CGTalk > Techniques > Compositing and Editing
Login register
reply share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-18-2017, 06:01 PM   #1
shawnkearney
Explorer
portfolio
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 5
Z-Depth vs Deep?

What is the technical difference between OpenEXR Depth and a Z AOV?
 
Old 05-07-2017, 09:23 PM   #2
Midgardsormr
PRO
portfolio
Bryan Ray
VFX Generalist
Los Angeles, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 138
It's been a while since this question was asked. I hope you're still interested in the answer! (I have neither rendered nor used a deep pixel image, so the following is purely theoretical.)

A Z AOV gives a single sample of depth for a pixel. "This pixel is 12258cm from the camera."

Deep imaging takes samples at multiple depths. Suppose you have a scene with a car driving through smoke. A single pixel might be made up of information from the smoke, with samples from many different depths contributing to the color; the glass of the driver's side window; the glass of the passenger's side window; more smoke; and finally whatever is behind the car. Each of those elements might have a sample in the deep image, allowing you to, for instance, put a tint on the windows that will not affect the color of the foreground smoke.

If all you have is Z, you couldn't do a real depth of field blur on that scene because everything is locked into a single z sample (likely the driver's window) and would be at the same depth. You'd have to render in layers instead: foreground smoke (with and without holdouts), exterior glass surface, car interior and interior glass surface, refracted smoke (to get the background smoke seen through the windows) and background.

Given how large a deep image can be, rendering in layers may well be more efficient.
__________________
Bryan Ray
www.bryanray.name
 
Old 05-09-2017, 05:15 AM   #3
shawnkearney
Explorer
portfolio
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 5
Thank you for your reply, it is appreciated. But yes, I have already kind of figured this all out and started doing some implementation at work as well.

Unfortunately deep compositing volumes is a bit too slow for us to utilize as much as I'd like to.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 06:19 PM   #4
Midgardsormr
PRO
portfolio
Bryan Ray
VFX Generalist
Los Angeles, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 138
From everything I've heard, I think that's true all the way around. Deep's a great idea, but the hardware's not quite ready for it.
__________________
Bryan Ray
www.bryanray.name
 
Old 05-15-2017, 05:09 PM   #5
arnavbanerjiart
Scout
portfolio
Arnav Banerji
India
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnkearney
Thank you for your reply, it is appreciated. But yes, I have already kind of figured this all out and started doing some implementation at work as well.

Unfortunately deep compositing volumes is a bit too slow for us to utilize as much as I'd like to.


Hey, I was looking into deep compositing as well for one of the animations I'm working on so I'd like the scene to be tuned for deep if I do use it.
I understand the file samples are quite large but what do you mean by its slow? Does it take much longer to render each frame?
 
reply share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.