it’s just an animation sure, but its turning into your cliche ninja flick, im just tired of seeing ninja represented in such a way in 99 percent of dramatic representation. lightening up has nothing to do with it, the fact of the matter is im just passionate about the subject. i take no offense to anything that’s going on but my suggestions are only those to make the story stronger and unfortunately they conflict with the creators vision.
the depth of story is alittle thin, even tho it’s a short film, you want all the pieces to add up. especially in a one shot piece like this. you want everything to conclude and make sense. the ninja can get away sure that’s fine, hanzo can get shot and die that’s cool as well (although i would have him get shot in the stomach as it’s much more fatal than a leg wound) putting suki on a cool horse with a unique sword without any sort of substantiation that a woman in ancient japan could actually survive on her own without becoming a prostitute is hard to accept. showing a flashback to hanzo’s past that im sure alludes to how he became a wanted man is good but, the flashback concludes and in the version of the script i read you never find out what his crime was, so the flashback seems to be out of place, i would include a reference to this in the flashback even if it’s an audio as the flashback fades back into reality of hanzo goin nuts and murdering the heads of the clan give the act some motivation. because the knowledge of guns in ancient japan is debatable and the common man wouldn’t know alot about this sort of thing i will concede that you can get away with that inclusion in the short. the fact that you are willing to agree that it’s a flintlock pistol is also alot more believable than the “top secret long barrell scatter gun” proposed in the earlier concepts of the show.(look up samurai gun for the cheeziness factor on that idea)
in short
a whole bunch of “cool concepts” gathered together doesnt make a story great,…
background and character depth makes a story great.
this concludes my critique of the story