can anyone answer this color question?......

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  02 February 2007
can anyone answer this color question?......

hi everyone

i've notice something recently...... there is a difference between taking a color image in photoshop and going to image>mode>greyscale and the image>adjustments>desaturate as you can see from the examples below:

both colors have the same luminance and saturation, just different hue, and then they are blended in the middle....



this is the desaturated:




this is the greyscale:




can somebody explain why there is this difference and which one is a more accurate representation of a 'colorless' image

thanks in advance

rat
 
  02 February 2007
What I always do when I want to transform a colour photo into black and white, is to split the channels. Then you'll get a blue, a green and a red black and white image.

I then choose the one I like the best.

If I think it is not exactly what I want, I'll copy and paste another channel on top of it and set the opacity of that layer to something I like.

You may even want to use bits of all three channels at various parts of your image.

I use progressive selection a lot. If you need some details from one of your channels, do this and copy paste on top and set the opacity to something your like.

When you're almost done, then still play a bit with levels and contrast.

You will end up with something really nice and so much easier to obtain than when we had to do this in the darkroom.

Anyway, never just use the desaturate fonction. It will give you a grey and dull image ....
 
  02 February 2007
Desaturate is the least appealing and least accurate of the two options.
__________________
Practice safe design, always use a concept.
 
  02 February 2007
The way I like to make a good grey scale image, of which there are many, is to put a hue+sat adj layer with the saturation turned all the way down, then between the image layer and the hue+Sat adj layer, put either a channel mixer layer or a selective color adj layer and adjust these values to get a great looking greyscale image. Another fast way to just get the "luminosity" of the image is to take the image into lab mode, and use the lightness channel.

Hope this is useful to someone.

-Jim

P.S. The new CS3 beta has a new method based on this under image>adjustments>black/white.
 
  02 February 2007
conversion vs desaturation

When converting an RGB image to a Grayscale image using the mode menu you are accepting photoshops default recipe, a fixed percentage of each of the three channels blended together, I read a long while ago what these numbers were but it slips me now. B+W conversion plugins, ps's apply, channel mixer and calculations commands put the decision making process back in your hands, but in the end, desaturating an RGB image is the way to zero out the color channels without invoking a voluntary or involuntary conversion recipe.
 
  02 February 2007
A good trick is to do a gradient map layer with the standard black and white gradient selected.

This will typically produce rich results, with nice contrast levels, and evenly distributed values, concordant with the color image.

I never save or convert to grayscale. I find it serves no purpose, and typically if you're going to output the file, most printers prefer the image to be in RGB format (Yes, RGB, not CMYK) and will print accurately as a black and white RGB image than a black and white grayscale image.
__________________
+Matt
 
  02 February 2007
You can convert to black-and-white however you want to. The methods above are all great. Generally, simply desaturating an image isn't a good way of doing it, though that has its purposes.

The Channel Mixer (under Image > Adjustments) is a great way to synthesize the various channels' grayscale information into one coherent monochrome image. I'd recommend that or simple Grayscale conversion. (Naturally, you can switch it back to RGB afterwards. But the conversion to Grayscale does nice things to the values.)

On a side note, you may want to try something to help you achieve purer blends, rattsang. Go to Edit > Color Settings, activate Blend RGB Colors Using Gamma:,and set the value to 1.00. Then try painting the same blend. You should see different colors in the middle, ones that you may find a little more attractive. They're less "muddy."
__________________
Think you've discovered a great new technique for painting in Photoshop? Stop by the CGWiki article and tell the world.
 
  02 February 2007
Originally Posted by Matt: I find it serves no purpose, and typically if you're going to output the file, most printers prefer the image to be in RGB format (Yes, RGB, not CMYK) and will print accurately as a black and white RGB image than a black and white grayscale image.


Hmmm ... maybe for photograghs, but not for commercial offset printing. for commercial offset printing, if you want a greyscale image, make sure it is converted from rgb to greyscale, otherwise, they printer will be forced to convert it and they may not take into consideration the options involved. Many times I will experiment with assigning a colorspace (assign, not convert) and then go to my desired color mode. I have gained alot of detail in color images doing this. I know we are talking b+w here though. Anyway, if you don't make it greyscale, you run the risk of the image being reproduced in cmyk, which will have a color shift in the values. This can be desirable, as long as you control it.

Just more of my 2 cents.
-Jim
 
  02 February 2007
Originally Posted by Datameister: On a side note, you may want to try something to help you achieve purer blends, rattsang. Go to Edit > Color Settings, activate Blend RGB Colors Using Gamma:,and set the value to 1.00. Then try painting the same blend. You should see different colors in the middle, ones that you may find a little more attractive. They're less "muddy."


Yep, good advise, this is true. The same thing happens in lab, though I find it is better in lab. This really is noticeable when you have layers with diffrent blend modes going on. Do try both and see what works for you. lab is a very powerful and little understood colorspace. I have recomended this book here before, so here goes again:

http://www.amazon.com/Photoshop-LAB...e/dp/0321356780

Probably the best book I have ever owned on cololr theory/graphics.

-Jim
 
  02 February 2007
Quote: Yep, good advise, this is true. The same thing happens in lab, though I find it is better in lab. This really is noticeable when you have layers with diffrent blend modes going on. Do try both and see what works for you. lab is a very powerful and little understood colorspace.


Very true. I would simply work directly in LAB, but that disables some of the color correction features and so on. Using the gamma 1.00 feature achieves an effect which is extremely similar if slightly inferior, but without disabling any helpful features.
__________________
Think you've discovered a great new technique for painting in Photoshop? Stop by the CGWiki article and tell the world.
 
  02 February 2007
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.