GTX Titan VS GTX 690

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06 June 2013   #1
GTX Titan VS GTX 690

I am changing my setup. I want to see If I can add a Cintiq 24HD to my dual Dell 30 workspace. I figure that is a lot to power.


The 690 is a dual-gpu card and the Titan is a single gpu card.


What video card would be best for my top purposes.


A: Desktop environment - Large contiguous desktop
B: Zbrush
C: 3DsMax
D: Mental Ray
E: Games

I'm wondering if the dual-gpu on the 690 is worthless for just about everything except Games... But the 690 does have 3 DVI-out. The Titan has 2DVI + mini displayport.


Thanks
__________________
Mike Kime
www.pseudo-pod.com
Game Art and Design
 
Old 06 June 2013   #2
Quote:
Originally Posted by rv-el
A: Desktop environment - Large contiguous desktop

Doesn't quite matter

Quote:
B: Zbrush

Doesn't use the GPU

Quote:
C: 3DsMax

Doesn't support SLI, therefore the 690 is useless

Quote:
D: Mental Ray

CPU based (unless you mean iRay, in which case, still Titan on account of the higher memory and no DP crippling, if iRay even supports SLI anyway)

Quote:
E: Games

Just browse for benchmarks

If you want to use DCC apps SLI is still largely useless 99% of the time. The Titan is superior in every regard.
__________________
Come, Join the Cult http://www.cultofrig.com - Rigging from First Principles
 
Old 06 June 2013   #3
Get the Titanic card

"Iceberg, dead ahead!"
__________________
Matthew O'Neill
www.3dfluff.com
 
Old 06 June 2013   #4
Thanks!!! Thanks for the breakdown too. I will remember this for the future.

I probably get the Titan (or a 770/780. We'll see how this goes . Titan is expensive! ) and then hook one of my displays up using a DVI-MiniDisplayPort converter.
__________________
Mike Kime
www.pseudo-pod.com
Game Art and Design
 
Old 06 June 2013   #5
Get the 780, it has %90 of Titan's performance and you are not using anything that the extra 3gb ram would matter. I was looking into the Titan as well and couldn't justify the cost.
 
Old 06 June 2013   #6
Hi. i'm pretty green in this.
but i have a question,

I remember when the time Kepler came out, a GTX680's render much worse than a GTX470...

So i wonder if a GTX780 or a Titan will have the same issue as before?
 
Old 06 June 2013   #7
For Mari, Mudbox, and GPU accelerated comp and rendering there's a considerable gap between the 780 and the Titan due to a mix of more memory (when you need it) and non crippled DP.
For everything else, particularly in viewport, not so much and the added 300 bucks aren't worth it.

IF DP kicks in the gap is a yawning chasm computationally speaking, if single precision is used the entire stretch there's hardly more than a 10-15% difference most of the time.
__________________
Come, Join the Cult http://www.cultofrig.com - Rigging from First Principles
 
Old 07 July 2013   #8
here is a comparison done over at boxx

GTX 780 rendering benchmarks vs. GTX Titan and Tesla K20

http://boxxblogs.blogspot.com/2013/...hmark-with.html
__________________
Heights of great men reached and kept were not attained by sudden flight, but they while their companions slept were toiling upwards in the night.
 
Old 07 July 2013   #9
Thread automatically closed

This thread has been automatically closed as it remained inactive for 12 months. If you wish to continue the discussion, please create a new thread in the appropriate forum.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.