|02 February 2013||#16|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Originally Posted by NolanSW: I think this tip might help your issue. Pretty simple and cleaver.
yup that's what I suggested back in post #5
blah blah blah
|02 February 2013||#17|
Join Date: Aug 2002
I cannont agree more with Gmask, we use this BULLETPROOF technique extensively, as we very often start facial shapes/rigging before texturing starts.
If you have time, I'd strongly suggest you make a script that allows to make it instant, and nobrainer, and updating uvs on a deformed mesh will become a routine task.
Idea is simple, let's say you want to transfer uvs from meshSRC(good uvs) to meshDST(bad uvs, eventually with any deformer down the stream)
You need to inspect if "meshDSTshape.inMesh" attribute receives an incoming connection, and if yes, parse all it's siblings intermediate shapes, and polyTransfer uvs only on those whose inMesh is free. For the cost of time polyTransfer execution, you can proceed without searching if any of those intermediate objects are really usefull or not. But of course you could make the check for the really usefull ones.
Bonus is that with this approach, you can even update base shape of your model (with a vertex transfer), if any retake happened after you started modeling, provided the topology didn't change.
Extra bonus is that you can make your script smart enough to figure the kind of shape it's
processing, because the same principles apply to nurbsSurface/Curves...
You can even reuse some code to make a script that cleans useless intermediate shapes under a transform, as they can cause you scene size to grow fast...
|03 March 2013||#19|
Join Date: Dec 2012
been some time..
Originally Posted by zaskar: You could make a copy of your mesh, fix the uvs there and set the original mesh as blendshape target, then template the original mesh.
doing this - is no different then using the deformer, and yup - it'll work.
the other posts in this thread have tried to find a way to not have that extra model and extra deformer, although there were nice suggestions and smart ones - in my rig, still the only one that works is still the deformer (unfortunately), because there is a wide chain of complicated stuff, having all blend-shapes, deformers, clusters and even curves&geomatry effecting the rig - no other solution has worked.
P.S. I have tried ALL the suggestions, and I appreciate a lot the time you all put into this..
|03 March 2013||#20|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Thread automatically closed
This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
|Thread Closed share thread|