CGTalk > Technical > Technical and Hardware
Login register
Thread Closed share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-07-2012, 08:15 PM   #1
PBlades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Macbook Pro 2012 or Dell M6700 - Windows & Maya

Hi there,

I understand there are a few threads with similar topics, but just had a few questions I couldn't find answers to.

I'm looking to buy a portable workstation - Have been looking at the Dell m6700 or Macbook Pro 2012 with 16gb ram.
I would want to run windows, as not sure i'd adapt to using osx & also using windows software.
How well does windows run on mac?
I would mainly be using: Maya, Mental Ray, Vray, Zbrush, Mudbox, Photoshop, After Effects, Topogun, Nuke & Also eventually dealing with RAW video/Prores.

The appeal of the Macbook is it seems more portable, good-design and possibly better resale value?
I have a separate monitor so being a smaller screen than the dell isnt an issue.


I've been working on Dell t5400 & HP xw6400 workstations which are probably a bit dated now, but was wondering what kind of performance to expect in comparison to a Dual Xeon (a few years old) and 8gb ram desktop?

Thanks alot!
 
Old 10-08-2012, 03:58 AM   #2
cgbeige
Expert
 
cgbeige's Avatar
portfolio
Dave Girard
Opinions are mine. You can't have them.
San_Francisrococo, USA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,001
all those apps run great on OS X. Some (from my testing, mental ray for Maya, Photoshop, After Effects) are even faster in OS X than in Windows on the same hardware, so there's no point to buying a MacBook Pro with retina screen and running Windows on it, especially since Windows isn't optimized for retina apps and you can't choose to run unoptimized apps at a certain res, like in OS X. You can't download Chrome retina for Windows - you can for OS X. I'm beta testing the retina res version of Photoshop and it will be out shortly.

Also, the Geforce gaming card in the MBP runs Maya fine but Windows drivers aren't optimized for Maya and stuff with non-Quadro hardware so you'll encounter more problems than running it in OS X. If you want to read more about that kind of thing, read my article here:

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012...muscle-ahead/5/

Keep in mind those benchmarks compare a 2-year-old Westmere Mac Pro with current Sandy Bridge Xeon E5 machines, so they aren't apples to apples comparisons.

But OS X is frequently faster for a lot of things (except OpenGL, where Linux is king and Windows is second place). Also, OS X's power management is better than Windows, so you'd be throwing away battery life by running it in Windows.

So, if you have no interest in running OS X, don't get the MBP. Shawn from Autodesk has one and loves it for Maya and stuff and I am typing this on my portable 3D MBP 2011 17" workstation and it works great with Maya. But get the Dell or something else if you just want a Windows machine.

Speed-wise, you're in for a big boost, actually. The 2.7GHz 2012 MBP gets 6.7 points for Cinebench R11.5 render score. That's around half of either my hyperthreaded 2.66GHz 12-core Westmere Xeon Mac Pro 2010 or a 4.5GHz overclocked i7 3770K.

Last edited by cgbeige : 10-08-2012 at 04:05 AM.
 
Old 10-08-2012, 09:05 AM   #3
PBlades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cheers, thanks for the answers.
Maybe go with a Dell then.
 
Old 10-08-2012, 03:26 PM   #4
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,909
The Dell M6700 is in a whole different class of notebook, its a mobile workstation. That means 4 memory slots (up to 32 GB) instead of 2 (up to 16 GB), Quadro and FirePro graphics options with up to 4 GB of memory instead of GeForce graphics with 1 GB of memory, internal monitor color calibration, and the component selection for the Dell is broader (more processor options, hard disk options, etc.). If you're going to run Windows anyway the Dell is definitely a more powerful machine and also costs less. I don't want to sound too hard on the MBP because they have excellent build quality and superb displays but if you're not going to use OS X you're just paying more money for less performance.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 10-08-2012, 04:29 PM   #5
PBlades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeh thats a valid point, I am more inclined to go for the Dell with windows at the moment, but still considering A MBP with osx, as you both pointed out running windows on it would be pointless.
I would never have considered a mac before but thought it might be worth looking at now i'm in the market for a mobile workstation...
 
Old 10-08-2012, 06:38 PM   #6
cgbeige
Expert
 
cgbeige's Avatar
portfolio
Dave Girard
Opinions are mine. You can't have them.
San_Francisrococo, USA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,001
if you're planning on using it for a lot of video stuff, you'll probably be better of with OS X. 3D is still dominated by Windows but OS X tends to have better plug-in support for video stuff since it dominates professional video (regardless of how shitty FCPX is). The MBPs are the only machine that has OpenCL support for Premiere Pro, for example. Smoke is Mac-only now.

