Aproblem in making the fr2 spotlight looks real!!

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01 January 2006   #1
Aproblem in making the fr2 spotlight looks real!!

hi for all members im facing a broblem in making the spot light looks real

im the green image
you can see whats the different!!

can any body help me by making a box that have a light looks like the first picture and post it here
or putting the tut.

i tried to do the fr2 from the manual but i didnt understand any thing

thanQ
 
Old 01 January 2006   #2
I don't know how the artist did it, but one option is to cover the light fixture with a plane mapped with a circular gradient in the alpha channel.

I used this gradient for the attached render:
 
Old 01 January 2006   #3
Hi - dont know much about it, but the other visuals I have seen that exhibit this effect have used IES light info.

Cheers

Steve
__________________
www.3dvisuals.net
 
Old 01 January 2006   #4
Originally Posted by SteveB: Hi - dont know much about it, but the other visuals I have seen that exhibit this effect have used IES light info.

Cheers

Steve

Yep, but fR-2 doesn't support IES lights ... yet.
 
Old 01 January 2006   #5
this rendering was done with fr max version as far as i remember. it was also used in advertisment for fr stage1 for max. at least a very similar one.

but edwin said we will get ies lights soon. the fr core supports it for long time.

cheers
stefan
 
Old 01 January 2006   #6
I haven't tried this but can't you just project a map from the light? I don't know if cinema can do this. I'm a max user btw.
 
Old 01 January 2006   #7
Thanks for that tip adam
__________________

 
Old 01 January 2006   #8
Ok, here's a scene with a map projected through a light just to show you what it looks like. Looks Pretty good and it's simple too! Didn't use fr for this one but I am a fr user for max. No Gi. Just regular lights.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lights.jpg (16.7 KB, 273 views)
 
Old 01 January 2006   #9
can someone maybe post a file with the gradient thing on a plane idea? i tried it and cannot get it to work.

you place the gradient in the alpha channel of a otherwise blank material? map it onto a plane in front of the spotlight?

thanks
 
Old 01 January 2006   #10
Originally Posted by sketchbook: you place the gradient in the alpha channel of a otherwise blank material? map it onto a plane in front of the spotlight?


Yes. I keep a spotlight around to use anytime that I alreadt set up with a plane in front of it, and a mat on that with a bitmap of the light 'shape' in the transparency channel (no others on). Remember--you can control light/dark AND color this way.

However, the C4D lights are not realistic enough even with this trick employed, since they do not shine properly on closeby objects. IES files should fix this, so we wait.

Read this thread from a year ago for more:
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=208513
__________________
Ernest Burden III
Acme Digital

Last edited by Ernest Burden : 01 January 2006 at 04:32 PM.
 
Old 01 January 2006   #11
how do you mean they dont' shine properly on close by objects?

make sure you use inverse square falloff for correct light falloff by the way (otherwise it's clamped close by and attenuates incorrectly).

coincidentally i posted my little script for locking a texture tags settings in spherical projection to a spotlights outer angle value here (scroll down) : http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthr...854#post3143854

which can save you a little time when setting up spotlights with gobos.
__________________
The Third Party | Homepage | My Reel
"You need to know what you're doing before you start, and to start because you need what you're doing."

Last edited by mdme_sadie : 01 January 2006 at 06:07 AM.
 
Old 01 January 2006   #12
Originally Posted by mdme_sadie: how do you mean they dont' shine properly on close by objects?

make sure you use inverse square falloff for correct light falloff by the way (otherwise it's clamped close by and attenuates incorrectly).


It being a year ago I don't remember which falloff I used, and it would have been before the newer falloffs were added, also, wouldn't it? I should re-visit the test file to be sure.
__________________
Ernest Burden III
Acme Digital
 
Old 01 January 2006   #13
Originally Posted by Ernest Burden: It being a year ago I don't remember which falloff I used, and it would have been before the newer falloffs were added, also, wouldn't it? I should re-visit the test file to be sure.

Yes, the new falloffs are much better in this respect.
 
Old 01 January 2006   #14
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.