Report: Superman/Batman Movie Planned

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

REPLY TO THREAD
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09 September 2013   #136
Well I still think that... even those old myths (and you see a lot of Artists, Writers, Directors using that word to describe the modern film, comic books, superheroes)... The Myths have a lot of basic entertainment value as well as core values communication.

They didn't have TV, so all they had were these poems and myth things, which I think at the time also doubled as scripture, right? But at its basic level you still have an audience and you still have a storyteller.

So you still have to sort of "sell" it... with the action.. the "marquee characters"....Magic armor, magic swords, sexual content..... Crossovers, spin-offs.

It is true that today it's all taken a bit less seriously... But much of the same logic is still apparent.

Primarily that, much in the same way that say "Achilles" can have multiple pieces of work with prominence: Homer wrote him into the "Iliad" where Achilles died, but Statius wrote the "Achilleid" which is essentially Achilles Year One. Like you said, Stan Lee, the original creator of Spider-Man continues to write his own continuity of Spider-Man on his own... And therefore you can have any number of Batman within validity of canon: Nolanverse Batman, Bob Kane Batman, Frank Miller Batman....including BEN AFFLECK BATMAN... as all it takes is for a legally recognized source to sign off as author!

The Circle is Complete!
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 09 September 2013   #137
The funny thing is that ancient storytellers and modern comic book creators have some connection (the use of magic and super powers) but they also have restrictions--in different areas.
The ancients had to follow a traditional story plot, they couldnt have Achilles escape death at Troy--or have the Trojans win the war. They could embellish but for the most famous characters their fate is set until they die then its murky but they don't come back as normal.

Comics can have characters escape death or live a different life in another dimension or meet themselves (which doesn't happen in ancient stories--except perhaps when a deity impersonates someone).
But the ancients were more free to have characters act out of self interest than comic books can. Ancient heroes dont do much public service--a lot of the time their motives were self interest (i.e Perseus is returning home and sees a girl being sacrificed to a monster so he rescues her--and takes her as his wife. Not exactly "thank you Superman!" and he flies off).


Modern comic super heroes are primarily motivated by public duty.
And there's a lot of restriction in what they can do even with no comics code.

And commercial interests play a big part. Having to have new stories every month (or week).

We dont know how much commerce was involved in ancient storytellers' decision making. For the audience it may have been a choice between "listen to a street story or go watch a sunset."
maybe the storytellers got paid in bread or didnt get paid. Who knows.


There was oral poetry and plays, but also ancient novels for those who could read. They had stories that focused on the adventures of every day people with very little or no supernatural involvement like Daphnis and Chloe.
I think they would be the equivalent of a "chick flick" to some extent.

So yes there are things the same between ancient myth stories and modern comic ones, but I think some big differences too.
There is only a vague similarity between Hercules and Superman or Odysseus and Batman when you look at each of their actions and motives.
Same for other ancient heroes like Gilgamesh or Samson.
 
Old 09 September 2013   #138
I think there is that element of "building upon what was built before."

Like you said... there's that old Greek way of writing/telling these stories.
Then later someone says: "OK.. but what if...?"

And they write something.. and then later on someone thinks: "What if... ?"

And something else comes out. In a way today's stories are a result of all this building-over.

The fact you can mention in a sentence how Achilles can "escape death at Troy"..... You weren't writing a new story. But the thought occurred to you because the current text with him dying already exists. Someone else may think that would be a good idea...because it's another "What if?" question.

Same with Earth 1, Earth 2, in the DC world...in the Marvel universe... it's all this building over.

You can argue it's now hit overdrive and we got all this stuff.... but all of that is an evolution of what came before.

So in a way it's all Original but also Un-Original.
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 09 September 2013   #139
Originally Posted by CGIPadawan: The fact you can mention in a sentence how Achilles can "escape death at Troy"..... You weren't writing a new story. But the thought occurred to you because the current text with him dying already exists. Someone else may think that would be a good idea...because it's another "What if?" question.


It also occurred to Homer. In the Iliad Achilles does talk about leaving the war and having had a choice (I think a prophecy) that he can go to troy and die soon or not go and live a long life. But to do that latter will deprive him of glory which was of value--immortality through exploits. But not literal immortality.

Zeus also talks about altering Fate to save one of his demigod sons who is about to be killed but "cant" because it would create more problems (including other deities in Olympus doing the same for their demi-kids).

But its very linear and concrete and the talk of alternatives is wishful thinking--not "hey lets create another dimension!"
They didnt do that from what I can gather.

But I digress.
 
Old 09 September 2013   #140
Originally Posted by kelgy: But its very linear and concrete and the talk of alternatives is wishful thinking--not "hey lets create another dimension!"
They didnt do that from what I can gather.


No my point was they had used their "current time and effort" to come up with Fate or Choice.... then stopped there.

Having established that for future generations opened up the idea of "Well why can't we do that AND the other one in an ALTERNATE DIMENSION?" - that becomes the use of "current time and effort" of generations later that didn't have to think about Troy in that way.

