Camera movement in 3D, are there rules ???

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

View Poll Results: Camera movement in 3D, are there rules ???
Never break the rules !!! 0 0%
You can break the rules in some cases !!! 12 100.00%
There are no rules in 3D !!! 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  07 July 2003
Question Camera movement in 3D, are there rules ???

What do you think ?

There are a few rules (or maybe limitations ?) in the real world, can or should you break these rules in 3D ?
I normally would stick to these rules, because in my opinion everything else, Ok maybe not everything else, just looks weird !

It would be great to see some of your work, where your broke these rules in purpose, or post some examples from the movies.

Last edited by robinson : 07 July 2003 at 04:23 PM.
 
  07 July 2003
Sure, go ahead and break some rules... as long as it's in good taste. There are some rules though that maybe should not be broken, like the 180 degree rule, because it just confuses the viewer. Hey, if nobody ever breaks any rules then progress is not possible.
__________________
Outside of a Dog, a book is Man's best friend..... Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. :drool:
 
  07 July 2003
Re: Camera movement in 3D, are there rules ???

Quote: Originally posted by robinson
can or should you break these rules in 3D ?

Can you? Yes. Should you? It depends on the shot you're after. In the real world, a camera is fixed to a tripod and moved on tracks, roaming via a steadycam, or just locked so that it can pan and tilt. These are the primary ways a camera moves (disregarding expensive motion control rigs). In 3D, you don't have these limitations. But often times, you try to mimic them so that the camera motion feels "natural." It's basically the same thing we do in post when we add film grain to our video footage to make it look more "natural." If you're trying to do something avant garde, go crazy. But if you're simply trying to tell a story, it's best to stick to traditional camera moves. Remember, if you call attention to the camera work for very long, it detracts from your characters and the script. The camera should disappear from the viewer's conscience, just like well orchestrated music. It shouldn't call attention to itself, but should augment what's happening on screen.

Just my 2-cents.

Steve
__________________
Author: ZBrush ZPipeline Guide for LightWave
Co-Author: Essential LightWave [8] / v9
Co-Author/Editor: LightWave Tips and Tricks

www.stevewarner.com
 
  01 January 2006
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.