critiqs for Modeling Figure for Animation

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

Thread Tools Display Modes
  06 June 2013
critiqs for Modeling Figure for Animation

I would like to know, If where is any Arena on my Mesh is Horrible for skinning/rigging.
Also, I do wounder, if I had a finished UV map and I may want to change the Geometry, that is the easy way to fix the UV.

( Vertex with 3 Edges) = Pol
( vertexes with more than 4 Edges) = Stars

Greatings Hanssome

Link to bigger images:

Last edited by independhans : 06 June 2013 at 02:23 PM.
  06 June 2013
Hi, I saw your thread in General Discussion, and I'm assuming you'd like answers here.

Generally speaking, there are no ultra-strict rules when it comes to topology. As far as I understand, the recent trend is letting the rigging departments handle it, while modelers work on, well, modeling. The reasoning here is actually quite good - in order to know which topology works for deformation purposes, and which doesn't, you need to actually have experience in creating deformations.

That being said, there are some 'poles', as you called them, in the neck and clavicle area, which really needn't be there. The reason they are there (I'm assuming) is because a lot of your quads are stretching, and are forcing you to turn your edge flows (which should be with as few turns as possible). Oh and, think about using triangles in some places instead of poles if it helps simplify your flow, it's not as bad as people say. Another rule of thumb you can safely adhere to is that 'stars' with more than 5 edges are a no-no.

The grid overall needs to be more homogenous (meaning the quads should be more evenly distributed), this is the main issue. What you did in the sternal notch area, and how you are driving the edges in groupings of 3 or more over the nose illustrates this issue. Also, a lot of your edges are zig-zagging between vertices, when they should not be changing the direction of their curvature. Modeling / retopology applications allow you to fix these 2 things with the relax function or its variants.

As far as the UVs go, making new cuts will usually change the textel density in some way, but afterwards it's just a matter of, again, relaxing these areas (in the UV space).

Depending on your needs and goals, none of these issues may be 'horrible'.
  06 June 2013
Thanks, that is really helpful.

If I think on Needs, I want use it for serveral Animation Shots, and I want in 3D Print it in Pose.

"You need to actually have experience in creating deformations."

I would to use Maya with Mudbox for Animation for some HD Shots there the Charater is repairing some Elepments on the Surface on a Spaceship, and Export a Still to nefabb Studio.

I had created before a Cybergirl, but the point that I didnt design it so it would be a closed surface, I did consider to redo it with a better knownlage that I want to arviev.

So or so, I will rigg first a Human, Becouse I gess to Rigg an Charater with diffent Material that are diffent movable is not easy.
  06 June 2013
Will this 6 diamands be a problem in this case, It´s a shot of the hand.
  06 June 2013
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.