| |||||
|
|
||||||
| To minimize the ads you see on this page create a CGTalk account and log in HERE | ||||||
|
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Anatomy Forum Leader
![]() Rebecca Kimmel
Teacher in LALA Land
Los Angeles,
USA
|
Oppose Orphan Works 2008 with a click of a button
Edit 1/5/09 - for the most up to date information on the Orphan Works issue, please subscribe to the official blog of the IPA:
___ UPDATE - 10/3/08 Please note that this first post has been edited with the most recent information. Comments posted to this thread reflect previous developments in this issue chronologically and may no longer be relevant to the post below which is the most recent: (thanks to dmedillus for posting at the end of this thread): Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Rebeccak : 01-05-2009 at 06:27 AM. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Anatomy Forum Leader
![]() Rebecca Kimmel
Teacher in LALA Land
Los Angeles,
USA
|
I sent the following form letter to Congress
----------
info. no longer relevant. __________________
Last edited by Rebeccak : 09-27-2008 at 09:53 AM. |
| |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Wanna-be
Robert Holmén
Dallas, Texas,
USA
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 800
|
Apparently no one senses the irony of a generation of artists who think it's their right to download, listen to, reuse and redistribute ("sharing") music they've never paid for now getting all wound up about this orphan copyright thing.
Irony or karma... could be either. There is a place for an orphan copyright consideration in the law that would greatly benefit artists doing historical work and research. Bombarding your congressperson with form e-mails will do little to make sure the law has the proper protections for your non-abandoned works. I'd urge everyone not to take the "Illustrators Partnership" explanation at its face, as it seriously misstates the realities of "orphan copyright" proposals that are being considered now. __________________
° Animator and voice o' the Scarecrow for The Tinwoodman of Oz the #1 Heavy Push on Youtube. I'm a 2D wannabe |
| |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Glowologist
![]() Andrew Melnychuk-Oseen
VFX Artist
Blur
Venice,
USA
|
Are there links for supporting this bill?
My cgportfolio is gonna be so sick 2 hours after this bill law thing goes through. Like 3000 more images sick....and then Im gonna sell it. |
| |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Modelo, ergo sum
Tim Duyzer
Master of Karate and Friendship
Hamilton,
Canada
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,886
|
Quote:
Hey buddy... even if everyone who is worried about the bill pirated music - and they don't - the two things are completely different legal issues. There's an obvious difference between pirating a song and using that song in a TV commercial without licensing it. A song that you can buy for a dollar on iTunes could cost $10k to license. There's a similar difference between sharing a jpg of a painting with your friends and using that painting in a magazine ad without permission. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Anatomy Forum Leader
![]() Rebecca Kimmel
Teacher in LALA Land
Los Angeles,
USA
|
----------
info. no longer relevant. __________________
Last edited by Rebeccak : 09-27-2008 at 09:53 AM. |
| |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Anatomy Forum Leader
![]() Rebecca Kimmel
Teacher in LALA Land
Los Angeles,
USA
|
double post
............. __________________
|
| |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
____________________
B S
Senior Artist
Oslo,
Norway
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,686
|
All I say is: Read up on orphan works before you say no. It may have some interesting ideas and is probably something that is not inherently evil. However I haven't read unbiased information about it yet to make a call... just yet.
Just saying. ~B __________________
Last edited by CGmonkey : 05-07-2008 at 05:59 PM. |
| |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
[Forum Leader]
![]() Roberto Ortiz
Illustrator/ Modeler
Washington DC,
USA
|
Ok I have compiled some resources that ALL artists should read before they say "we jumped" the gun.
BTW I am 100% against this bill. To learn more about the Orphan Works Bill, listen to the interview with Brad Holland:
MISC:Places to avoid:(In my humble opinion) Radio Free Meredith (She is spreading mis-information left and right) __________________
LW FREE MODELS:FOR REAL Home Anatomy Thread FXWARS:Daily Sketch Forum:HCR Modeling This message does not reflect the opinions of the US Government Last edited by RobertoOrtiz : 05-07-2008 at 06:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
working on it...
Linda Smith
na
United States
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,202
|
I popped up a link to this in my DA journal and also a thread in the DA forums. Hope it helps gain support in opposing this bill.
|
| |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Veteran
David Higgins
BA
Australia
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 40
|
Maybe I am missing something here but the bill seems to cover only those items where the item in question is 'Orphaned' ie where a copyright owner cannot be established. My own personal view is that if I create a work that I value then I would have no hesitation copyrighting it. If I did not value that work enough to actually copyright it then why should I complain if someone else values it enoguh to use it for any purpose? BUT I guess applying commonsense to such an emotive topic is probably just asking for trouble.....
|
| |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Waiting for pixels to dry
PT
Artist / Illustrator
Lead Freelancer
Netherlands
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,036
|
Quote:
Ehm, your work is *automaticly* copyrighted as soon as you created it. I don't need to go anywhere to "actually copyright" it. Imagine the case where someone just crops a picture to leave out any mark or autograph and then says "Well, nope, can't identify the original owner" But that is the basic premises of this bill. (I know this case is probably covered for in the bill...I hope!) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Realist
![]() Joseph Harford
Creative Director
whitehot
Worcester,
United Kingdom
|
Would you really want to leave all your ' no good ideas, and work ' unregistered in a case like this?. Ideas that you didn't value, or images that you didn't believe were worth anything.
I know in the aftermath of work, we sometimes overlook sketches, ideas, writings or images that were really good, in search of something better. I don't want a situation where I have to register everything, especially at a cost, and of course not either where I overlook registering an image only to have it lost, orphaned and making money. Regarding the 'everything you do is auto copyrighted', isn't this what this bill is standing to negate? If I crop of the C logo and sell it before someone notices, appearing oblivious to its previous ownership, I stand to be fully within my right. That's outrageous. __________________
CGChain Community : http://www.cgchain.com Portfolio & Blog : http://www.josephharford.com Follow me on Twitter : @Harford @CGChain |
| |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
esc is key
![]() Richard Cabrera
Media Developer
Digital Works
Los Angeles,
USA
|
Well I did my part.
Got the message to the Reps for it here in California. |
| |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Anatomy Forum Leader
![]() Rebecca Kimmel
Teacher in LALA Land
Los Angeles,
USA
|
Quote:
http://www.sellyourtvconceptnow.com...information.mp3 Bear in mind that this interview was recorded prior to the release of the actual Orphan Works bills to the House and Senate in April of this year; however he's good at explaining the ramifications of why it might be important to oppose the Orphan Works legislation. __________________
Last edited by Rebeccak : 05-08-2008 at 12:45 AM. |
|
| |
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|