Looking back and to the future of CG

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  08 August 2010
Looking back and to the future of CG

I just started watching some older SciFy show and I started wondering how the CG that looks great today will look a couple of years from now.

One show I'm talking about is Babylon 5 and I often wonder if newer shows will one day seem as distant as Babylon 5 seems now.

Maybe if I had watched Babylon 5 when it first came out, I would have been impressed.


What do you guys think.. any CG stuff you guys think have aged particularly well?

Last edited by thedaywillcome : 08 August 2010 at 08:36 PM.
 
  08 August 2010
I've read your post about 5 times and I can't, for the life of me, work out what you're trying to say.
 
  08 August 2010
Originally Posted by TMunro: I've read your post about 5 times and I can't, for the life of me, work out what you're trying to say.


I believe you are right and I was afraid of that. I edited my post a bit to try to make it resemble "English" a bit more



EDIT: another point is.. sometimes I wonder if outdated CG in a way taints what once was an amazing show.... so with SciFy shows .. going back and watching them might not be as great as going back and watching shows that do not rely heavily on CG.

Last edited by thedaywillcome : 08 August 2010 at 09:07 AM.
 
  08 August 2010
your post makes sense. now at least

yes, there is cg that has aged really well, still extremely impressive. for instance Jurassic Park
or lord of the rings,
 
  08 August 2010
Original Tron has aged remarkably well, granted there is a lot of traditional animation in there as well and it is highly stylised but, they worked well with what they had.
 
  08 August 2010
If you watch the original Toy Story you will notice how aged it looks. The video game for Toy Story 3 has pretty much the same level graphics except its in real time
 
  08 August 2010
No, it's all the same.
 
  08 August 2010
I was surprised how well the digital shots in Mighty Joe Young still looked last time I watched it.

Jumanji's monkeys always looked "digitalish" though


Sometimes you can see a movie that has fake computer graphics.
Escape From New York--there is a digital model of New York and a helicopter is flying over it-and I thought-hey that's pretty cool looking cg for 1981.
I read it was an actual model-painted black with some kind of reflective tape over it so when they filmed it only the glowing tape showed up.

I wasnt really tricked by the tin foil man stand in used in Terminator 2 ( I mean some of the shots where he is fighting in the steel mill)

Last edited by kelgy : 08 August 2010 at 03:09 PM.
 
  08 August 2010
If you want to hit the "way-way-back" button ... take a look at Kubrick's 2001 again. Done with practical models in the 60s and still holding up fine. Yeah, some stuff isn't going to hold par, but what difference does it make? They hold up well in "nostalgia" which is all that matters to most people (Star Wars episodes IV, V & VI plus the Star Trek television series - for example).
 
  08 August 2010
If you want to see the bad of aged CG, look no further than the average playstation 1 game... they haven't aged well at all. The 3d was amazing at the time though.
 
  08 August 2010
"Space: Above and Beyond" aged pretty well in my opinion. Rewatched it just last year and for me it's still the best Sci-Fi show to date.
 
  08 August 2010
Originally Posted by ConnortheCraftmaster: If you want to see the bad of aged CG, look no further than the average playstation 1 game... they haven't aged well at all. The 3d was amazing at the time though.


It's a huge span - 12 years (ps1 is a 1994 release and ps3 is 2006). But ps3 games already look pretty aged as well.
 
  08 August 2010
Originally Posted by ConnortheCraftmaster: If you want to see the bad of aged CG, look no further than the average playstation 1 game... they haven't aged well at all. The 3d was amazing at the time though.


True. I remember the Resident Evil, Tomb Raider, and Final Fantasy 7 cut scenes being the most amazing thing since sliced bread when I was 15. Now they all look pretty lousy by todays standards. Hell, they looked pretty bad by the year 2000's standards.

Myst was always considered to have the "prettiest" graphics in the ninties. Its all still frames but overall I think it still holds up relatively well as a "pretty" game.
__________________
"Have you ever just stared at it.......Marveled at its bee yooty?"
 
  08 August 2010
Originally Posted by zzacmann: True. I remember the Resident Evil, Tomb Raider, and Final Fantasy 7 cut scenes being the most amazing thing since sliced bread when I was 15. Now they all look pretty lousy by todays standards. Hell, they looked pretty bad by the year 2000's standards.

Myst was always considered to have the "prettiest" graphics in the ninties. Its all still frames but overall I think it still holds up relatively well as a "pretty" game.


Graphics aside, but games themselves were, and looked better than now. At least sequels look horribly worse.
 
  08 August 2010
i personally think graphic quality has reach its top limit of reality. any top notch hollywood movie nowadays will have a top notch vfx quality that its hard to define which is real or not.
the future would be how to do that with minimum cost (processing unit cost lower and lower) and real time (gaming more realistic).
__________________
svnstrk.blogspot
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.