CGTalk > Software > Autodesk Miscellaneous > Autodesk Softimage
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2013, 10:04 AM   #1
janzak
New Member
 
janzak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Post Production level renderer for solo projects

Hey guys,
I've been using Mental Ray in Softimage for the past 5 years but after using Arnold I can't go back. I'm now looking for a renderer suited for single/two person projects, i.e. not Arnold since licensing is more expensive and it's built for larger projects.

At the moment I'm looking at Vray and Octane. Vray since it seems to be easy enough to get photo realistic renders (compared to MR) and Octane for its realtime previewing.

What I value is; fast lookdev, photo real rendering and streamlined tweakability. I'm willing to invest in a CUDA enabled GPU (Titan) if that would put Octane ahead.

Any other renderers for XSI you prefer for solo projects?

All thoughts much appreciated.
Jan
 
Old 11-02-2013, 12:27 AM   #2
lucericr
PRO
 
lucericr's Avatar
portfolio
Luc-Eric
Maya UI Team
Montreal, Canada
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 127
there are a couple of other renders for Softimage that are worth a look. 3Delight, and on the GPU side, there is RedShift. you can find more discussions about them on "si community".
 
Old 11-02-2013, 06:35 AM   #3
mantragora
Old Member
 
mantragora's Avatar
portfolio
To be, or not to be, TD ?
mantragora
hell, Antarctica
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 159
3Delight is overcomplicated compared to Arnold and RedShift is still in beta, I think. Switch to Modo .


EDIT: Oh, they released RedShift. Going to red some posts .
__________________
If it's not real-time, it's a piece of shit not a state of the art technology" - me

magic happens here... sometimes
go nodeway
 
Old 11-03-2013, 05:27 PM   #4
oktawu
visual stuff
 
oktawu's Avatar
Octavian
okto
Earth, Romania
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 470
Redshift has gone into open beta. As soon as they get their payment system in order, anyone will be able to access it. To be honest, right now, i'd say it is the best alternative for small studios / freelancers. Hands down.
__________________
Portfolio
Linkedin
 
Old 11-04-2013, 09:10 AM   #5
ViCoX
Coffee.
 
ViCoX's Avatar
portfolio
Juhani Karlsson
3D artist
Talvi Digital
Helsinki, Finland
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 326
Send a message via MSN to ViCoX
I think you answered this question yourself - Vray. I digg Arnold the most but its exellent too.
I can`t say Modo would be bad - you can get alembic plugin to Soft and get everything to Modo for rendering. The render nodes are very affordable or should I say free.
 
Old 11-04-2013, 07:01 PM   #6
Kzin
Expert
 
Kzin's Avatar
portfolio
Holger Tesch
Shading/Lighting Artist
Germany
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 754
Send a message via ICQ to Kzin
redshift is the way to go. arnold is to slow a for single person, same for vray. with redshift you can easily decrease your rendertime with a additionel graphic card. but its also fast with one card, also fast enough for animations.
 
Old 11-04-2013, 11:31 PM   #7
ThE_JacO
MOBerator-X
 
ThE_JacO's Avatar
CGSociety Member
portfolio
Raffaele Fragapane
That Creature Dude
Animal Logic
Sydney, Australia
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,954
Leaving it to "solo" is probably not enough info to be honest.
If you need to produce stills, or short foreground character contributions to plates, then Arnold or VRay might be your best pick, depending on what your prevalent setting is like (their estimators tend to shine in completely different circumstances, with VRay performing better on the interiors architecture lighting scenarios).

If you need to produce a lot of footage without a mini farm available, and you don't have the complexity and bandwidth requirements that only an offline renderer can cope with (particularly in terms of footprint) then Redshift is likely to be a much better choice on account of turnaround time.

There's no clear winner across all fronts, it's always the usual juggling of fast, cheap and good (loosely comparing, not those three attributes specifically as much as the same concept) with any given engine really shining at only one or two of those at the same time.
__________________
"As an online CG discussion grows longer, the probability of the topic being shifted to subsidies approaches 1"

Free Maya Nodes
 
Old 11-25-2013, 04:30 PM   #8
mirkoj
c:\>format c:_
portfolio
Mirko Jankovic
Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 745
Send a message via MSN to mirkoj
With Redshift for solo freelance production you can't get wrong.
There are couple details still missing but there is open beta as mentioned so go a head and give it a try. Nothing to loose.
__________________
www.cgfolio.com

Need some help with rendering an Redshift project?
http://www.gpuoven.com/
 
Old 11-25-2013, 04:30 PM   #9
CGTalk Moderation
Lord of the posts
CGTalk Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,066,481
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
__________________
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.