Recent builds of V-Ray for Maya can mix Windows and Mac distributed render nodes so you wouldn't be sacrificing much by using OS X:

http://polygonspixelsandpaint.tumbl...ost/32542042644
 
Old 10-08-2012, 09:39 PM   #7
PBlades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well it will be for 3d & working with raw video, so that thunderbolt connection might be useful for the new blackmagic raw camera coming out...


thanks or all the info cgbeige
 
Old 10-08-2012, 09:51 PM   #8
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBlades
Well it will be for 3d & working with raw video, so that thunderbolt connection might be useful for the new blackmagic raw camera coming out...


That's not a deal breaker in my opinion. You can use an eSATA dock too since the media for the BMC is 2.5" SATA SSD. Though there are some other cool peripherals for Thunderbolt in the works.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 10-08-2012, 11:03 PM   #9
cgbeige
Expert
 
cgbeige's Avatar
portfolio
Dave Girard
Opinions are mine. You can't have them.
San_Francisrococo, USA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,001
ya, Matrox is sending me one of these to review:

http://www.matrox.com/docking_station/en/ds1/

I don't have USB 3 on my 2011 MBP so this will give me it and a bunch of other options while splitting out the display. But ya, I already have eSATA RAID connected to one of these:

http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/EXP34SATA2F1/

But eSATA maxes out at 3Gb/s and Thunderbolt is 10Gb/s, which is going to give you a lot more bandwidth for RAW footage and video. It's kind of crazy how fast Thunderbolt is. You could max out two USB 3 devices on it.

Last edited by cgbeige : 10-08-2012 at 11:07 PM.
 
Old 10-09-2012, 04:04 PM   #10
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgbeige
But eSATA maxes out at 3Gb/s and Thunderbolt is 10Gb/s, which is going to give you a lot more bandwidth for RAW footage and video.


ThunderBolt is crazy fast, like an external PCI Express kind of. Though the eSATA specification follows the SATA specification so there are 6 Gb/s eSATA devices out there. Like I said, in my opinion this is not a deal breaker.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 10-09-2012, 04:13 PM   #11
cgbeige
Expert
 
cgbeige's Avatar
portfolio
Dave Girard
Opinions are mine. You can't have them.
San_Francisrococo, USA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,001
1080p RAW video is 6.6Gb/s:

http://media.ciena.com/images/Color-depth-chart-2.jpg

and that's without any secondary layers.
 
Old 10-09-2012, 04:34 PM   #12
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgbeige
1080p RAW video is 6.6Gb/s:

http://media.ciena.com/images/Color-depth-chart-2.jpg

and that's without any secondary layers.


I don't really follow why this matters. Are you saying use the BMC and record to a MBP over ThunderBolt instead of the SSD media? The BMC records the same raw video the SSD media so connecting it to a MBP to capture is kind of a moot point.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 10-09-2012, 04:52 PM   #13
cgbeige
Expert
 
cgbeige's Avatar
portfolio
Dave Girard
Opinions are mine. You can't have them.
San_Francisrococo, USA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,001
I was just pointing out that HD RAW video potentially passes the 6Gb/s limitation of eSATA 6Gb but not Thunderbolt. The RAID drives are irrelevant if the bus is the weakest link.

unless you're doing offline in which case the playback of HD RAW isn't an issue.

Last edited by cgbeige : 10-09-2012 at 04:56 PM.
 
Old 10-09-2012, 05:04 PM   #14
olson
Houdini|Python|Linux
portfolio
Luke Olson
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgbeige
I was just pointing out that HD RAW video potentially passes the 6Gb/s limitation of eSATA 6Gb but not Thunderbolt. The RAID drives are irrelevant if the bus is the weakest link.


I guess I still don't see the point. Nothing the original poster said they will be doing is going to need 10 Gb/s of throughput. Even the BMC 2.5K raw footage is around 1.2 Gb/s. The maximum throughput of ThunberBolt is nice but it doesn't really matter in this case.
__________________
http://www.whenpicsfly.com
 
Old 10-09-2012, 08:09 PM   #15
PBlades
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Am I right to think that buying a Mac would be good in terms of customer support when travelling, since apple is everywhere nowadays? or is this not really a valid point vs a dell...
 
Thread Closed share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.