Maxwell Render 1.0 Pre-Release Update 11-6-05

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11 November 2005   #1
Maxwell Render 1.0 Pre-Release Update 11-6-05

Quoted from Maxwell Render Forum

ref:http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/...8079&highlight=

Quote: victor
Site Admin

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:36 am
Post subject: Maxwell 1.0 test (update-3)

These are simple tests to show the improvements in noise removal with Maxwell 1.0. With the beta, it would have required many hours to clean completely. Notice that the computer used was not especially fast.








Noise removal is not an improvement on some specific calculations, like dielectrics. It's one new main feature of the engine.



tom
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:06 am
Post subject: Unbiased reflected caustics of light on the mirrors through 2 x 20 mm thick modeled glass bricks.

__________________
digitecture.org
Design|Energy|Computation


 
Old 11 November 2005   #2
looks to be some fair improvement in the render engine - but being c4d related - how's the plugin coming?

plugin for c4d was pretty so-so from last time i researched and heard much about it. i guess it really wouldn't matter if the render engine was perfect if (c4d related) the plugin was crap for c4d. sort of how the realflow plugin is compared to their better versions for maya and max - cause we can then show lots of great pictures from mental ray and vray here that really don't matter a smidge since it isn't a result of working with c4d.

of course i could always use my maya to render out to maxwell, but then i'm posting in the wrong forum if that was the case.

any updates on the plugins you've heard about? i have hopes for it but just don't feel all that generous enough to pre-order still - especially after how the past year of maxwell and c4d results have been.

dann
__________________
-
Dann Stubbs - dann@darkskydigital.com
http://www.RenderKing.com Value Priced C4D, VRAY, Cycles4D Render Farm
-
 
Old 11 November 2005   #3
This is impressive!
 
Old 11 November 2005   #4
The current plugin is useful as such this is very related to C4D. There are some features that are not fully operative but then the plugin that is available is more than 3 months old. Still in its current state it is capable.

I can produce images with the C4D plugin that the Max and Maya versions can produce, there are some problems but there are creative ways to get around the current limitations that for the kind of quality you can achieve is not bad for the pre-order price. There are plenty of results that allow you get a good idea of what the engine is capable currently. Next Limit is still being somewhat quiet about any other newsbreaking features that have not been announced in the pre-release.

I would say this is good evidence of their intentions to get this engine capable, superior, fast for the 1.0 release. There are more surprises to be announced.

Next Limit has always released new plugins with new releases of the render engine as from what I have heard this new engine is very different from the current beta.

I suspect the plugin to be successful with the new release.
__________________
digitecture.org
Design|Energy|Computation



Last edited by Continuumx : 11 November 2005 at 09:49 PM.
 
Old 11 November 2005   #5
Originally Posted by Gentle: This is impressive!


I would defintely say so, the computer they used for this test is not a speed demon. Imagine the speed of a very current dual or quad processing machine!
__________________
digitecture.org
Design|Energy|Computation


 
Old 11 November 2005   #6
well finally i could get out good, i just hope there will be a equal way for c4d users to use maxwellrender. at the moment this isnt the case.

as far as i understood it, some people mentioned there will be only a simpel export module, and you are supposed to do all in maxwell standalone.( so the terrible c4d plug is obsolete).

lets see what will come. i personally prefer a tight integration like fr promise to do( will they finally deliver?). but i can imagine the will be standalones for vray, brazil etc in future too, and not all of them might be integrated as well. so i guess maybe we have to get used to "standalone renderengines, with only export formats, hmmm...

defenitly waitiing for both MW and FR2. i think both will enrich my arsenal of rendertools enormous:-)

cheers
stefan
 
Old 11 November 2005   #7
Originally Posted by lllab: i personally prefer a tight integration like fr promise to do( will they finally deliver?)...


That's funny! We are waiting for:

Final Delivery Stage2
Farewell Render

edit: humm, maybe we can do better with:
Maywell Render



waiting, waiting, waiting
__________________
Ernest Burden III
Acme Digital

Last edited by Ernest Burden : 11 November 2005 at 12:43 PM.
 
Old 11 November 2005   #8
Yes!!
Looks good.
I hope for a tight c4d integration, testrenders etc!!! !
To export only is a pitty, then again maybe som 3rd party developer takes care of it for a couple of bucks. (hey it´s external)

How come c4d almost allways have trouble with major external stuff?
I used to use EIAS, and there too it was alot of trouble, maybe it is bad karma?
 
Old 11 November 2005   #9
These results look beautiful, but those render times & small format size, would have me worried if planned to use on anything for production...
__________________
R11.5 Studio| Mudbox 2010| AEPro CS5| 3DCoat Pro
Dual Quad Xeon 2.5GHz / Windows 7 x64 / 12GB RAM
 
Old 11 November 2005   #10
Larger update!

ref: http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8079

Quote:
480 min @ 1024 x 768 @ P4 2.8HT




460 min @ 800 x 600 @ P4 2.6HT



__________________
digitecture.org
Design|Energy|Computation



Last edited by Continuumx : 11 November 2005 at 06:15 AM.
 
Old 11 November 2005   #11
ref: http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8142

Quote: In the following tests you can see how Maxwell 1.0 captures the light in a much more efficient way compared to old beta.




__________________
digitecture.org
Design|Energy|Computation


 
Old 11 November 2005   #12
I just handed in two evening views, could have used that technique...were it available to me.

The car headlights thing looks good, but using spots in AR2.5 looked better. I suppose we can make a sort-of spot with Maxwell by putting an emmitter in a tube to focus light... I converted streets to 'area lights' by object for that general glow. It worked, but I would rather use this Maxwell method.
__________________
Ernest Burden III
Acme Digital
 
Old 11 November 2005   #13
yes that looks very interesting. i am getting exited about mw again, good i bought it:-)

i just hope it will be more usable for c4d users.

cheers
stefan
 
Old 11 November 2005   #14
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.