" H " has taken over all Effects Jobs, almost all of it. is it good or bad ?

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

Thread Tools Display Modes
  02 February 2012
" H " has taken over all Effects Jobs, almost all of it. is it good or bad ?

Hello all enthusiast,

I ain't intend to start a war or comparison whats good or whats bad. Just doing a reality check here. I am here to share the fact that I have been going through as an Maya Effects artist. Believe it or not Every Major Studio has switched completely to Houdini because of its awesomeness.

I have been using Maya since I started my career 8 years back. Its a been a very interesting ride & great learning experience & I am still trying to master few areas as my learning goes on. but now I am quite worried after all this years of experience I have to master another tool. No matter I might quickly grasp the tool as most of the fundamentals in particles, fluids or rigid bodies remains same but I am not sure If I will have same level of confidence of what I have gain through years of experience using Maya.I know for the fact as being an VFX artist, one must always stay updated with latest tools & technology & learning multiple skills is no harm but I feel sad on the part I have spent so much time on Maya particles-fluids & now I have to try things in a newer way by using Houdini.

As what I heard & Know Houdini is really a great package/tool & on the other hand Maya is great & robust in few areas but unfortunately its not an complete effects package in terms of effects rendering . Maya's updates are too weak, Particle Rendering has always been an long lasting issue. Rigid bodies are still so terrible to use it in production.

People end up writing their own tool or script to make it work in Maya as a plugin : they have to be, because the Maya architecture itself is just not made to handle technologies like that using the core architecture. That's where Houdini is different: nothing is a plugin/black box, everything is controllable. And that's essential for high-end production. So I guess I am loosing my steam over Maya's future.
Its hard to find a job at big VFX houses based on maya ground at the moment but I am making all my efforts to quickly switch over this tool " houdini" which is in so much demand at the moment. I know learning never goes waste but I might still say after mastering houdini that my fav prefernece of tool is Maya as I like doing it that way but it doesnt matter how you do it & what you do. What matters is Output.

& for the folks who say Tool is not important Its An Artist of how he approaches to achieve the effects. I am so not buying this word. My worst Experience I faced in my interviews by one of the biggest VFX house recruiters. ( dont want to name but Its one of the big players in market). They post the FX td job details as " Needs To Know
Full knowledge of Maya (Mel knowledge a plus) and/ or Houdini
Effects animation experience
Familiarity with pipeline issues
Experience in producing effects such as smoke, fire, clouds, water, steam and explosions, plus experience with particle rendering and voxel based systems
Minimum of 6 months demonstrable experience in effects work on feature films
A good general TD background is desirable "

I qualified almost all the points except the Houdini part, the discrepancy was My knowldege of Houdini was less or say very specific. The recruiter didnt even bother to set up my interview with any fx related person. She took the whole interview on her own. I knew what I was dealing with but the sad part was throughout whole interview she didnt ask even anything about my reel & the knowledge or skills I showcased in my portfolio. All they wanted to know " how Much I know Houdini ? " " Can you do all those effects in Houdini because we are looking for people who are strong in Houdini not in Maya " . I being honest I admitted that I am not an houdini Pro & My knowledge is very adequate in Houdini. Guess what happened ?? I guess My application went to trash.

So folks I am not here to encourage any tool but as being an Fx guy like many of us here. Switch your gears or you might face same of what I went through. I am Moving already but My love for Maya will always stay Young & Bright. Hope Autodesk do something about it to make it a complete Effective Effects Package.

- Vik
Freelance Effects Artist

Last edited by viki164 : 02 February 2012 at 10:14 PM.
  02 February 2012
Ive been hoping Autodesk will give some major attention to its fx toolset everytime a new version releases.

Nucleus has been the smallest of bright lights and hopefully when Maximus tech or the ability to multithread nparticles happens it will bring Maya back into at least a considered role for FX at bigger studios.

I too am faced with learning a whole new program in my very limited spare time. After balancing a full time job 50+ hours a week, my family and my commitments to them I really dont feel like sitting down and learning something new.

An unforgiving business we chose for ourselves. Your work is amazing tho Vikas, you've inspired me on many occasions, I think that you will find work that will be happy to have such a talented artist be a part of their team.