Alternate Dimensions, in turn, become the raw material of future imagineer's "current time and effort" to do something else.

It's not digressing... I think in reality this is the thought process of humanity going forward.
It's like how we can only build a Hadron Collider today and at no point earlier in history.

People have different views of this... And if you think the Batman discussion is something, there's a lot more overflowing on the plate labelled: "Ghostbusters".
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 09 September 2013   #141
Originally Posted by CGIPadawan: No my point was they had used their "current time and effort" to come up with Fate or Choice.... then stopped there.





Oh I see.
There was an ancient greco-roman story about a time traveler but I think it was like a Rip van Winkle situation. There may have been discussions about alternate dimensions though. I dont think we can assume it didnt occur to some people and just wasnt picked up or circulated. The idea of biological change in species was theorized by some ancient Greek (forgot the name).

There are also robots in the Iliad too--golden tripods that move by themselves on wheels and mechanical servants made of gold. They are powered by divine influence but the idea of a physical machine that can move on its own is there.
How long before that concept appeared again in a literary product I dont know but it was there.
 
Old 04 April 2014   #142
Originally Posted by JoeyP88:
Bruce Wayne is his true identity. Superman, Hawkman, etc need SECRET identities to give them a real life. Bruce Wayne already has a real life.



Ha! I had to dig back into this after seeing this picture.
The artists got it right.

Artist version of Bruce Wayne

Last edited by rhinton : 04 April 2014 at 02:39 PM.
 
Old 04 April 2014   #143
Originally Posted by kelgy: Oh I see.
There was an ancient greco-roman story about a time traveler but I think it was like a Rip van Winkle situation. There may have been discussions about alternate dimensions though. I dont think we can assume it didnt occur to some people and just wasnt picked up or circulated. The idea of biological change in species was theorized by some ancient Greek (forgot the name).

There are also robots in the Iliad too--golden tripods that move by themselves on wheels and mechanical servants made of gold. They are powered by divine influence but the idea of a physical machine that can move on its own is there.
How long before that concept appeared again in a literary product I dont know but it was there.


Yes, exactly... my theory is that it's a "building over" like I said where we go one over anything previous either towards something with more subtlety or something more outrageous.

If you trace for example the "ancestry" for some of the things we do..... like PACIFIC RIM... you can trace its "ancestry" through things like MAZINGER Z.... and then further back until possibly to those self-moving machines you refer to in old Greek tales.

But it is also in our nature to imagine different situations. Surely the creators of Batman and Superman didn't always envision them meeting together from Day 1. Surely many of the villains that existed in either line of books, and eventually in the Justice League body of work didn't exist as well.

However, that is the nature of it... because people in the future will try to re-apply it. And it's not just in the team-ups or relationships... The character Batman looks physically different from book arc to book arc, and from crossover to crossover.

For example, there's this version of Batman:


Yes, I know that's Damian Wayne.. but that was just to "soften" the impact of what was really an artist imagining if he could put the BELT on the OUTSIDE as well as the "briefs". lol.

So in that way... even if not formally placed in an "alternate dimension"... It is "sort of" an alternate dimension each and every time.

Having said that... This Batman/Superman thing is at par with what DC/Warner is allowed to do.

Which is summed up in what I said at the start of the exchange: "It can end up being anything now."

It's "Canon" AND it's all "Non-Canon"... simultaneously. Such is the joy of being in the entertainment business!
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation

Last edited by CGIPadawan : 04 April 2014 at 12:00 AM.
 
Old 04 April 2014   #144
Originally Posted by rhinton: Ha! I had to dig back into this after seeing this picture.
The artists got it right.

Artist version of Bruce Wayne

Thanks for the trip down Nebezial lane. After following the link I was at his gallery for an hour.
__________________
HMC: Model Collection
WIP: Harris Nut House
WIP: WarCraft Troll
wyattharris.com Dig it!
 
Old 04 April 2014   #145
Ha! Yeah, his stuff is pretty awesome and inspiring.
 
Old 10 October 2014   #146
[
Originally Posted by JoeyP88: Batman is the means to an end. An end which is the goal of one man. Bruce Wayne. Its a persona which is a masterfully crafted tool to achieve a job. A tool designed to achieve a very specific emotional and psychological response among those who have to deal with him. The real story is the man under the mask. What drives him. What makes him tick. What causes him to invest the blood sweat and tears into the effort. This is a truly compelling story far more worthy than a simple image of a guy in a bat suit breaking bones, smashing things, or crushing villains.



Saw Gotham recently. I was thrilled to see that they may actually try to tell this part of the Batman story. I've only seen two of the shows so far but I'm intrigued by the whole Superhero story without a single costume to date. So far it seems to be mostly a story about Gordon, but if it does a slow transition to Bruce Wayne as the lead role, it might be an interesting product. The visuals, so far, are absolutely stunning.

Joey
 
reply share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.