CGTalk > Work in Progress and Critique > WIP/Critique: 3D
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-22-2002, 07:39 PM   #1
MosaFacku
.
.
animator
seattle, USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 402
Binding methods for demo reel

here I am, rigid binding one of my characters, and a question hits me, what would employers rather see on a demo reel, smooth or rigid binding?? i know that most game engines right now use rigid binding, but newer games, like asheron's call 2 uses smooth binding. should i show my ability to do both, or would it be better to just smooth bind? what do you guys think? does it even really matter as long as the deformations are good?
 
Old 06-23-2002, 06:55 PM   #2
Ivars
Lord of the stuff
 
Ivars's Avatar
Ivar Dahlberg
Lead Artist
Tension Graphics
Falun, Sweden
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 532
Send a message via ICQ to Ivars
Working with renderware for exmaple, you would use smoothbind.
 
Old 01-13-2006, 10:00 AM   #3
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,481
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.