First Trailer for Iron Man 3

Become a member of the CGSociety

Connect, Share, and Learn with our Large Growing CG Art Community. It's Free!

THREAD CLOSED
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10 October 2012   #31
On the casting thing, there was this news article--could well explain why they changed his ethnicity.

So Shane Black is directing it--he may have been the first of Dutch's crew to be killed by the Predator but at least he made Billy laugh.
 
Old 10 October 2012   #32
Originally Posted by Artbot: Looks interesting. But does anyone else find it strange that Stark's home doesn't have AA defenses? I mean, he's a huge weapons contractor (or was), and with the number of people he's pissed off, it's hard to believe he'd leave his fortress unprotected. But there I go again, trying to make sense out of a superhero movie.


Stark guard his fortress just like Loki guard his scepter and that "invincible" thingmajik in the Avengers. And don't try to make sense out of a superhero movie, no, you can only do that to Prometheus Joss Whedon fan will get angry if you does. (yeah, I know Iron Man 3 have different director, but you get my point )
 
Old 10 October 2012   #33
Originally Posted by ThE_JacO: I seem to be the only person here bothered by the fact that 250Kg worth of metal armor don't push the sofa in more than RDJ's 72Kg without the suit would


You sound just like one of the TD's on my team!

Off-Topic Question: In a big studio production, are SFX/VFX people allowed to escalate things like that back to Writer/Director? "The suit weighs 250 kg and it won't work with the guy sitting down". That kind of stuff.

Originally Posted by kelgy: On the casting thing, there was this news article--could well explain why they changed his ethnicity.


Well every CHINESE person I knew was actually excited by the idea that Andy Lau would play a bad guy. Everybody knows it's just a superhero film... Sheesh.

Also everybody knows the bad guy roles are more fun. I thought we already crossed that barrier when Jet Li played the bad guy in Lethal Weapon 4.

But yeah, that's probably the reason....
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 10 October 2012   #34
Originally Posted by CGIPadawan: Off-Topic Question: In a big studio production, are SFX/VFX people allowed to escalate things like that back to Writer/Director? "The suit weighs 250 kg and it won't work with the guy sitting down". That kind of stuff.

More or less.
Stuff like that gets pointed out in dailies all the time, and then a mock-up or a correction, or maybe just a note, will be pushed upstream for the vfx supe to decide on (which might or might not need the director to clear it).

Most of the time it's minor fixes and they are done for free or simply cleared internally if it's stuff like that, but some times they might have a cost, and a producer might ask that the question isn't raised officially and it's let go under the radar, or might bundle it into some rebid if there's one going.

Different shops have different amounts and tiers of reviews and interfaces to reach up top, but 99.9% of the time this will amount to the facility vfx supe talking to the studio side show vfx supe, or in the rare occasions the two figures are aligned, to the director, or just making the call outright.
__________________
Come, Join the Cult http://www.cultofrig.com - Rigging from First Principles
 
Old 10 October 2012   #35
Originally Posted by ThE_JacO: More or less.
Stuff like that gets pointed out in dailies all the time, and then a mock-up or a correction, or maybe just a note, will be pushed upstream for the vfx supe to decide on (which might or might not need the director to clear it).

Most of the time it's minor fixes and they are done for free or simply cleared internally if it's stuff like that, but some times they might have a cost, and a producer might ask that the question isn't raised officially and it's let go under the radar, or might bundle it into some rebid if there's one going.

Different shops have different amounts and tiers of reviews and interfaces to reach up top, but 99.9% of the time this will amount to the facility vfx supe talking to the studio side show vfx supe, or in the rare occasions the two figures are aligned, to the director, or just making the call outright.


I imagine though if they tried to "fix" that Iron Man Suit Sit Down thing... I mean the first thing to suffer would be the blocking or even the mood. Because I think the director might have been going for a certain type of feeling for the scene to have Iron Man sitting on a couch with the helmet open....

So it can quickly end up as an issue on the Writing side.

Either that or. like you said.. "Just don't raise the question to highest levels."

But in animation I find such types of issues are easier to escalate and fix since all the assets are virtual anyway and you just need to invest more render time (which in my view should always be estimated to excess anyway).

Thanks for the tidbit about this though. Guess a robust proof-reading process at script level or a very hard review at storyboard level is very important. To wit, a VFX supe could have called "logic error" on seeing Iron Man sitting down on a couch in storyboards. :P
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 10 October 2012   #36
Tony makes his own Stark Industries superhero-grade home furnishings.
 
Old 10 October 2012   #37
Originally Posted by hypercube: Tony makes his own Stark Industries superhero-grade home furnishings.


That or my own favorite response: "It's JUST a movie!"
__________________
"Your most creative work is pre-production, once the film is in production, demands on time force you to produce rather than create."
My ArtStation
 
Old 10 October 2012   #38
Originally Posted by CGIPadawan: That or my own favorite response: "It's JUST a movie!"


Useful also for when wondering why he doesn't crush his sofa or how he can withstand direct hits from Mjolnir or 5000 ton space monsters without liquifying inside his suit.

(Something they do talk about a bit in the Extremis comic book, which they are still supposedly including elements from in this)
 
Old 10 October 2012   #39
Originally Posted by hypercube: Tony makes his own Stark Industries superhero-grade home furnishings.


If he can single-handedly build a magical flying suit that defies physics, I'll let the Active Nano-Mesh Aero-Spring couch technology slide.

You see, in movie-land, Inventor Genius Superheros think ahead when it comes to creature comforts, but not AA defenses.
__________________
www.artbot.com

 
Old 10 October 2012   #40
Originally Posted by Artbot: If he can single-handedly build a magical flying suit that defies physics, I'll let the Active Nano-Mesh Aero-Spring couch technology slide.

You see, in movie-land, Inventor Genius Superheros think ahead when it comes to creature comforts, but not AA defenses.


Maybe Mandarin disabled them in some nefarious scheme!
__________________
Personal: www.japetusproductions.com
Work:Straightface Studios

 
Old 10 October 2012   #41
It's all part of the curse of pursuing an interest in the field, when I was young and didn't know anything about film or visual effects everything was awesome. Now at movies I think to myself "that wouldn't work like that...". Same thing happened after I learned guitar, bands I used to think were awesome I became irritated at how simple and repetitive their riffs were. Regardless I am still most likely going to see the movie in theaters to at minimum cherish the hard work artists have put into it.
 
Old 10 October 2012   #42
Originally Posted by japetus: Maybe Mandarin disabled them in some nefarious scheme!


The Nano-Couch or the AA defenses?
__________________
www.artbot.com

 
Old 10 October 2012   #43
Originally Posted by ThE_JacO: I seem to be the only person here bothered by the fact that 250Kg worth of metal armor don't push the sofa in more than RDJ's 72Kg without the suit would
No, it bugged me as well. In the first film his armor was so heavy that he smashed the floor open just by standing up. :/
 
Old 10 October 2012   #44
Originally Posted by Artbot: The Nano-Couch or the AA defenses?


Both I bet...he somehow modifies the binding properties of the Nano-Couch, making it collapse when Stark comes home and goes to recline from a long day of crime fighting. The failure of his $5 million Nano-Couch preoccupies Stark long enough for Mandarin to take out his AA defenses demo charges and then the helicopters, disguised as news copters, come in to blow away his house away! See? Perfect!
__________________
Personal: www.japetusproductions.com
Work:Straightface Studios

 
Old 10 October 2012   #45
To get back on track, this is one heck of a trailer. It ticks a lot of boxes of what a good trailer should be, I am excited to learn what will happen to Tony this time around.
 
Thread Closed share thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.