CGTalk > Software Specific Forums > NewTek Lightwave 3D
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-13-2005, 12:41 PM   #1
SockMonkey
Not Really Here
Mike
Student
USA
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 58
"Atlas" isn't so bad...

"Atlas" UV mapping royally sucks for painting textures in any 2D paint package, but I'm having decent results with it in Deep Paint 3D in Projection mode. Not all the time, but some of the time.
I often see Atlas terribly maligned, but hey I kind of like poor ol' Atlas when he's cooperating with me.
__________________
Who says you can't do that?
 
Old 11-13-2005, 12:59 PM   #2
softdistortion
Collaborationist
 
softdistortion's Avatar
portfolio
______________ softdistortion.com collabunlimited.com
______________ CURRENTLY IN
Canada
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,580
Send a message via ICQ to softdistortion Send a message via MSN to softdistortion
hehe...would be nice if it worked like that in other apps...usually get a huge mess of little pieces all over the UV.
__________________
 
Old 11-13-2005, 03:41 PM   #3
Eclyps19
The Snake Wrangler
 
Eclyps19's Avatar
portfolio
Alec Sanger
Freelance CG Artist
Lawrence Technological University
Clarkston, USA
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 348
Send a message via AIM to Eclyps19 Send a message via MSN to Eclyps19
i'm finally starting to try to UV a character. What kind of unwrapping do you usually use?
 
Old 11-13-2005, 06:00 PM   #4
SockMonkey
Not Really Here
Mike
Student
USA
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 58
The question, "What kind of mapping to use" has been plaguing mankind mankind for eternity. or at least for the last 15 years or so.
It all depends, really. Something more cylindrical in shape, would be best served with a cylindrical UV map, and so on.
A plane, like, say, a floor, cna be done easily with planar mapping.
And, Atlas is actually pretty good for "boxy" things, but sucks for organic shapes, unless, as I mentioned above, you're painting in 3D on a projection, but even then it's not a sure thing.

There are two ways I go about it. Either find the best mapping for the material in question and then edit the UV map to death with modeler's tools, or make many UV maps for various surfaces, and deal with them all separately.

There's also an "unwrap" plugin you can get somehere. I don't know where, though; I got it included with Dan Ablan's Inside LightWave 7 book, but don't use it. I don't even know if it works with LW 8.

But, what it does is take a cylindrical projection and flatten it into a planar projection...pretty much in one step what you'd have to do manually. Sounds good, but unless I missed something, it doesn't work right unless your surface/part is completely centered on all axes (F2 key), which seems kind of impractical.

Leigh van der Byle's book, LightWave 3D 8 Texturing covers a lot on the subject of UV mapping.
__________________
Who says you can't do that?
 
Old 11-13-2005, 06:00 PM   #5
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,481
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.