Mental Ray, DSG Shiny Value, and Artifacts, oh my!

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  05 May 2006
Mental Ray, DGS Shiny Value, and Artifacts, oh my!

Been spending a decent amount of time looking through the various (and somewhat old/lengthy) Mental Ray threads. Came accross one part which spoke of colored dots / artifacts but that's not quite my problem I believe.

First, have a look-see:



After throwing my hands in the air over another scene file which I could not get to look decent, I decided to hit reset and see what I could do with a classic plane/teapot combination scene. It has one MR-Spotlight pointing down.

The materials applied to both the teapot and plane are mental ray materials, with DGS sub-materials applied to both the surface and photon slots (instances of each other).

I suppose my first question should be: Is DSG to be used only in very specific instances? In my real scene, I was trying to light a simple window with shutters and applied a DSG material to it to make it appear like white painted wood. I ended up with the same problem as you see in the picture above (red circled).

Seems as if I take the "Shiny" value of the plane to zero, those go away. The higher the shiny value, the closer and denser the tiny dots become as they give a more mirror-like reflection of the teapot.

From my 1+ hour spent on fiddling with various render settings, it would appear that no combination of values -- ranging from the very low to the very high -- in the render settings dialog for GI and FG will have any impact on the dots, as they are in the exact same location and intensity every time.

Any clue on how to make these go away? Or should I not be using DSG at all?

Thanks for any assistance.
__________________
take note
we start to drift
all points converge

Last edited by Theta-Dot : 05 May 2006 at 01:54 AM.
 
  05 May 2006
I spelled it "DSG" instead of "DGS" in the title
oopsie!
__________________
take note
we start to drift
all points converge
 
  05 May 2006
The problem is with your Glossy Highlights, this is what is causing the white dots. I've replicated your scene here and if I put black in the glossy highlights these white dots disappear. So you should use the glossy highlights only when the you have a high shiny value, in this case you can add some specular to give it some reflection.

But I think DGS should be used in specific situation because it's a physic phenomen and can slow your render, so in animations I usually don't use DGS.
__________________
Back to the university...
 
  05 May 2006
I see. I've been out of town for a few days, but before I left I just started using DGS materials directly (Instead of assigning DSG to slots of a Mental Ray first-tier shader). It fixed things but I guess I don't fundamentally understand the difference between the two.

I guess I also don't get why using a physics related material would ever NOT be desired (at least in single frame renders). Aren't they supposed to be the most physically accurate?

There seems to be a redundancy, or overlapping of sorts in a lot of these shaders. You can achieve a similar look in several different ones. It almost makes choosing one over another completely arbitrary.
__________________
take note
we start to drift
all points converge
 
  05 May 2006
I guess someone like jeff patton could answer better than me, but what I know is that the DGS Material have all the shaders inside like surface, shadow, photons, etc... when you use the DGS as a surface shader in a MentalRay material, you have more control over the other shaders.

And we always want to use physical accurated materials in our render, but sometimes we can fake it with a differente material, like a raytrace material, getting much faster render times. Of course that if you have a fast computer or render farm you don't bother with render time, but in small companies and with short deadlines we have to avoid long render times.

And I agree with you, we have many differents ways to get to the same result.
__________________
Back to the university...
 
  05 May 2006
dgs materials work in a very particular way. they replicate in a physically accurate way real-world materials. it is called DGS responding to a Diffuse color or map, a Glossy color or map, and a Specular color or map.

Diffuse. This is the main "color" of the material. A wooden table, for example, would have a wooden texture map applied here.

Glossy. This parameter determines how blurred the reflections on your object will be. When you click the color, the Value parameter can range from 0-1. 0 means the object will b 0 percent glossy. that is, it won't have glossy reflections, (it won't have 'blurry' reflections). a value of 1 will mean 100% glossy reflections, that is, very blurred. Glossy reflections take much longer to render than straightforward reflections and will need much more samples for them to look any good. those white points in your render are caused by the fact that you have glossy reflections in your material and not enough samples to make them look smooth, at least not as smooth as you'd like them to.

Specular. this parameter determines the specularity of the material, that is, the straightforward, raytraced reflections in your object. as in the glossy parameter, 0 means no reflections at all, and 1 means 100% reflective. speculars don't take as long to render as glossiness, but it will still take longer to render than a 0% specular, 0% glossy material. It will take as long to render as an ordinary raytraced material.

For instance, let's say you want a chrome material. then, you would set D to black, G to black (V:0) and S to 1, so it would be 100% reflective.

An important thing is that the values of G and S, added, SHOULD NOT exceed 1, or you might get unexpected and unrealistic results.

good luck
 
  05 May 2006
Oops. I thought glossy, specular, AND diffuse had to add up to 1...
Knowing that it's only glossy and specular is helpful. Thanks.
__________________
take note
we start to drift
all points converge
 
  05 May 2006
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Theta-Dot: Oops. I thought glossy, specular, AND diffuse had to add up to 1...
Knowing that it's only glossy and specular is helpful. Thanks.

I thought that too.

Thanks Rodrigo for the explanation.
__________________
Back to the university...
 
  05 May 2006
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.