256x256 normal map works better then 2k?

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  02 February 2013
256x256 normal map works better then 2k?

Hello everyone, I will post images tomorrow but in the mean time I am hoping someone can shed some light on this. I am using Maya2012 with Zbrush & Xnormal for map generation.

So I sculpted a human body and generated a normal map for the low res. I must have made a mistake in the settings but I made a 256x256 normal map in .tga. The results were pretty good, detail and muscle definition all worked out. Hardly any visible seams between the UV shells.

Interesting enough, when making a 2k version thinking that it should be even better. I get the worst results i've ever seen and the seams between the UV shells are very obvious.

Is there a logical reason behind this or did I click something wrong here?

I've tried selecting all edges around the shells and making those hard edges. Everything else is a soft edge. Any ideas? Thanks.
  03 March 2013
Images would help understand.
  03 March 2013
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.