I think we are all dying to know your process. Mostly because we would like to incorporate this master stroke into our own work if we can. Its fantastic! I need to work on drawing women too.
Very very good. My hat is off to you.
Ailill And Roksana, Linda Bergkvist (2D)
Beautiful work! On a much higher plain than some of the other 2D “painters” that recieve a silly amount of undeserved arse licking.
It is Wow ! I wanna know how did u do yhis job . It is so amazing .\
so love it ! 
Good luck ![]()
But I guess you got some really sick and twisted mind to be able to paint something like that…
Then I must be sick as well, cause I find them sooooo beautiful. Even sexy. I wish Linda made a 5000x5000 or whatever resolution pic so I could make a roksana poster to my wall.(Linda if you read this, please…
)
incredible. You have color sense like nothing i’ve ever witnessed. They look like manipulated photographs (meant as a compliment). I do however dislike is Ailill’s background. It has the feeling of a poorly compressed jpg to me, while the rest of the painting has a painterly feel. I think I have fallen in love with Roksana :love:. Her eyes enchant me. Great work.
:drool::buttrock:
:eek: the air and hand look like a photography… really one of the best painted-portrait I´ve seen lately… and the beauty of his face… well… to fall in love…:arteest:
I’ve watched your art on deviantart over the time and have always found it very hard to take in that you really painted “everything” in the picture. I discussed this with other artists, and while some agreed, others said to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Then I showed this picture (these two actually) to those who disagreed with me on this topic, without giving your name, and they all said it looks like you touched up a photo. Im sorry but theres no way in hell, that the red hair in that picture, or the eyes on the bottom girl are really painted. =/ sorry but I won’t believe it for a second, because 1, ive seen a lot of your other stuff and some looks totally painted…and this just looks like a photomanip.
I don’t want any “messages” back from you telling me it is, because im not convinced, and it’s kind of sad to see artist use photo’s in their art.
I hope I don’t get bashed from this, but i’ve just seen way too many artist get hype and glory for something they didn’t put 100% effort into, while other artist suffer from art they do.
And by the way, the hair on the back of the girl, first pic, looks like it was res’d up and lost quality, and the lips on the first girl have photograin in them. 
Bye
I must say I fell in love with the first one straight away, even from the thumbnail on the front page. I think both portraits are very beautiful and ofcourse the level of detail is so incredible that I fear I might get an allergic reaction from watching your stuff (too good
grmmmblllll) … another one asked about the process, whether reference was used and stuff like that and I’d probably be interested in that too ;o if I had to point out anything though, it kinda looks like the edges of the redhead’s hair are really blurry, and also the not-as-dark-as-above-her-eyes left side
ügj
(über)
Stunningly beautiful!
Those eyes are mesmerizing.
Very nice texture on the skin as well.
Good hand anatomy.
Well, you did it again. Hail Linda. :bowdown:
Btw, I love your D’Artiste book. Your an inspiration to us all.
How does it feel to be considered LITERALLY one of the best in the world?
I really love the first piece. Pretty girl. The second piece shows you how women really are sometimes. They look sweet and sexy but then they take a bite into your neck and kill you. hehehehe ![]()
That second picture is so spooky, I love it! Both amazing paintings, I’m always in awe at how you achieve such realistic and beautiful skin tones.
My new backdrop :).
stoo
Absolutely amazing, your approach is extremely photorealsitic, and both works are absolutely stupendous.
:bowdown:
Just let me know when your book comes out. I’m getting it for sure. Great work!!!:bowdown:
)