CGTalk > Main > News
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-05-2013, 10:32 PM   #1
New Member
Cole Harris
3D Generalist
San Mateo, USA
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
Arrow New Nvidia Quadro Series K5000, K4000, K2000, K600

So there it is, new Quadro's... yay... I imagine its all going to come down to the drivers and or support but based on the specs alone these things look seriously overpriced (which is to be expected I suppose). The K4000 has a core clock of 800MHz with 768 CUDA cores and 3GB while its comparative cousin the GTX 680 has a core clock of 1006MHz and 1536 CUDA cores (not mentioning of course the newly announced GTX Titan). Also somewhat surprisingly the K4000 only has a 192-bit memory bus width.

Hopefully now that Quadros will be sharing the Kepler architecture with their GTX siblings we'll see some better driver support in the near future.

Anyways look forward to hearing your guys's thoughts.
Old 03-06-2013, 01:32 AM   #2
Use Your Tools.
sonictk's Avatar
Siew Yi%2BLiang%2B
Tech. Artist
Heroes of Newerth team
Kalamazoo, Singapore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 70
Just as I bought a new W530 with a k2000m, too... :X
Old 03-06-2013, 01:36 PM   #3
nimajneb's Avatar
Benjamin A. Slack
Artist / Animator
Kalamazoo, USA
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 230
K4000 looks like the more similar to a GTX660Ti with that smaller bus. So 4x the cost? That's about normal for Quadros. I took a calculated risk on my last workstation build because I'm only semi-pro and couldn't justify the outlay. So far, knock on wood, so good. Besides for some maya particles weirdness, the 660Ti is functioning adequately. Until this, I'd always used Quadros, because that was the accepted wisdom. Not so sure anymore. For saving that much cash, I'm willing to make the experiment.
"I am a leaf on the wind..." -Wash
Old 03-06-2013, 03:02 PM   #4
c:\>format c:_
Mirko Jankovic
Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 777
Send a message via MSN to mirkoj
if they used same spec cards for gaming, all those GHz and everything AND drivers for quadros than maybe difference would mid.. but using slower weaker spec cards with better drivers and charging like 4-5 times more... cmon.
but as long as there are companies that are buying htey will keep doing this,.. just recently saw interesting graph with pro cards making something like 5-10% of sae compared to game cards but also at the same time bringing like 30-40% income from sales ... don't hold me on numbers but something like that.

Need some help with rendering an Redshift project?
Old 03-07-2013, 03:37 AM   #5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
The K4000 is sexy. Small, not much power consumption and good.
Old 03-13-2013, 11:29 AM   #6
Alex Spy
London, United Kingdom
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 63
I have two quadros 4000 sitting on secondary pci. I am not going down that route again unless there is some serious improvement from Nvidia. Huge memory, great performance ... Currently the 4000 is slower than the 150 gtx 660 in almost every aspect.
my website
Old 03-13-2013, 11:29 AM   #7
CGTalk Moderation
CGTalk Forum Leader
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,478
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.