Last edited by mandark1011 : 02 February 2012 at 05:10 PM.
  02 February 2012

thanks for the heads up Vikas. I myself have my heart set on Maya....personally I go back and forth from 3dsmax to Maya for Fx, but never really dove too much into Houdini. I guess I should start. =[ Although i'm pretty sure lots of Fx houses in LA use Maya and 3dsmax for Fx....maybe there transitioning?

In any case,
Autodesk .... please update Maya Effects Package to compete better with houdini.


Last edited by DDelapena : 02 February 2012 at 11:26 PM.
  02 February 2012
People often talk about tools vs. artistic ability with regards to FX and CG in general and I think a lot of the time they miss the point. Artist approach is important but Tools enable artists to achieve their vision, and that's all they really do. The key is to have the right tools for the job.

Houdini is another tool and adding it to your bag of tricks is going to make you a better FX artist because it's going to enable you to use more efficient tools for certain jobs. Max/Fume, Maya/Nucleus, Softimage/ICE, RealFlow and C4D all have their place in the pipeline to name just a few. Hell, I can't tell you how often I've seen FX artists use particles in Maya when Particular in Nuke or AE would be three times as fast and allow twice as much control.

Maya is a great package to know. It's always seen reasonably strong usage an it has a tendency to force people to understand 'how things work' more than many other packages. That said it doesn't and won't do everything better than other programs. So I say add Houdini to your bag of tricks and embrace it for what it does well.

If you have an understanding of the fundamentals of FX and 3D and you can communicate with your team and leverage resources well then learning another package won't take you long. In a few years something else will probably be taking names and kicking arse for dynamics and you're probably going to have to pick up some of that program too.

Learning new tools can be fun and interesting. It can broaden your skillset and your employability as well as making you a better artist by forcing you to see new perspectives. The question really is do you want to be an FX Artist/Supervisor or a Maya user?
Critcal feedback example #62: "Well instead of the Stalinist purges and the divorce and the investigation ... it could be about losing a balloon."
  02 February 2012
@ Axiomatic : Thanks for the feedback & I must say as an FX artist One must stay updated with current technology regardless of what tools have been used in production.

I worked for Dreamworks Animation Studio for past three years , they had their own proprietary tools in FX pipeline & I easily adapted those tools to blend in, so learning & adapting is not an problem here. My point was to bring out how Quickly " H " has taken over Maya. Maya is loosing its ground in VFX industry. Autodesk should do something about it.

Also My reaction was on the recruiter front, these days they ain't seeing the talent or skills one already has , what matters is the candidates knows Houdini or not? so at such short coarse of time Its difficult to master any other tool. Anyway the bottom line of this story is Houdini is now leading & one must should possess the knowledge of " H ", if he or she wants to be in FX for a long term.

Last edited by viki164 : 02 February 2012 at 08:03 AM.
  02 February 2012
Hi Vikas, i think that you need to get over this bad interview , cause you definitly have the skills to find an excellent jobs.

For Maya you're right i really feel the wind turning few month ago. But Many great companies like ILM, WETA, MPC , has a Maya base workflow + Custom R&D tools for FX jobs. And i'm sure that those companies don't expect you to be proficient the day you start in all their tools ...

I do think that images you produce are more important than the software you use. And i do think that people who hire guys base on technicalls skills on a certain package even if they produce ugly render are very rare ( i hope so ) I also think that the best FX reels i've seen are not always houdini ones ... So you must take your faith back on your job reasearch.

That being said, in the last month i start to learn Houdini, i was very doubtful about this "so powerful tool" , that i find too complex for my needs. But after one month i must admit that i fall in love with Houdini. The way shading works , the power of mantra , the low level control and the fact that you don't need any pluggin anymore. I'm trying to switch 100% on Houdini, cause honestly i don't see how AD could bring the gap beetween the 2 apps.

Maya is like coding in Python you get a powerfull object oriented code, Houdini is more C like you are 2 levels down , and your always lost with pointers and memalloc but you get the control on your machine.

