CGTalk > Main > General Discussion
Login register
View Poll Results: Is it real or Photoshop trickery?
100% Real Photo 16 38.10%
Photoshop'ed marvel 16 38.10%
Superpowers ... obviously 8 19.05%
Undecided 2 4.76%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-30-2005, 09:46 PM   #1
Lord of the posts
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 610
Question Real or Photoshop?

This is a picture of one of my classmates from when I went to school and it spurred a never ending debate whether or not it was real or photoshopped. I decided to bring it to CGtalk to decide.

/can a mod make this a poll? I checked the FAQ and I just don't see the option to create a poll.
Old 11-30-2005, 09:48 PM   #2
marzipan...its great!!
mushroomgod's Avatar
Matthew Dartford
illustrator and lazy git
MDI Digital
Norwich, United Kingdom
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,926
Send a message via MSN to mushroomgod

i say real.
Monsters! Monsters from the id!


MDI Digital
Old 11-30-2005, 09:50 PM   #3
MisfitAnimator's Avatar
John Bucholtz
Motion Edit Lead
Dr. D Studios
Sydney, Australia
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 215
Send a message via AIM to MisfitAnimator
I think it's Photoshop
"Klaatu barada nikto"
Adventures of John and Kitty
Old 11-30-2005, 09:55 PM   #4
Adobe Wan Kenobi
Wintermute's Avatar
Joe Richards
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 732

Motion blur on the jersey and hair.
Pretty damn good photo!
"…What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon!?"
"Every day is an opportunity disguised as a challenge" - Tiki Barber
Old 11-30-2005, 09:57 PM   #5
Lord of the posts
nitindesign's Avatar
Nitin Khosa
Freelance designer
nitin design
Zurich, Switzerland
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 636

Photoshoped as he does not look fit enough to pull that off

Edit- Then again he could be cut like Bruce Lee under that top!

Old 11-30-2005, 09:59 PM   #6
marzipan...its great!!
mushroomgod's Avatar
Matthew Dartford
illustrator and lazy git
MDI Digital
Norwich, United Kingdom
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,926
Send a message via MSN to mushroomgod

Originally Posted by [nitin design]
Photoshoped as he does not look fit enough to pull that off

perhaps he was once bitten by a radioactive spider
Monsters! Monsters from the id!


MDI Digital
Old 11-30-2005, 10:01 PM   #7
Chris Bacon
Frame by Frame
Chris Bacon's Avatar
Chris Bacon
Double Negative VFX
London, United Kingdom
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,711
Im gona say real...its too good for photoshop....
Animator at Double Negative VFX London..
Old 11-30-2005, 10:04 PM   #8
First Prime of Anistropic
JDex's Avatar
Jason Dexter
Lighting/Rendering/Pipeline TD
Providence, USA
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,594
Real... Cool shot
(Sans Gerfuffle)

On a VFX Hiatus
Old 11-30-2005, 10:07 PM   #9
Better than staples.
paperclip's Avatar
Theresa Ryan
Freelance illustrator
Theresa Ryan Visual Development
Castlebar, Ireland
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,807
I'm saying Photoshop. His pose just isn't believable- his center of gravity is way off. For him to do this, he would literally have to defy gravity.
Old 11-30-2005, 10:11 PM   #10
Put the Doo in Doofuss !
slaughters's Avatar
Stan Slaughter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,505
Easily doable with a fast enough camera.

Easily doable with only medium level photoshop abilities and attention to the proper lighting.
Stan Slaughter
We have enough youth, how about a Fountain of Smart?

Old 11-30-2005, 10:15 PM   #11
digital boy
Rudeone's Avatar
Rudy-Jan Faber
concept artist/illustrator
Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,073
Send a message via MSN to Rudeone
I think it's real, IMO the pose would be too awkward to take when you're on the ground, there would be a lot of weight on your arm and his rightleg seems to be not placed normally when you would take on a sort of crawlingpose just to manipulate a photo, it would be to uncomfortable.
However I am wondering how he would pull of a jump like that and I do see a dark edge on the rightside of his head wich could mean a cut-out.
Old 11-30-2005, 10:19 PM   #12
Best Member Ever
Windmill's Avatar
Christian So
Character Animator
Sydney, Australia
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 494
I'm pretty 95% sure it's real, If it isn't you are a photoshop god.
(relatively) Current WIPs...
Mountaineer WIP
Daily Sketches
Old 11-30-2005, 10:20 PM   #13
Polygonal Assassin
NeptuneImaging's Avatar
Kashif Riley
Boston, USA
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,101
I think Photoshopped. Because if I did that, I would be one big motion blur on the camera lens. Then again, there are some cameras that get things in perfect clear frames.
Old 11-30-2005, 10:24 PM   #14
Interesting User Title
thatoneguy's Avatar
Gavin Greenwalt
Exec. VP of Pixel Mergers and Acquisitions
Straightface Studios
Seattle, USA
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,337
From a CG standpoint, I can't find any evidence of tampering.

However from a photo standpoint, a couple of things stand out to me as warning flags. Honestly I would give it a 60/40 which means it very well could be real and I'm just paranoid.

It would appear gravity for the guy on the wall is to the left not down. Note: Hair, pants and shirt all "fall" to the left, not down, especially if they wanted to "stay" down on the ground as he jumped.

In order to get a photo with that little motion blur, you would need to be shooting at incredibly high shutter speed. At that fast of a shutter, I don't believe the photo would be that blown out.

Eyeline on the guy in the background seems to be looking at something higher than the action taking place.

I can't find anything that I can stake my life on, but I would say photoshoped.
Old 11-30-2005, 10:34 PM   #15
El Mono del Mar
Andyman's Avatar
Andrew Turner
Amber Electric
Elmer, NJ, USA
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 802
Send a message via AIM to Andyman
I'm gonna say real...

...but I don't understand why there is no shadow from those two long lights hanging right above his head.

The picture is somewhat noisy (esp look at the ducts), which means it was probably shot at a high ISO. If you get a lens with a low enough aperature (like <3) and take the photo at a high ISO (=>1600), then I don't think you would have to set your shutter speed too high.

There is also no EXIF data. That doesn't mean anything for sure, but worth noting.

Last edited by Andyman : 11-30-2005 at 10:45 PM.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.