CGTalk > Work in Progress and Critique > WIP/Critique: 2D
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-01-2013, 01:49 AM   #1
tibbi
Veteran
 
tibbi's Avatar
portfolio
USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 90
Yet more painting practice

I'm working from another painting by Daniel Gerhartz. I chose this one because the brush work is bold enough for me to easily read it.

I'm using a custom brush that's giving some of the results I'm after. This go round I'm color picking as I just want to focus on emulating, or at lest trying to emulate, the brush work.



 
Old 07-02-2013, 05:35 AM   #2
tibbi
Veteran
 
tibbi's Avatar
portfolio
USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 90
Today's progress.

 
Old 07-06-2013, 01:20 AM   #3
tibbi
Veteran
 
tibbi's Avatar
portfolio
USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 90
Though still far from a true copy, it's been the best I've done to this point. I saw more and understood better what I was seeing. I tended to over exaggerate the paint strokes and didn't get them placed correctly in many instances.

 
Old 07-06-2013, 06:09 AM   #4
Lunatique
Pragmatic Dreamer
 
Lunatique's Avatar
CGTalk Forum Leader
portfolio
Robert Chang
Artist|Writer|Composer
Photographer|Director
Lincoln, USA
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,640

One very important thing to learn about brushwork, is that no brushstroke exists without context. In fact, it's very often the context that drives brushwork decisions.

Brushstrokes convey form, controls readability, manage edges, selectively detail (thus control focal points), creates visual interest (even the most inconsequential areas in your painting should still entertain your audience, just like no movie or book should have boring parts--every part matters to the overall grand scheme of the work), and so on.

There are going to be many things about brushwork that you will not understand right now, no matter how faithfully you copy, because you lack the insights of the overall context I mentioned. To advance forward, you'll have to place just as much priority in the study of the visual art foundations (composition, perspective, values, lighting, color theory, anatomy/figure, etc). In a way, brushwork is really a layer of skin over all of that underlying structure that creates the context, similar to how we look externally has to be build on the internal structure of bones, muscles, fat, blood vessels, etc.
 
Old 07-07-2013, 04:04 PM   #5
tibbi
Veteran
 
tibbi's Avatar
portfolio
USA
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 90
I realized as I was doing this that I don't understand what drove the painter's artistic decisions. Whatever understanding or inspiration he had is lost to me. I'm at best parroting the surface form and color. Artistically speaking, it leaves me with an empty feeling.

The exercise is valuable however. My control over the program increases with every attempt. I see more of the elements of an image and how they all work together as a whole.
 
Old 07-09-2013, 10:47 PM   #6
BillyWJ
Frequenter
portfolio
William White
www.FusedArts.com
Katonah, United States
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibbi
I realized as I was doing this that I don't understand what drove the painter's artistic decisions. Whatever understanding or inspiration he had is lost to me. I'm at best parroting the surface form and color. Artistically speaking, it leaves me with an empty feeling.

The exercise is valuable however. My control over the program increases with every attempt. I see more of the elements of an image and how they all work together as a whole.

The painting is done in a painterly, impressionistic style, which uses scumbling and dry brush, and loose, expressive brush strokes. It's VERY difficult to capture this digitally, so don't feel too bad. You might want to download a trial copy of Painter, it has more of an organic approach to brushes, but be warned, it has a steep learning curve.

Painting that way is something you have to experience to really "get" - since I came from a traditional art background (and a deep love for Impressionism), I get the painting. Also, the artist could have been working much larger in real life, so the small, flick of the finger strokes you are doing with a Wacom is a different experience if the artist is using their whole arm to make bigger strokes with a brush. That's why figure drawing in real life is so different, it's about using a large piece of paper, like 24x36" or bigger, and using your entire arm to make long, continuous strokes with the charcoal - if you're doing it right, your arm should be sore after class! That can't be experienced digitally, until they make 24x36" Wacom Cintiqs.

If you want to head towards this style of painting, digitally or for real, jump into Impressionism and start studying the masters, like Monet, and try to work out how to be more expressive with a Wacom, like saving up for a bigger tablet.
 
Old 07-09-2013, 10:47 PM   #7
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,481
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.