CGTalk > Main > General Discussion
Login register
reply share thread « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-24-2012, 03:12 PM   #31
noouch
Smooth Like Hollywood
 
noouch's Avatar
portfolio
Niko Conte
Munich, Germany
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,151
Send a message via ICQ to noouch
...so how long until DD starts losing talent over its corporate antics?
__________________
This should take less than a few minutes.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:13 PM   #32
darthviper107
Expert
 
darthviper107's Avatar
portfolio
Zachary Brackin
3D Artist
Precocity LLC
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,955
They did pretty good on The Avengers, but there's been some pretty terrible conversions--I think if they plan ahead of time to do it in conversion they can do a pretty good job, but there's a lot of movies that they decide to do it after the movie is pretty much done and those have always looked terrible. I have low expectations for the new GI Joe movie conversion.

Or take for instance the conversion of Star Wars Episode I, that was the worst I've ever seen


I don't think they can patent 3D conversion, but they could certainly patent a method of doing it like with how TV's do their own conversion, an automatic method rather than actually going in and separating out elements by hand or remodeling the scene and doing projections.
__________________
The Z-Axis
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:14 PM   #33
BigPixolin
Banned
 
BigPixolin's Avatar
c none
US
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyattHarris
Hopefully this will speed up the demise of 3D.


Or just the demise of conversions in favor of shot in 3d.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:34 PM   #34
Calabi
Frequenter
 
Calabi's Avatar
portfolio
Wobbleyou
London, United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 148
Doesnt our brains infringe on this? It converts 2D images to 3D.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:50 PM   #35
th3ta
Veteran
 
th3ta's Avatar
portfolio
3d Artist
In a dark office, USA
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 739
What I don't get is how you can patent a process that uses standard tools in off the shelf software. I mean, object tracking and shifting images with roto?

Why don't they just patent the use of 3d type and the color blue while they're at it.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:58 PM   #36
DimeS
Frequenter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
The studio that used to be Rainmaker in Vancouver (then became CIS, now Method) was publicly listed on the Toronto exchange. Their numbers included the FX part of the business as well as their film processing side. I believe the FX side was significantly less profitable when I checked it out. What used to be Mainframe animation became Rainmaker...confusing I know, and is still listed as RNK on the TSX. A share goes for a whopping $0.16 currently.
As an investor I don't think I'd touch an FX house with a 10 foot pole. Way too unpredictable revenue and thin margins at the best of times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by japetus
Out of curiosity are there any other 3D effects houses that are now publicly traded or is DD the first? It seems like the way almost all places are run (ie: not much profit) that stockholders would always be angry and it seems like it could potentially be detrimental to finding and keeping clients and to effects work in general to have your effects house be a publicly traded company.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:59 PM   #37
BrainFreeze
Know-it-All
portfolio
Mark Wellington
Everett, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calabi
Doesnt our brains infringe on this? It converts 2D images to 3D.

Shhh, don't give them any ideas. What, you like being sued?

On a more serious note this is a problem with "software method" patents. Software itself cannot be patented because it can be boiled down to math and math can't be patented. But throw in "systems and method" into your application's name and attach a diagram of computer hardware and you're good to go.

While many argue the obviousness of the patent I would also/instead argue it's utility.

If you actually care call or write your congress(wo)man.

P.S. If this does cause horrible 2d->3d conversions to go away then maybe it has utility after all
 
Old 07-24-2012, 05:00 PM   #38
Magnus3D
Expert
 
Magnus3D's Avatar
portfolio
Magnus Rönnkvist
Freelance 3D artist and photographer
Göteborg, Sweden
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,332
Send a message via ICQ to Magnus3D Send a message via MSN to Magnus3D Send a message via Yahoo to Magnus3D
They are shooting themselves in the foot just like Apple by focusing more on lawsuits than what they should do.

Calabi: True, the human brain pulls separate 2D images from each eye and combines them into a 3D image making us see depth in the real world. I will sit back and wait for DD's lawsuit because i have two eyes and a brain.

/ Magnus
 
Old 07-24-2012, 07:19 PM   #39
redbellpeppers
Lord of the posts
portfolio
Chris
Standing, USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyattHarris
Hopefully this will speed up the demise of 3D.


Why? 3D is awesome.
 
Old 07-24-2012, 08:06 PM   #40
pingking
Expert
portfolio
michael vorberg
digital compositor
freelance
stuttgart, Germany
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBowman
Was The Amazing Spiderman a 2D to 3D conversion? Because it was the first live action film I've enjoyed in 3D....it probably helped that most of the stunt scenes where we seen Spiderman in full costume were CG but still, the live action footage felt very dimensional.


they shot with a stereo rig, can be seen here
but theres always scenes/shots that get converted. because of technical issues (cameras dont match or dont work) or creative decissions
 
Old 07-24-2012, 08:28 PM   #41
eliseu gouveia
Engine of Creation
 
eliseu gouveia's Avatar
Eliseu Gouveia
Comicbook Artist
Portugal
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,339
I wish I had the patent on breathing.
__________________
My Deviations
 
Old 07-25-2012, 02:23 PM   #42
THX1311
Banned
 
THX1311's Avatar
portfolio
William Noble
Design Concepts inc.
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,062
Quote:
"Hopefully this will speed up the demise of 3D."

+1

My sentiments exactly!

Cheers
 
Old 07-25-2012, 03:20 PM   #43
ambient-whisper
Gone travelling :D
 
ambient-whisper's Avatar
CGSociety Member
portfolio
Martin Krol
Pixomondo
Canada
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,631

Quote:
Originally Posted by THX1311
+1

My sentiments exactly!

Cheers

not mine. I like 3d. Including everyone I go to the movies with. You still have the choice to see movies in 2d.
 
Old 07-25-2012, 04:07 PM   #44
darthviper107
Expert
 
darthviper107's Avatar
portfolio
Zachary Brackin
3D Artist
Precocity LLC
Dallas, USA
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,955
I like 3D but I'd prefer that they do it only for films that deserve it--the visual stunning films and animations.
__________________
The Z-Axis
 
Old 07-25-2012, 05:05 PM   #45
bobtronic
aka bobtronic
 
bobtronic's Avatar
portfolio
Matthias Bober
3D monkey
Frankfurt, Germany
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient-whisper
not mine. I like 3d. Including everyone I go to the movies with. You still have the choice to see movies in 2d.


Unfortunatly not, more and more cinemas show only the 3D version to save money.

On top of that I wear glasses and have no depth perception. Going to the cinema is not very attractive for me anymore, which is a shame because I used to love to watch a good movie on the big screen.
__________________
http://www.bobtronic.com
 
reply share thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
CGSociety
Society of Digital Artists
www.cgsociety.org

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2006,
Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Minimize Ads
Forum Jump
Miscellaneous

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.