CGTalk > Technical > Technical and Hardware
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-22-2013, 12:27 PM   #1
Dansolo
Expert
portfolio
Daniel Baddeley
Stoke On Trent, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 211
second rendering workstation

I'm currently looking into / researching getting a second machine purely for rendering and got three ideas in mind but need some thoughts on which is best in terms of rendering speed:

1) HP Z600 workstation - Dual Xeon X5660 /16GB RAM

2) Workstation specialist - RS-D2850 - Dual Xeon E5 - 2640 / 16GB RAM

3) Home build I7 3930k (overclocked)/ 16GB RAM

I'll mostly be rendering with Maya and V Ray

Any thoughts would help clear my mind ?

Thanks
 
Old 06-22-2013, 07:08 PM   #2
sentry66
Expert
 
sentry66's Avatar
portfolio
node crazy
USA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,102
price might be a big factor as will how your renders are set up with threading.

the two xeon systems will perform similarly. They both have 12 cores. One has newer xeons, but slower clock speeds.
 
Old 06-23-2013, 04:47 PM   #3
Telemachus
Expert
 
Telemachus's Avatar
portfolio
Mo Ali
n/a
Birmingham, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 529
The dual Xeon E5-2640 system will easily be the fastest. The Z600 is using older Xeon processors that are nearly three years old and wouldn't compete with current generation processors very well. Even if overclocked, with the 3930K you'd probably be getting just a little more than two thirds of the performance of the Xeon E5 system and that would be lacking the ECC memory which you might want if you're going to be rendering something for days. On the other hand it would be way cheaper too.
 
Old 06-23-2013, 05:30 PM   #4
sentry66
Expert
 
sentry66's Avatar
portfolio
node crazy
USA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,102
you could probably buy 3 or 4 of the 3930k systems for the same money


This website is somewhat interesting for comparing CPU's. At the very least they lay out all the features:
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Xeon-...el-Xeon-E5-2640

Last edited by sentry66 : 06-23-2013 at 05:54 PM.
 
Old 06-24-2013, 11:06 AM   #5
Dansolo
Expert
portfolio
Daniel Baddeley
Stoke On Trent, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 211
Hi guys,

Appreciate the advice.

I'm guessing the dual E5-2640 would be around 3000+ ( a bit out of my budget).

I've seen an HP Z600 for 1800

Ideally I was hoping for just a single machine as I don't have the room for 3 or 4 towers

Looking at that website and CPUbenchmark.net the dual CPU Z600 is only marginally better than the 3930k.

Which kind of confused me a little as I assumed using a dual system with 12 cores would be a lot quicker than a single CPU with 6 cores at rendering (even though the 3930k is newer tech).
 
Old 06-24-2013, 11:35 AM   #6
sentry66
Expert
 
sentry66's Avatar
portfolio
node crazy
USA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,102
it'll depend on the test/benchmark being used. Those particular scores don't tell the whole story for every scenario, just general use for common computer tasks.

In a perfectly multithreaded world, the dual xeons in either case would be quite a lot faster. Not everything utilizes all cores perfectly though.

However for rendering, in general the dual xeons would be faster than the 3930k by a considerable margin - around 30% faster for the x5660's

though the 3930k would be about 30% faster at single-core functions which is what are used the majority of the time

Last edited by sentry66 : 06-24-2013 at 11:43 AM.
 
Old 06-24-2013, 08:03 PM   #7
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dansolo
Ideally I was hoping for just a single machine as I don't have the room for 3 or 4 towers


If you have room for a full tower dual socket workstation you have room for a few single socket render machines. Some example hardware is below.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16813157283
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16811112300

Assuming the software licenses are cheap or included the best bang for the buck will be with more machines using lower end hardware versus a single machine with higher end hardware.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 06-24-2013, 08:03 PM   #8
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,480
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.