Houdini has a price to pay : complexity but the rewards is pleasure to work , pleasure to use a logic tool that do what you ask for. And at the end thats one of the reason i now prefer to switch to houdini, its because i'm not frustrated all the days. The maya FX workflow is now really old , goal , hardware buffer etc ... all those stuff are from an other era i think !
  02 February 2012
Sounds like the recruiter was an idiot. If they need you to know Houdini they should put it in the original notice so they don't waste everyones time.

Mind you if you get to the interview stage and they're not even bringing in a team leader or other qualified person to evaluate your ability then all sorts of warning bells should be going off anyway.
Critcal feedback example #62: "Well instead of the Stalinist purges and the divorce and the investigation ... it could be about losing a balloon."
  02 February 2012
That's Exactly what I meant Axiomatic.
Believe it or not its a one big VFX studio having around 1000 employees & branches in London & Singapore. They should really put the original notice of what talent & skills they require irrespective of tools :/.
  02 February 2012
Oi Seb! No DNEG? Houdini's presence has been strong in London for at least 5 years and is steadily growing stronger every day. You will find most houses these days use both Maya and Houdini (both separate and together in conjunction) because there are just somethings Maya cant do or are a total pain in the arse.

Damn Vik, that sucks... too late now, but you should of simply said you know some and can definitely learn more Houdini as your reel shows you have FX skills and its just another tool to learn in house, just like proprietary tools.

Why not give that 'other house' a call and see how your application is coming along. Call.. not email.

Good luck!


Reel - 3DInk.com
Filmography -IMDB

*please read- cyanbsl.blogspot.com/*

Last edited by HowardM : 02 February 2012 at 01:32 PM.
  02 February 2012
Howard > I was refering to the best companies with a maya + custom tools workflow ...
in opposition to the Maya/Houdini base companies ... and of course i wouldn't have omit Dneg , D2 and Imageworks in that case .... You know what i mean !

Vikas > i'm pretty sure you'r contact was from the production side. And if you recontact them again and again i'm pretty sure that they will transmit you reel to an FX supervisor. Your fluids skills will be very interesting for any highend fx team !

cheers !
  02 February 2012
too bad Vik, but for me it's hard to imagine that you won't get a job in this business with your skills / reel...

@topic: No wonder Houdini is the nr1 fx software. Just look at the beta videos from h12, all the gpu accelerated stuff. That's sweeeeeet
  02 February 2012
every time i try to go into houdini, for some reason i get back to maya, there is a big and good reason for that.... mantra.. mantra is so sloooooowwwww, i just hit my head against wall when i render in mantra.

i get a good fluid system with a nice preset in MAYA in one click, in houdini you have to create a fluid system from scratch.

maya is the REAL solution for every day
  02 February 2012
People need to learn new tools all the time. If you stop learning, you stop growing, and you get complacent. There's always going to be paradigm shifts. That's a good thing. If everyone just wanted to stick with the same thing forever, we'd still be using PowerAnimator and PRISMS.
  02 February 2012
I've been learning/using Houdini on and off for the last few years and will soon be using it in production when I start my next job. I kinda see learning new packages as part of being an FX Artist really, and in a few years I'll probably be learning something else.

I honestly think you'll have a blast learning Houdini, it's an awesome package and you're a very talented FX Artist.
  02 February 2012
Personally anyone can learn new packages. It is up to the person's determination.
Houdini is great in certain areas whereas maya can give you better control in others.
I have found houdini's sop, chops and dops to be very powerful. Especially dops which is itself might if it was a separate package it would sell.
Maya's expression based particles is still strong, also how one can layer fields and write plugins. Maya's fluid is great too, especially 2012; you send a high res domain to the a multi proc machine and you get some really nice sims quickly.
h12's fluid solver is catching up it is definitely faster than h11 and is comparable in speeds to maya 2009.
The fact you can generate sdf and use it to collide with your fluids, not mentioning one can sim any grid you like is a huge deal that maya doesn't have.
Dops is houdini's greatest technology but also the weakest link. If they can get the graph to evaluate quickly for lots of dop objects it will really take down maya.
H12 is indeed a great package sidefx has definitely raised the bar from H11 and a lot of companies are noticing all these new technology and asking "why are we still using maya?"
just my 2 cents...

tldr: keep on applying never give up and do learn houdini.
reply share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.