage would survive so I started all over in the decisionmakingprogress of deciding for which application I would go put the time and effort in to learn. It would be either Maya or XSI for me and from a software standpoint I just liked XSI better. It just appeared to be superior in workflow and the (no destructive) concept behind it. But getting education and jobs with Maya would be a lot easier.
I just saw so much approvement every release in comparision with Maya and after 3 releases they were still around so when Softimage offered Foundation users an upgrade at halfprice to the Essentials version I made up my mind and went for XSI.
I’m not sure if the takeover is all bad. Like another poster said, it might be easier for XSI-users to be integrated into a Maya-pipeline within studios. Furthermore I am hoping that Autodesk training facilities will also offer XSI courses. I don’t have the fear of Softimage just going out of business leaving me with obsolete skills, I rather live with the fear that it is getting incorporated in the long run into an industry standard 3D application.
I agree that new features in XSI might be more limited than when it was with SI but just getting some of the current stuff from other packages like the nParticles/nCloth/fluidstuff from Maya would be nice along with better integration of other products of theirs like Mudbox and Motionbuilder. At least the chance of getting that into XSI has increased.
I really think XSI users should look at the bigger picture here; I’m afraid it’s more a question of survival than it is of having a choice and in that light I think Autodesk is the best candidate to be taking over SI.
The only thing I’m worried about is the 2 year subscription I took. Very curious how that will work out.