CGTalk > Software > Autodesk Maya > Maya Rendering
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-02-2013, 04:01 AM   #1
Muzan
New Member
portfolio
Gary Francis
Looking for 3d modeling work
Concord, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
fine details not rendering correctly

I have a coil of small tightly wrapped wire and I have no idea how get maya (2013) to render it out nicely in mental ray. I don't even know what to call this problem to google search a solution. I attempted anti aliasing, but the render times get much longer and not actually solved, just a little better than before.

what I am trying to render:


What it renders out as:


anyone know of a tutorial I can look at to find the solution to this?
__________________
www.gfrancis3d.com
 
Old 03-02-2013, 07:13 AM   #2
refract
Expert
 
refract's Avatar
portfolio
John John
Character modeling, Lighting, Compositing
Work
Los Angeles, United States
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to refract Send a message via AIM to refract Send a message via MSN to refract Send a message via Yahoo to refract
Set it to Production render at 1920*1280 and use Lanzcos?
 
Old 03-02-2013, 10:47 AM   #3
InfernalDarkness
Madness. Madness, I say!
 
InfernalDarkness's Avatar
portfolio
Sho Pi
CG arch/viz
Seattle, USA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,586
What you're seeing are called "Moire'" patterns. At the resolution you're rendering, you won't possibly be able to approach the level of detail in your larger example. But this is a filtering issue, so you should be able to get a lot closer anyway.

Try rendering it with Triangle, Gaussian, Mitchell, then Lanzcos? Alternatively, you can leave your antialiasing low in the main Render Settings and just use the shape-node override for that object to have it antialias more, thus saving a little rendertime.
__________________
Commodore 64 @ 1MHz
64KB RAM
1541 Floppy Drive


"Like stone we battle the wind... Beat down and strangle the rains..."
 
Old 03-02-2013, 05:16 PM   #4
Muzan
New Member
portfolio
Gary Francis
Looking for 3d modeling work
Concord, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
thanks for the replies

The following renders were done in 1080p and with the camera at the distance the render will be taken from, cropped and not re-sized. These were the results:

Box


Triangle


Mitchell


lanzcos


Lanzcos with anti aliasing at 4


Lanzcos with aa at 5 and shading at 32 - 20 samples


lanzcos looks the best, until I put an aa on it beyond the default production setting but still has that moire pattern issue. My internet searches come up with very little information on moire patterns when it comes to objects.
__________________
www.gfrancis3d.com
 
Old 03-02-2013, 08:51 PM   #5
DutchDimension
Think different
 
DutchDimension's Avatar
portfolio
Dutch Dimension
DMP/Environment Artist
MPC
United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,171
You’re probably better off to create that sort of tiny detail with a bump/normal map and use elliptical filtering on the texture. You’ll end up with a lighter scene file and no need for crazy AA settings or Laczos/Mitchell filtering, which can introduce other artifacts as a trade-off to their perceived sharpness. I wouldn’t be surprised if the moire was less offensive too.
__________________
"Even the Christmas vacation will be darkened by New Zealand scripts…"
~ J.R.R. Tolkien, The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, Letter 34
 
Old 03-02-2013, 10:35 PM   #6
tswalk
Expert
 
tswalk's Avatar
portfolio
Troy Walker
USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 712
you could try unified sampling... Brenton Rayner has a good write-up about it here:

http://elementalray.wordpress.com/2...ified-sampling/

then you don't have to worry about the filter methods.
__________________
-- LinkedIn Profile --
-- Blog --
-- Portfolio --
 
Old 03-07-2013, 01:04 AM   #7
Bitter
Also Highly Corrosive
 
Bitter's Avatar
David Fer Real
Fixer of things
USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,721
tswalk is correct, use Unified Sampling and raytracing.

And stick to gaussian 2.0 2.0
__________________
My opinions are always my own...and maybe a friend's, but never my employer's.
 
Old 03-09-2013, 10:41 PM   #8
Muzan
New Member
portfolio
Gary Francis
Looking for 3d modeling work
Concord, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
I finally got around to trying out unified sampling. It removed all the terrible noise, but it didn't bring in detail. (maybe I did it wrong?)


^cropped from 1080p^

I am going to try a normal map instead when I got time and see how it goes.
__________________
www.gfrancis3d.com
 
Old 03-10-2013, 12:06 PM   #9
Undseth
Lord of the posts
 
Undseth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 634
OP seem to make use of ambient occlusion, perhaps his issue stems from incorrect settings for the ambient occlusion effect?
__________________
Are you warm, are you real, Mona Lisa?
 
Old 03-10-2013, 01:37 PM   #10
Panupat
Expert
 
Panupat's Avatar
portfolio
Panupat Chong
Thailand
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,942
I don't think you'll get much detail at that resolution. You simply don't have enough pixel for it. I'd increase the filter size even more and use something like Gause to prevent flickering if it moves around.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:46 PM   #11
Muzan
New Member
portfolio
Gary Francis
Looking for 3d modeling work
Concord, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panupat
I don't think you'll get much detail at that resolution. You simply don't have enough pixel for it.


it should be enough... I mean the loose wires that are on the shafts show up, why not the coils? They are no thinner or thicker, just spun much, much tighter.
__________________
www.gfrancis3d.com
 
Old 03-10-2013, 05:44 PM   #12
Panupat
Expert
 
Panupat's Avatar
portfolio
Panupat Chong
Thailand
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,942
Those loose wire are visible because their shapes are being defined by occlusion/drop shadow which spans more than 1 pixel. Those fine details on the other hand, each lines are only a fraction of a pixel. Trying to get sharp details on those will only create moire effects.

Imagine you draw a bunch of lines with 1 pixel width in photoshop. Then, scale them all down.

What you should aim for with anti aliasing filter in this sort of details, is to reduce moire and prevent flickering.
 
Old 03-10-2013, 08:30 PM   #13
VB2341
Frequenter
portfolio
Varun Bajaj
Troy, US
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 125
To test what Pan said, use your current render settings, but zoom in close to the objects giving you the moire patterns. If there is a large change (shadow to illumination for instance) over the distance of 1 pixel or less, you're going to get poor results. Antialiasing may get it to work at the desired size, but at the same time it may reduce the detail you can see quite a bit. Notice the example images used in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliasing are at quite different sizes, it should be more enlightening. It's possible that using bump or normal maps would help, but the problem of cramming too much detail into a single pixel would still exist I think.
 
Old 05-24-2013, 07:53 PM   #14
Muzan
New Member
portfolio
Gary Francis
Looking for 3d modeling work
Concord, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
weeell, I finally got around to taking care of the problem after all the things I've tried and procrastinating on it while doing other projects. Making the wires larger, though I was against the idea because I liked them smaller, was the optimal solution to get rid of the pattern.

here is a final render of it.
__________________
www.gfrancis3d.com

Last edited by Muzan : 05-24-2013 at 07:58 PM.
 
Old 05-24-2013, 07:53 PM   #15
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,481
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.