[Critique wanted]Ranger meets giant

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  05 May 2013
[Critique wanted]Ranger meets giant

So this is my latest piece, I would like to hear from you guys what you feel could be improved.



Thanks!
 
  05 May 2013
Kudos for taking on broader, bolder brush strokes. Good job! Now go do ten more just like this one!

The giant's chest and upraised arm anatomy strike me as needing some tinkering. His head feels a tad too small as well.
__________________
JoshHass.com

Last edited by ZombieMariachis : 05 May 2013 at 02:53 PM.
 
  05 May 2013
Originally Posted by ZombieMariachis: Kudos for taking on broader, bolder brush strokes. Good job! Now go do ten more just like this one!


Thank you! I was shamelessly trying to copy the style of one of Jamie Jones paintings.

Originally Posted by ZombieMariachis: The giant's chest and upraised arm anatomy strike me as needing some tinkering. His head feels a tad too small as well.


Yes, I agree. The anatomy needs some love. I dislike the giant as a whole to be honest.
 
  05 May 2013
Yeah, I spotted the Jaime Jones look immediately. He's one of my favorites (along with Craig Mullins and a few others).

For an action scene, the body language is a bit vague, as is the readability. What is the giant doing? Where is his left arm? What is he swinging? A club/staff? And that large round black mass--is that a shield? If so, it needs more definition so it's not just a solid black mass. You also need to make the arm holding the shield more obvious, since the forearm is barely visible right now. Value management is very important in readability as well as the overall visual design of your composition.

The anatomy/figure has many problems (The ranger's tiny head, giant arms and hands, lack of structural information in the anatomy in both figures, etc), and this is a symptom of trying to run and jump when you haven't learned to crawl and walk yet. Slow down and study anatomy/figure so that you aren't just mimicking another artist's surface treatment by emulating his brushwork, while all the underlying structure of your image's various elements are totally wrong. No amount of surface treatment will save a painting is all the foundation elements are problematic. It's just like how no amount of special effects will save a really bad screenplay with bad acting and bad direction.

Artists like Jaime Jones are compelling not just because of their brushwork, but because they have very strong foundations as artists. They have mastered all the critical foundations like composition, perspective, lighting/values, color theory, anatomy/figure, etc. If they didn't have those foundations, their brushwork would be meaningless.
 
  05 May 2013
Yeah, I love his work as well. I'll be sure to check out Craig Mullins as well!

Originally Posted by Lunatique: Yeah, I spotted the Jaime Jones look immediately. He's one of my favorites (along with Craig Mullins and a few others).


Thank you for this. You are very correct. I was workings ahead of my skill level. My main goal was to try get a real composition going. I was also trying to think of the values and anatomy when doing this piece. But I was to focused on rendering it nicely that I drifted away and started neglecting the main ingredients. An easy misstake a lot of beginners do I figure...

I was trying to do something grand with lacking fundamentals. I should do more studies and less renders.

Originally Posted by Lunatique: For an action scene, the body language is a bit vague, as is the readability. What is the giant doing? Where is his left arm? What is he swinging? A club/staff? And that large round black mass--is that a shield? If so, it needs more definition so it's not just a solid black mass. You also need to make the arm holding the shield more obvious, since the forearm is barely visible right now. Value management is very important in readability as well as the overall visual design of your composition.

The anatomy/figure has many problems (The ranger's tiny head, giant arms and hands, lack of structural information in the anatomy in both figures, etc), and this is a symptom of trying to run and jump when you haven't learned to crawl and walk yet. Slow down and study anatomy/figure so that you aren't just mimicking another artist's surface treatment by emulating his brushwork, while all the underlying structure of your image's various elements are totally wrong. No amount of surface treatment will save a painting is all the foundation elements are problematic. It's just like how no amount of special effects will save a really bad screenplay with bad acting and bad direction.

Artists like Jaime Jones are compelling not just because of their brushwork, but because they have very strong foundations as artists. They have mastered all the critical foundations like composition, perspective, lighting/values, color theory, anatomy/figure, etc. If they didn't have those foundations, their brushwork would be meaningless.
 
  05 May 2013
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.