Looking for advice on 2 possible setups.

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  07 July 2013
Looking for advice on 2 possible setups.

So I have an i7 3770 on my farm and my workstation is an i7 950.
In order to move my workstation into the 3770 I need to make some sacrifices on the RAID 5 controller, the X77 board only has 2x PCIE slots so I cant fit my 9650SE. How much slower is onboard RAID5 and is it worth the CPU bump?
Also my old machine has 30gb 1333 and the 3770/X77 box has 8gb 1600 so there are some RAM distribution issues.

Current setup:

Machine A-
GA-X58A-UD5 with i7 950
30GB Ram 1333
Dual 660 GTX
RAID 5 using a 3ware 9650SE 3x1TB

Machine B-
X77 Extreme 4 with i7 3770
8GB Ram 1600
Old 4xx

Possible setup:
a) and b) options for ram distribution.
X58A does not take DDR3 1600

Machine A-
X77 Extreme 4 with i7 3770
a)24GB 1333 or b)8gb 1600
Dual 660 GTX
Onboard RAID 5 3x1TB

Machine B-
GA-X58A-UD5 with i7 950
a)6GB 1333 or b) 30GB 1333
Old 4xx
  07 July 2013
Just a couple notes:
Dual 660 is useless, practically nothing out there uses SLI with the sole exception of SOME parts of SOME GPU rendering engines.
DCC apps simply dont.

The 9650SE is a relatively poor controller to begin with.
They offer no Raid6 AFAIK (it's a general 3ware thing) because they are of a mind that if you can raid 10 you don't need to raid 6, which is BS as raid 6 has a considerably higher fault tolerance in failure configuration.
Raid 5 is so software dependent, and only boosts read anyway, that a dedicated controller does little for it.

It's also considered to perform somewhat poorly in anything but raid 0 or 10 configs, and it's still somewhat CPU bound anyway. A fully CPU bound onboard controller these days does just as well or better with hardly any impact than most low-end hardware ones do, especially in raid 5.
Linux (for dog years) and win 7 and 8, and modern CPUs, have made consumer level raid controllers largely useless.

Rest, things such as ram and so on, depend on your use of the platform so they are hard to comment on.
It's also not terribly clear (to me) exactly what you're asking to compare, and in what context (rendering, animating, sculpting, GPU centric stuff? They all have radically different requirements and weak spots).
Come, Join the Cult http://www.cultofrig.com - Rigging from First Principles
  07 July 2013
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
CGTalk Policy/Legalities
Note that as CGTalk Members, you agree to the terms and conditions of using this website.
Thread Closed share thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Society of Digital Artists

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.