Fat Or Ntfs

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  05 May 2002
Fat Or Ntfs

I need to reinstall my OS microsoft NT.

What should I use for partition FAT or NTFS?

Also is it possible to have a bigger partition
than 2039 mb in FAT?

  05 May 2002
OK first off go with NTFS. It is way more efficient and reliable than FAT. Next, 2039 is the limit with FAT16, FAT32 can handle more but not FAT16, NTFS it dosen't matter. If you have an option to use something other than FAT always use the option. FAT is a leftover from the DOS days and basically sucks a$$.
1011010 1110010 1001111 0101101 0110001
In the end it all comes down to 0 and 1.
1011010 1110010 1001111 0101101 0110001
  05 May 2002
Wow thank's for the answer.

Let say that my original drive is c:
Now if I Install win NT on my new hard drive d:

I want to trash my c:
How can I know that my d: will boot.

Im scared that my computer will not boot because the system seem to boot from the c: even if I install win nt on the d:
  05 May 2002
If You install Win2K on d: drive leaving Win98 on c: you would be able to choose OS at the beginning of booting.

  05 May 2002
just a question......is NTFS compatible with all programms?
  05 May 2002
the hard disk formatting is invisible to most programs outside of the OS. The few programs I've run across that do care about the disk format only care for it to be NTFS (often on programs that require Win2000 or higher). The only program that really cares about how the harddisk is formatted is the OS.

Now, if you are using Windows NT, then you want to use NTFS (NTfile system) for your harddrive. If you are using Windows 2000, you want to use NTFS. If you are using Windows XP, you want to use NTFS. The only time you should use FAT32 is if you have no choice otherwise (like in Win 95, Win 98, and Win Me). The NTFS is better in all ways than the FAT system. If anything, your programs will thank you for switching to it.
1011010 1110010 1001111 0101101 0110001
In the end it all comes down to 0 and 1.
1011010 1110010 1001111 0101101 0110001
  05 May 2002
Its not all that black and white. Fat will give you faster performance, NTFS is more reliable and wastes less space.
Fat is also easier to work with if you dual boot.
  05 May 2002
true right, I have three partitions setup

a 5gig FAT for Windows 2000 :C

a 20 Gig NTFS for Programs

and a 30 Gig NTFS for Files :E

I don't know much about the details, but FAT is MUCH easier to recover, so I've been told everytime I have OS problems, which is essential, thats why I do Windows on that

Also having window in its seperate partiton is good because Windows constantly writes to itself as you use your comp, by keeping it seperate keep that info from becoming fragmented with the other stuff.

plus when it comes time to defragment you'll notice that your C drive needs it often, and your D and E very little.

this system has worked wonderfully, hope it helps

I feel I never told you
the story of the ghost
that I once knew and talked to
of whom I'd never boast
for this was my big secret
how I'd get ahead
and never have to worry
I'd call him instead

Last edited by Adam Klein : 05 May 2002 at 07:49 PM.
  01 January 2006
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.